Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors' Page 2 News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Jul 15, 2009, 03:55 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iPod Classic's Future in Doubt Due to Shrinking Market for 1.8" Hard Drives?



iPodNN reports that Samsung and Toshiba, the only remaining manufacturers of 1.8-inch hard drives, are having difficulties finding substantial markets for their drives. The issues are casting doubt on the future of Apple's iPod classic, which utilizes 120-GB versions of the drives.
Quote:
A new 250GB Samsung drive has failed to find significant sales, despite being deliberately marketed at builders of media players and netbooks.

The drive would not be as important if a 240GB Toshiba unit, released 10 months ago, was not also in a similar situation. Samsung and Toshiba are the only remaining makers of 1.8-inch hard drives, and if neither company is able to find establish a client base, it may imply by extension that Classics will no longer see any hard drive upgrades.
Apple last updated the iPod classic in September 2008, quietly consolidating the previous 80-GB and 160-GB models into a single 120-GB model. Apple's iPod touch currently tops out at 32 GB of storage, and while many expect that Apple will bump its capacity to 64 GB later this year, users focused on large capacities for on-the-go media storage may be disappointed if Apple is forced to discontinue the iPod classic.

Article Link: iPod Classic's Future in Doubt Due to Shrinking Market for 1.8" Hard Drives?
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:01 PM   #2
Pugpuppydude
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Utah
Spinning hardrives are old technology.
Pugpuppydude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:05 PM   #3
no.1 Apple Fan
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: In a pineapple under the sea
Please don't discontinue the Classic, Apple! First of all, It is the one iPod that represents the original iPods and second, it is great for those of us who have a huge music collection.
__________________
Go !!!!
MacBook Pro Late 2008 2.4 gHZ, iPod Classic 120 gig, Apple Wireless Mighty Mouse, Time Capsule 1 tb, Wacom Bamboo Pen and Touch
no.1 Apple Fan
no.1 Apple Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:05 PM   #4
toxictrix
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pugpuppydude View Post
Spinning hardrives are old technology.
Yes, but what do you expect us to do when we have huge music libraries? I want to carry all my music with me on an ipod. Until flash gets up to around 120 gigs I like my old spinning hard drive ipod.
toxictrix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:13 PM   #5
appleguy123
macrumors 6502a
 
appleguy123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
What about the macbook air harddrives?
__________________
Wind.-32bit extension to a 16bit graphicalshell for an 8bit operating system made for a 4bit cpu by a 2bit company that cant stand 1bit of competition
appleguy123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:14 PM   #6
slu
macrumors 6502a
 
slu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo
Capacity topping out at 64GB would be a travesty and a step backward.

IMO, this would be a huge mistake.
__________________
Rev A. iMac G5 / iPod classic 160 GB / Macbook 2.4 C2D / 3G iPhone
slu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:15 PM   #7
3247
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Germany
My guess is that Apple will discontinue the iPod classic when the iPod touch reaches more than 100 GB. This might already happen this year.
3247 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:18 PM   #8
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
Definitely going to need higher density flash memory if you're going to replace the 1.8" drive.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:18 PM   #9
ravenvii
macrumors 68040
 
ravenvii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melenkurion Skyweir
My guess is that Apple will continue the iPod Classic for one more year. By next September the iPod touch should have 64 GB + 128 GB configurations. Apple will nix the Classic then.

Hell, or maybe they will keep the Classic, but stick a SDD drive in there instead.
__________________
You spoony bard!
ravenvii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:24 PM   #10
Demosthenes X
macrumors 65816
 
Demosthenes X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Netbooks are huge sellers, so I'm surprised that 1.8" format drives aren't doing so well. One would expect all of the netbooker makers would be clamouring to offer a 250GB netbook...

Do 1.8" drives still top out at 4200RPM? Maybe that's the problem - perhaps instead of concentrating on higher capacity, the manufacturers should concentrate on higher performance. If 1.8" drives could reliably run at 5400RPM (or even 7200RPM!), just imagine the impact on notebook computers.
__________________
13" MacBook Pro: Pissing off elitist Mac users since 2009!
Demosthenes X is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:27 PM   #11
nick9191
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Britain
How much does the 1.8" SSD in the MacBook Air cost? I mean the jump from the $1499 model to the $1799 model gets you the 128gb SSD and a faster processor. Surely Apple could chuck together an iPod Classic or a thicker iPod Touch with this SSD for under $400.
__________________
There are some customers which we chose not to serve. We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk, and our DNA will not let us ship that. - Jobs
nick9191 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:28 PM   #12
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
I've learned how to fit "all" my music on a limited iPhone via smart playlists that keep the stuff I NEED present always, and that also cycle through the rest so every song gets its turn in the shuffle. You can get as sophisticated as you like with that.

So I suspect the market who REALLY needs a huge library is not big, and that most of them already have an iPod that they can keep using for a time.

Just long enough for a 128 GB iPod Touch to be practical

(Or better yet, 128 GB iPhone.)
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:43 PM   #13
dona83
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Burnaby BC
Orb

I have Orb installed on my work PC (Mac version not available yet, luckily my employer doesn't mind me using a bit of bandwidth out of office hours) which allows me full access to music, videos, even a TV tuner via a 3G connection on my iPhone. Sure it's not the best quality but to have access to more media than the iPod Classic can hold = win. Being able to watch a live hockey game fed from OTA = double win.
dona83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:45 PM   #14
mogzieee
macrumors 6502a
 
mogzieee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Oxford, UK.
Looks to me like the end of life for the original-design iPod is nigh.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro 2.4GHz, 8GB iPod touch, 1GB iPod shuffle, MobileMe.
website. blog. twitter.
mogzieee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:52 PM   #15
zedsdead
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
The Macbook Air will be all SSD by the next refresh.

As for the Classic, I think Apple will try to milk another year out of it, but that's it.
__________________
iMac 27: 2.8 Core i7 Quad, 2TB, 8 gigs of RAM, ATI 4850
Macbook Pro: 2.4 Core2Duo, 128 SSD, 4 gigs of RAM, NVIDIA 9400/9600
iPhone 3G S⃣ ; Apple TV; Final Cut Studio 2.5, Logic, Drobo, EyeTV
zedsdead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 04:57 PM   #16
timerollson
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Damn. This sucks. I just reached 100GB of music on my hard drive. Plus, I'm re-downloading everything in EAC/VBR. Damn.
timerollson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:01 PM   #17
Stridder44
macrumors 68040
 
Stridder44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: California
Quote:
Originally Posted by toxictrix View Post
Yes, but what do you expect us to do when we have huge music libraries? I want to carry all my music with me on an ipod. Until flash gets up to around 120 gigs I like my old spinning hard drive ipod.

Thank you! Some of us love the classic design with its huge capacity.

God I hope it doesn't go away.
__________________
The Un-Funny Truth About Scientology
(Warning: Graphic images)

MacBook Pro 15.4"/2.5 GHz/250GB/4GB RAM
iMac G4 17"/800 Mhz/80GB/512GB RAM
Stridder44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:07 PM   #18
dwman
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stridder44 View Post
Thank you! Some of us love the classic design with its huge capacity.

God I hope it doesn't go away.
I love the classic model, but 240GB of media?? Seriously, who needs to carry that much capacity on their persons at all times. In time, the flash drives will get up to 120GB +, but it will take a while.
__________________
MBP 2.2 SR 4GB RAM
5.5G 30 GB iPod
2ndG 4GB iPod Nano
16 GB iPhone 3G
dwman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:10 PM   #19
scooterbaga
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by iVoid View Post
I think what's interesting is that being music only, the Classic really doesn't need to be much bigger, so there's not a lot of people nagging Apple for a 240GB version.
Wrong on a few levels there...

People have been 'nagging' for the 240 Classic since the drive went into production. Also... 'music only' ...Are you serious? I watch videos from my Classic on a daily basis.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwman View Post
I love the classic model, but 240GB of media?? Seriously, who needs to carry that much capacity on their persons at all times. In time, the flash drives will get up to 120GB +, but it will take a while.
More capacity = More options

Last I heard having more options is better than having less of them. The Classic is a powerhouse in its own right. It should stick around.
__________________
--
scooterbaga

Last edited by scooterbaga : Jul 15, 2009 at 05:16 PM.
scooterbaga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:12 PM   #20
Shadow
macrumors 68000
 
Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Keele, United Kingdom
Send a message via MSN to Shadow
Quote:
Originally Posted by zedsdead View Post
The Macbook Air will be all SSD by the next refresh.

As for the Classic, I think Apple will try to milk another year out of it, but that's it.
I dunno, I still don't think SSDs are cheap enough to justify putting them in all MBAs. A 64GB Samsung SSD is still almost £100 (or $164.525 for those across the pond) whereas a 1TB Hitatchi Deskstar is only £60 ($98.715). Regardless of the fact that the SSD is 2.5" and the HD is 3.5", the price difference is massive considering the difference in capacity.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.66GHz 4GB 500GB 9600m (mid 2009)
MacBook 320GB 2GB 9400m (early 2009)
iPod touch 1G 16GB
Time Capsule 500GB + WD MyBook 320GB NAS
Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:14 PM   #21
brendanspah764
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
It would be very sad to see the iPod Classic go. Like everyone is saying, it represents the very first iPod in 2001 and the evolution of the iPod. I don't think Apple would have it go.

But what I think is that Apple should try to bring it back up. I do not want to see it go touchscreen because the clickwheel is the icon of the iPod (with exception of the iPod touch and the iPod shuffle). I have always wanted an iPod touch with a hard drive, but it never happened.

I know this is only a rumor, but PLEASE APPLE!
__________________
8GB iPod Nano 4G Silver
16GB iPod Nano 5G Blue
eMac 1.25 GHz Combo Drive 1GB RAM
brendanspah764 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:15 PM   #22
zombitronic
macrumors 6502a
 
zombitronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by no.1 Apple Fan View Post
It is the one iPod that represents the original iPods
I don't think that's a good enough reason to not EOL it. Apple seems to be all for evolution, even if it means scrapping old iconic hardware. The original Macintosh was an iconic computer but it didn't stay around forever. They have to advance their hardware even if it means changing the image of a device.
zombitronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:37 PM   #23
longofest
Demi-God (Editor)
 
longofest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Falls Church, VA
Send a message via AIM to longofest
I was just recently thinking that this September's refresh could be about the end for the classic. The touch should definitely get a boost to 64 GB which will cover most users' needs, so the classic would really be relegated to just the relative few users that need uber-storage in their portable player.
longofest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:37 PM   #24
walnuts
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Mineola, NY
I would be really curious to see a poll on this topic. After having an iPhone for a while (and ceasing to use my 5.5G, despite its ample space), I got used to having less space. I now feel like I have plenty of room in my 32GB 3GS (my music is about 20 gigs of that, leaving 10 for videos and apps). My point is this: are there enough people out there who have really large music collection, have their music in ultra high enough quality, or must have many hours of video with them at all times to have a marketable voice?
walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 15, 2009, 05:47 PM   #25
jeffy.dee-lux
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: montreal
I use a 30Gig 5G ipod for music only. Since i walk or bike everywhere, I can't see myself watching videos on a portable device any time soon. That's why I think they should continue to offer a flash based classic iPod, without the touch screen and wifi capabilities, to offer something cheaper for those of us who just want to bring our music around.

If they could pull of a 64Gig flash based iPod classic, I'd be all over that. Don't flash drives offer better battery performance anyways?

Anyway, I've only just hit the 30gig limit with my music library. I can deal with picking and choosing and a bit of music culling for the time being. There's some stuff I simply don't need to hear anymore.
jeffy.dee-lux is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors' Page 2 News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC