Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:16 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
3D CSS Effects in Snow Leopard Safari, And More on Future of Video and Flash?



In the past, we've speculated that Apple's resistance to supporting Adobe's Flash on the iPhone and their efforts to add new features to HTML/CSS is, in part, to reduce their long term dependence on Flash.

Ajaxian points to an impressive demo by Charles Ying which shows off hardware accelerated 3D CSS Visual Effects that are now supported in Snow Leopard's Safari builds as well as the latest Webkit nightly builds. If you have either of these versions installed, you can view a live version yourself here. Otherwise, you can watch this video of the demo:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R6sb4NO25E

These new 3D effects have been proposed for standards inclusion. If successful, future browsers will also adopt these effects.

While these will help provide standards-based tools for accomplishing visual effects that have been the realm of Flash in the past, there has recently been a setback on efforts to standardize on a specific video playback format for HTML5. Video remains the most popular use for Flash on the web. Due to ongoing disagreements between Apple, Google and other web browser developers, the acceptance of a single video codec standard for HTML5 has been indefinitely delayed.
Quote:
"After an inordinate amount of discussions, both in public and privately, on the situation regarding codecs for video and audio in HTML5, I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that there is no suitable codec that all vendors are willing to implement and ship," Hickson wrote. "I have therefore removed the two subsections in the HTML5 spec in which codecs would have been required, and have instead left the matter undefined."
Apple, of course, has been pushing H.264 and opposes the Ogg Theora alternative due to the potential patent claims in the future. Mozilla and Opera have their own issues with cost and licensing issues with H.264 and prefer Ogg Theora. The inability to come to an agreement means that there will be no accepted standard format for HTML5. As a result, Flash will likely remain the dominant format for online video for the time being.

Article Link: 3D CSS Effects in Snow Leopard Safari, And More on Future of Video and Flash?
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:23 PM   #2
oli2140
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
I'm not going to lie, that looks pretty impressive.
oli2140 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:23 PM   #3
Morky
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
MPEG group

The MPEG group needs to give their stuff away or have it rendered obsolete by Flash and Silverlight.
Morky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:23 PM   #4
Maximillian
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
In case anyone is wondering, the music is by Ratatat ('Track 01' off of '9 Beats'). And it f***ing rocks.
__________________
'08 2.4GHz Macbook Pro | Decorate the New Guy
Maximillian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:24 PM   #5
Peace
macrumors Demi-God
 
Peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
Using the link under Snow Leopard and Safari makes it VERY impressive.
Peace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:26 PM   #6
Boneoh
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So. Cal.
This is great. But the freakin' committee can't agree on a standard codec? WTF!

Best example of design by committee is a camel, they were trying for a horse!
Boneoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:27 PM   #7
macUser2007
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
Flash Is A Must For The Iphone!

There are so many sites I can't view on my new 3G S, it's pathetic.

Apple really must implement Flash on the iPhone ASAP, or it will be the butt of jokes again, like with copy/paste.

Flash is A MUST, with over 95% adoption rate across platforms. It is the only HUGE weak spot left on the iPhone.

If I were the competition, I'd make ads showing Android (or WM) accessing fun FLASH sites and video, while the iPhone shows blank pages.

Last edited by macUser2007 : Jul 13, 2009 at 03:34 PM.
macUser2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:28 PM   #8
BornAgainMac
macrumors 68030
 
BornAgainMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
I hope Apple wins this one with their bully powers.
BornAgainMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:28 PM   #9
Pooshka
macrumors 6502a
 
Pooshka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Does anyone happen to know the URL of that website?
Pooshka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:29 PM   #10
g4jedi
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Send a message via AIM to g4jedi
Sure...

"If successful, future browsers will also adopt these effects."
Don't hold your breath! IE will always be way behind on this sort of thing. Look at the simple text-shadow effect in CSS. Up until recently, it was only compatible with Safari and to this day is not supported by any IE.
g4jedi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:29 PM   #11
pdjudd
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Plymouth, MN
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boneoh View Post
This is great. But the freakin' committee can't agree on a standard codec? WTF!
I call that par for the course. Large companies almost never come to a complete agreement - expecially when their objectives are different.
pdjudd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:29 PM   #12
cosmokanga2
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Canada, where we live in igloos.
Downloaded the nightly build to test it and it is awesome. Get this supported in more browsers and websites could really be cool.
__________________
Unibody 15" Macbook Pro, 3rd Gen 8GB iPod nano, Nike+iPod, Nikon D80, f/3.5 18-70mm Kit Lens
My Flickr
My Photography Site
cosmokanga2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:30 PM   #13
xUKHCx
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
xUKHCx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The Kop
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pooshka View Post
Does anyone happen to know the URL of that website?
.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
If you have either of these versions installed, you can view a live version yourself here.
__________________
The red men: Paul William Carlile (19), Raymond Thomas Chapman (50), Gary Christopher Church (19), Joseph Clark (29), Paul Clark (18)
xUKHCx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:34 PM   #14
John.B
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flyover Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Apple, of course, has been pushing H.264 and opposes the Ogg Theora alternative due to the potential patent claims in the future.
The lack of hardware acceleration for Ogg Theora is the main issue. Apple has been pushing H.264 because its a standard that (unlike Flash) runs fast on Apple hardware and hardware by other manufacturers.

Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
Flash is A MUST, with over 95% adoption rate across platforms. It is the only HUGE weak spot left on the iPhone.
No offense buddy, but get a clue.

Flash sucks on Linux and OS X. If Adobe wants Flash to really be the ubiquitous standard (and have the web world bow down to them in homage) they need to seriously improve performance on the non-Windows platforms. I can only imagine how bad it would drain the battery of the iPhone.

Personally, I'm glad that Flash isn't on my iPhone, it saves me from having to figure out how to run a Flash block plug-in on Mobile Safari like I have to for Safari and Firefox.
__________________
MA497LL/A FB063LL/B FB683LL/A MC137LL/A FB463LL/A
XK1 0141102 0107430

Last edited by John.B : Jul 13, 2009 at 03:40 PM.
John.B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:37 PM   #15
Detektiv-Pinky
macrumors 6502a
 
Detektiv-Pinky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
It looks nice in this demo, but I fail to see the general usefulness in a web-browser?
__________________
Anecdotal evidence is an oxymoron!
Detektiv-Pinky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:39 PM   #16
str1f3
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morky View Post
The MPEG group needs to give their stuff away or have it rendered obsolete by Flash and Silverlight.
It's not that simple. The MPEG group uses that money to pay for research and personnel. This isn't a company like Microsoft. It consists of industries, universities, and research institutions.

I would like to see them maintain or lower the current license rate. That being said, H.264 will move forward not matter what Mozilla or Opera says. There is too much hardware that supports it and Ogg Theora is not as good.

Silverlight will go nowhere and flash is losing its stranglehold as less websites are using it everyday.

I'm truly impressed with this. This is the future of the web.

Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
There are so many sites I can't view on my new 3G S, it's pathetic.

Apple really must implement Flash on the iPhone ASAP, or it will be the butt of jokes again, like with copy/paste.

Flash is A MUST, with over 95% adoption rate across platforms. It is the only HUGE weak spot left on the iPhone.

If I were the competition, I'd make ads showing Android (or WM) accessing fun FLASH sites and video, while the iPhone shows blank pages.
The iPhone will never support Flash. They want to kill it off. It is the reason you see them pushing standards like http live streaming and CSS3


Quote:
Originally Posted by Detektiv-Pinky View Post
It looks nice in this demo, but I fail to see the general usefulness in a web-browser?
Why not go back to the command line? It's just as useful and quicker.
str1f3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:41 PM   #17
PJR
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Snow Stacks = ColorIris?

So this might be a really dumb comment, but are we looking at this from an application viewpoint, or a capability one?

Because as far as I can tell, this is an application called CoolIris that is already available and works quite well on Macs.

http://www.cooliris.com/

If it is a "new" application then Apple really ripped somebody off...
PJR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:42 PM   #18
ziggyonice
macrumors 68000
 
ziggyonice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Rural America
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
The inability to come to an agreement means that there will be no accepted standard format for HTML5. As a result, Flash will likely remain the dominant format for online video for the time being.
Noooo! Down with Flash!!!
__________________
I was once a Jedi Knight, the same as your father.
MacBook Pro [First Generation] | 2.16GHz | 2GB RAM | 120GB HD | Mac OS X (10.6.1)
iPhone 3G | 16GB | White
ziggyonice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:44 PM   #19
Lixivial
macrumors 6502a
 
Lixivial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Between cats, dogs and wanderlust.
Argh, rehashing the "debate" over HTML5 video codecs really needn't be done.

Hickson put it to rest weeks ago. The argument being there's no "defined" standard for img tags, audio, or anything else. And it's simple enough to support both, so that's what will happen.
Lixivial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:45 PM   #20
str1f3
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJR View Post
So this might be a really dumb comment, but are we looking at this from an application viewpoint, or a capability one?

Because as far as I can tell, this is an application called CoolIris that is already available and works quite well on Macs.

http://www.cooliris.com/

If it is a "new" application then Apple really ripped somebody off...
This isn't by Apple. This is what you can do with open standards.
str1f3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:45 PM   #21
DavidLeblond
macrumors 68000
 
DavidLeblond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by PJR View Post
So this might be a really dumb comment, but are we looking at this from an application viewpoint, or a capability one?

Because as far as I can tell, this is an application called CoolIris that is already available and works quite well on Macs.

http://www.cooliris.com/

If it is a "new" application then Apple really ripped somebody off...
The article isn't about how neat the video is, but that the video was done using CSS.
__________________
www.davidleblond.com
Try my new iPhone game, Claustrophobia!
DavidLeblond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:47 PM   #22
markm49uk
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kingston Upon Hull, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
There are so many sites I can't view on my new 3G S, it's pathetic.

Apple really must implement Flash on the iPhone ASAP, or it will be the butt of jokes again, like with copy/paste.

Flash is A MUST, with over 95% adoption rate across platforms. It is the only HUGE weak spot left on the iPhone.

If I were the competition, I'd make ads showing Android (or WM) accessing fun FLASH sites and video, while the iPhone shows blank pages.
It will never happen - flash needs to die. Apple are making a concerted effort to make this so - what websites in particular are you missing ? I avoid flash sites but that might be just me.
__________________
iMac 24", MacBook Pro Unibody, Macbook Pro, Macbook, Power Mac G5, iPod Touch, iPod Shuffle, iPod 8Gb 3g, Apple TV, iPhone 3G,
markm49uk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:48 PM   #23
MacFly123
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
There are so many sites I can't view on my new 3G S, it's pathetic.

Apple really must implement Flash on the iPhone ASAP, or it will be the butt of jokes again, like with copy/paste.

Flash is A MUST, with over 95% adoption rate across platforms. It is the only HUGE weak spot left on the iPhone.

If I were the competition, I'd make ads showing Android (or WM) accessing fun FLASH sites and video, while the iPhone shows blank pages.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g4jedi View Post
"If successful, future browsers will also adopt these effects."
Don't hold your breath! IE will always be way behind on this sort of thing. Look at the simple text-shadow effect in CSS. Up until recently, it was only compatible with Safari and to this day is not supported by any IE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdjudd View Post
I call that par for the course. Large companies almost never come to a complete agreement - expecially when their objectives are different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John.B View Post
The lack of hardware acceleration for Ogg Theora is the main issue. Apple has been pushing H.264 because its a standard that (unlike Flash) runs fast on Apple hardware and hardware by other manufacturers.


No offense buddy, but get a clue.

Flash sucks on Linux and OS X. If Adobe wants Flash to really be the ubiquitous standard (and have the web world bow down to them in homage) they need to seriously improve performance on the non-Windows platforms. I can only imagine how bad it would drain the battery of the iPhone.

Personally, I'm glad that Flash isn't on my iPhone, it saves me from having to figure out how to run a Flash block plug-in on Mobile Safari like I have to for Safari and Firefox.
It is all a complex history and political corporate war that is going on. It isn't as simple as iPhone needs FLASH lol. FLASH sucks in all seriousness. Pretty much the only reason it is still around is because it got in with video online. All of these battles you see going on like Apple refusing to put it on the iPhone is all strategic to set things right and get it out of everything once and for all. I hope they succeed because I hate flash, but it is looking like a difficult, long drawn out battle.

P.S. I think IE will always suck as well. That is a whole other battle. But pushing for these standards helps force Microsoft to stop crippling the web as they have done for the last 10 years! It is just their nature to try to lock in people to every aspect of their products/technologies at whatever the cost or expense to advancement instead of simply innovating and making products that people would actually CHOOSE versus being forced!

P.P.S. These new effects are pretty much exactly like CoolIris: http://www.cooliris.com/
__________________
- Steve Jobs' best friend!

Last edited by MacFly123 : Jul 13, 2009 at 03:52 PM. Reason: add
MacFly123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:48 PM   #24
tekcor
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by macUser2007 View Post
Apple really must implement Flash on the iPhone ASAP, or it will be the butt of jokes again, like with copy/paste.

Flash is A MUST, with over 95% adoption rate across platforms. It is the only HUGE weak spot left on the iPhone.
Flash is an abomination. It started as an animation suite, which was pushed into gaming by it's users. So Macromedia made it more powerful for games. Adobe has purchased it and is using Flash as it's own development environment, but it's just not that good.

It's not optimized at all either. I was realizing that while browsing the web on my battery that all these damn Flash-based ads are killing my battery. Why does this stupid 468x60 ad need so much of my processing power!? It's because the Flash developers are completely inept at making Flash hardware-friendly.

I guarantee the day Adobe makes a good version of Flash, Apple will support it. Until then, no flash on the iPhone. I'd have it completely uninstalled on my laptop, if it wasn't necessary for so much of the media on the web.
tekcor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 2009, 03:49 PM   #25
str1f3
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lixivial View Post
Argh, rehashing the "debate" over HTML5 video codecs really needn't be done.

Hickson put it to rest weeks ago. The argument being there's no "defined" standard for img tags, audio, or anything else. And it's simple enough to support both, so that's what will happen.
That will last only so long. There is no hardware that supports Theora. Meanwhile Nvidia (9400m) and ATI are coming out with H.264 accelerated hardware. That's including almost every smartphone under the sun which has H.264 acceleration. This is like Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD. Everyone knows who's going to win but the question is how long will it take?
str1f3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:27 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC