|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
PowerMac G5 Update?
ThinkSecret provides some more details on PowerMac G5 Updates.
According to the rumor site, the new machines should arrive in dual 2.5GHz, 2GHz and 1.8GHz models as well as an entry level single processor 1.8GHz model. ATI 9600 XT and NVidia GeForce FX 5200 Ultra graphics cards are to be offered. ThinkSecret had warned that the bumps could be pushed back later this week. Indeed, one MacRumors source has indicated that the update may have been pushed back one day at the last minute. Last edited by arn : Jun 8, 2004 at 10:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 68020
|
No 3.0 ghz Steve?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
awe dammit..
this sucks..
__________________
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0, 3gb Ram,74gb Raptor,1.5TB Seagate,Canon 40D DSLR,Dell 24" LCD, Epson 1660 scan, Wacom, |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston, MA
|
that's a pretty good high-end boost. But, oh!, are people going to be mad about only getting to 2.5.
Additional question - would the existence of a single 1.8 preclude the G5 imac? I mean, I think they'd put single G5's in imacs and dualies in Powers... thoughts? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors regular
|
Hmm
I hope the Dual 1.8 is the same price as the current single 1.6...
__________________
Macbook c2d 2.16ghz, 2gb ram, 120gb; PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0ghz, iBook G3, Apple TV, 2nd gen 10gb iPod |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Sep 2002
|
Ok, here comes the obligatory but all the rumor sites originally said 2.6GHz. That's right. Start whining that you now need that 100MHz.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
|
i want one!
__________________
ejc on Twitter |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
|
Wait a minute - why would those be considered updates?? WE ALREADY HAVE DUAL 2.0 AND 1.8GHZ POWERMACS.
2.2 2.4 2.6 That's what makes sense. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
|
Weird!!
That seems like a REALLY weird update. As far as it looks, the processors stay exactly as we have already seen them, except for adding a way faster high end 2.5GHz. You would really think that after 12 months, the whole line would get a shuffle around. I thought 2GHz would be the low end, even a single, but to keep the 1.8 as the low end after 12 months is crazy. Although I don't doubt the sources, I would be suprised with this update.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
this kinda sucks
__________________
My website Nikon D200, D70, 70-200mm VR, 18-200 VR, 50mm f/1.8, 18-70mm, 12-24mm. Maxed out 15" MBP |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 65816
|
Eh, it looks okay...
All except for the frikkin graphics cards. I don't want no slow Nvidia 5200 :X
__________________
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
you, you're a history in rust |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
|
More PowerMac Choices
Okay - think about this: What if Apple INCREASED the choices of Powermacs?
2.6 Dual (or 2.5) 2.4 Single 2.2 Single 2.0 Dual 1.8 Dual 1.8 Single I know it's not a concept they've done before, but maybe it would help clear out more of the old processors too. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: May 2004
Location: La Villa Strangiato
|
Translation:
No one has any idea what is about (or not about) to be released.
__________________
Mac Pro Octophallus 2.8 | 13" UMBP 2.26 |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors god
|
sorry guys...
I guess we'll see... ![]() arn |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Quote:
__________________
i love brits |
|
|
|
| keysersoze |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by keysersoze |
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: in a one horse, two house, three pub town.
|
It's still a 25% mhz hike from last year,so it's not that bad. Just below exceptionally high and foolishly fed expectations.
__________________
Before a brilliant person begins something great, they must look foolish in the crowd. From the I Ching |
|
|
| Savage Henry |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Savage Henry |
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
I guess it's fine if all these models ship standard with the graphic cards listed, but obviously a BTO would be available.
![]() If these were indeed the way the updates turn out i don't think it would spell well for something like an iMac G5 with say, single 1.8 & 2.0GHz options.
__________________
MacBook Pro + iPhone 3G
|
|
|
| LaMerVipere |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by LaMerVipere |
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors member
|
Wow, if this is true, its gonna be one horrible update.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
|
If I were Apple, I would eliminate the 1.? GHZ from the
Powermac line. It just looks better. Release a 2.0 Ghz 2.6 Ghz bare 2.6 Ghz fully loaded. save the 1.6 and 1.8 for the G5 Imac. Oh yeah and release a pro Mouse, or my "mouse" money will continue to go to Microsoft (intellimouse optical). Last edited by agentmouthwash : Jun 8, 2004 at 09:52 AM. |
|
|
| agentmouthwash |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by agentmouthwash |
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors Demi-God
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: It's classified.
|
Those are the most ridiculous numbers I've ever seen for a yearly update. Rumour or not, they're ridiculous numbers for anybody to be throwing around.
So let me get this straight, after an entire year, Apple is still including an Nvidia 5200 in their systems? Why? Its a cheap video card that you can pick up for cheap in any computer store. The mouse probably costs more than the video card.
__________________
"Oh, I've always wanted to touch Stanley," signs teacher Fran Zakoor, embracing the kids… ESPN Article, 04/09/2008 |
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Miami
|
I do not have the money any way and for what I need a dual G4 would do. There are a bunch of After Effects plugins not yet for OSX.
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Belgium
|
Quote:
Well, that's an excellent point, and besides that, thinksecret also states the 'older' models (all 3 of them) will be sold with discounted prices.. but the processor speed is the same, graphics card also (I think), so what is going to be the difference between the 2 duals 1.8 & 2.0?????? I don't think apple will announce these models, it doesn't seem right, maybe after 5 months, but not 12 months! only time will tell I guess |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors 601
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
|
Oh wait, they don't. Still... don't forget to blame Apple for IBM's low G5 yields and GHz.
And don't forget to suggest that IBM's challenges are permanent, will never go away, that IBM will never compete with Intel, and Apple needs to go x86 ![]() Fun having lots of more-likely rumors this week, even if they only come a day ahead
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
i would think apple would let the airtunes airport express splash screen
last a little longer than one day... i still wouldnt be suprised to just see the new powermacs at WWDC... if the "update" did contain most of what we already have it would be pretty disappointing from a company that prides itself on innovating and suprising its loyal followers... im not going to complain about the 3ghz promise... but i wont settle either... its not that i even need that power... its just that ive mentally decided that 3ghz is the magic number... anything else wouldnt be exactly what i want so the wait continues... maybe... since it doesnt seem like anyone really knows anything...
__________________
933 quicksilver gig ram gig tibook gig ram 01.29.04 begin 01.29.07 engage 05.17.08 forever |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garden State
|
I think if these revised estimates prove to be true, we are all going to band together in an angry mob and storm Cupertino with torches and pitchforks.
Most of us want that Rev. B and have held our breaths for a whole year. 365 days of waiting and that's what we get? Say it isn't so!
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|