Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:35 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
PowerMac G5 Update?

ThinkSecret provides some more details on PowerMac G5 Updates.

According to the rumor site, the new machines should arrive in dual 2.5GHz, 2GHz and 1.8GHz models as well as an entry level single processor 1.8GHz model. ATI 9600 XT and NVidia GeForce FX 5200 Ultra graphics cards are to be offered.

ThinkSecret had warned that the bumps could be pushed back later this week. Indeed, one MacRumors source has indicated that the update may have been pushed back one day at the last minute.

Last edited by arn : Jun 8, 2004 at 10:04 AM.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:37 AM   #2
idkew
macrumors 68020
 
idkew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: where the concrete to dirt ratio is better
Send a message via AIM to idkew
No 3.0 ghz Steve?
idkew is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:37 AM   #3
adamfilip
macrumors 6502a
 
adamfilip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: burlington, Ontario canada
Send a message via ICQ to adamfilip
awe dammit..

this sucks..
__________________
PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0, 3gb Ram,74gb Raptor,1.5TB Seagate,Canon 40D DSLR,Dell 24" LCD, Epson 1660 scan, Wacom,
adamfilip is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:37 AM   #4
jesuscandle
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston, MA
that's a pretty good high-end boost. But, oh!, are people going to be mad about only getting to 2.5.

Additional question - would the existence of a single 1.8 preclude the G5 imac? I mean, I think they'd put single G5's in imacs and dualies in Powers...

thoughts?
jesuscandle is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:39 AM   #5
markoibook
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Reading, UK.
Send a message via AIM to markoibook
Hmm

I hope the Dual 1.8 is the same price as the current single 1.6...
__________________
Macbook c2d 2.16ghz, 2gb ram, 120gb; PowerMac G5 Dual 2.0ghz, iBook G3, Apple TV, 2nd gen 10gb iPod
markoibook is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:40 AM   #6
deputy_doofy
macrumors 6502a
 
deputy_doofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Ok, here comes the obligatory but all the rumor sites originally said 2.6GHz. That's right. Start whining that you now need that 100MHz.
deputy_doofy is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:40 AM   #7
dizastor
macrumors 6502a
 
dizastor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
i want one!
__________________
ejc on Twitter
dizastor is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:40 AM   #8
Grimace
Contributor
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
Wait a minute - why would those be considered updates?? WE ALREADY HAVE DUAL 2.0 AND 1.8GHZ POWERMACS.

2.2
2.4
2.6

That's what makes sense.
Grimace is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:40 AM   #9
J-Squire
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Weird!!

That seems like a REALLY weird update. As far as it looks, the processors stay exactly as we have already seen them, except for adding a way faster high end 2.5GHz. You would really think that after 12 months, the whole line would get a shuffle around. I thought 2GHz would be the low end, even a single, but to keep the 1.8 as the low end after 12 months is crazy. Although I don't doubt the sources, I would be suprised with this update.
J-Squire is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:40 AM   #10
javabear90
macrumors 6502a
 
javabear90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Send a message via AIM to javabear90
this kinda sucks
__________________
My website
Nikon D200, D70, 70-200mm VR, 18-200 VR, 50mm f/1.8, 18-70mm, 12-24mm. Maxed out 15" MBP
javabear90 is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:42 AM   #11
zach
macrumors 65816
 
zach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Send a message via AIM to zach Send a message via MSN to zach Send a message via Yahoo to zach Send a message via Skype™ to zach
Eh, it looks okay...

All except for the frikkin graphics cards. I don't want no slow Nvidia 5200 :X
__________________
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz
you, you're a history in rust
zach is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:43 AM   #12
Grimace
Contributor
 
Grimace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: with Hamburglar.
More PowerMac Choices

Okay - think about this: What if Apple INCREASED the choices of Powermacs?

2.6 Dual (or 2.5)
2.4 Single
2.2 Single
2.0 Dual
1.8 Dual
1.8 Single

I know it's not a concept they've done before, but maybe it would help clear out more of the old processors too.
Grimace is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:43 AM   #13
iGary
macrumors Demi-God
 
iGary's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: La Villa Strangiato
Translation:

No one has any idea what is about (or not about) to be released.
__________________
Mac Pro Octophallus 2.8 | 13" UMBP 2.26
iGary is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:44 AM   #14
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
sorry guys...

I guess we'll see...

arn
arn is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:45 AM   #15
keysersoze
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by carletonmusic
Wait a minute - why would those be considered updates?? WE ALREADY HAVE DUAL 2.0 AND 1.8GHZ POWERMACS.
Yeah, what's up with that?!? So one new machine? And they already killed a single 1.8....and now they bring it back?!?
__________________
i love brits

keysersoze is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:46 AM   #16
Savage Henry
macrumors 65816
 
Savage Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: in a one horse, two house, three pub town.
It's still a 25% mhz hike from last year,so it's not that bad. Just below exceptionally high and foolishly fed expectations.

__________________
Before a brilliant person begins something great, they must look foolish in the crowd.

From the I Ching
Savage Henry is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:47 AM   #17
LaMerVipere
macrumors 6502a
 
LaMerVipere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Send a message via AIM to LaMerVipere
I guess it's fine if all these models ship standard with the graphic cards listed, but obviously a BTO would be available.

If these were indeed the way the updates turn out i don't think it would spell well for something like an iMac G5 with say, single 1.8 & 2.0GHz options.
__________________
MacBook Pro + iPhone 3G
LaMerVipere is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:49 AM   #18
SFNE Freak
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CT
Send a message via AIM to SFNE Freak
Wow, if this is true, its gonna be one horrible update.
SFNE Freak is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:49 AM   #19
agentmouthwash
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
If I were Apple, I would eliminate the 1.? GHZ from the
Powermac line. It just looks better.

Release a
2.0 Ghz
2.6 Ghz bare
2.6 Ghz fully loaded.

save the 1.6 and 1.8 for the G5 Imac.

Oh yeah and release a pro Mouse, or my "mouse" money will
continue to go to Microsoft (intellimouse optical).

Last edited by agentmouthwash : Jun 8, 2004 at 09:52 AM.
agentmouthwash is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:49 AM   #20
Abstract
macrumors Demi-God
 
Abstract's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: It's classified.
Those are the most ridiculous numbers I've ever seen for a yearly update. Rumour or not, they're ridiculous numbers for anybody to be throwing around.

So let me get this straight, after an entire year, Apple is still including an Nvidia 5200 in their systems? Why? Its a cheap video card that you can pick up for cheap in any computer store. The mouse probably costs more than the video card.
__________________
"Oh, I've always wanted to touch Stanley," signs teacher Fran Zakoor, embracing the kids… ESPN Article, 04/09/2008
Abstract is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:51 AM   #21
mymemory
Banned
 
mymemory's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Miami
I do not have the money any way and for what I need a dual G4 would do. There are a bunch of After Effects plugins not yet for OSX.
mymemory is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:53 AM   #22
klaus
macrumors 6502a
 
klaus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Belgium
Quote:
Originally Posted by keysersoze
Yeah, what's up with that?!? So one new machine? And they already killed a single 1.8....and now they bring it back?!?

Well, that's an excellent point, and besides that, thinksecret also states the 'older' models (all 3 of them) will be sold with discounted prices..

but the processor speed is the same, graphics card also (I think), so what is going to be the difference between the 2 duals 1.8 & 2.0??????

I don't think apple will announce these models, it doesn't seem right, maybe after 5 months, but not 12 months!

only time will tell I guess
klaus is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:53 AM   #23
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
Thumbs up Apple controls the Ghz IBM produces

Oh wait, they don't. Still... don't forget to blame Apple for IBM's low G5 yields and GHz.

And don't forget to suggest that IBM's challenges are permanent, will never go away, that IBM will never compete with Intel, and Apple needs to go x86

Fun having lots of more-likely rumors this week, even if they only come a day ahead
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:54 AM   #24
g30ffr3y
macrumors 6502a
 
g30ffr3y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: buffalo ny
Send a message via AIM to g30ffr3y
i would think apple would let the airtunes airport express splash screen
last a little longer than one day...

i still wouldnt be suprised to just see the new powermacs at WWDC...

if the "update" did contain most of what we already have it would
be pretty disappointing from a company that prides itself on innovating
and suprising its loyal followers...

im not going to complain about the 3ghz promise... but i wont settle
either... its not that i even need that power... its just that ive mentally
decided that 3ghz is the magic number... anything else wouldnt be
exactly what i want so the wait continues...

maybe... since it doesnt seem like anyone really knows anything...
__________________
933 quicksilver gig ram
gig tibook gig ram

01.29.04 begin
01.29.07 engage
05.17.08 forever
g30ffr3y is offline  
Old Jun 8, 2004, 09:55 AM   #25
Soire
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garden State
I think if these revised estimates prove to be true, we are all going to band together in an angry mob and storm Cupertino with torches and pitchforks.

Most of us want that Rev. B and have held our breaths for a whole year. 365 days of waiting and that's what we get? Say it isn't so!
Soire is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC