Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ahoover

macrumors member
May 11, 2004
77
28
Order Date Change

Changed my order for my 2.5DPG5 CTO from an ATI Rad9800 XT to a NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra DDL and my order status/ship date stayed the same "On or Before 07/30/2004".

:)
 

gekko513

macrumors 603
Oct 16, 2003
6,301
1
phonic pol said:
Hey, the apple store is down for updates in the UK!
The norwegian store was down earlier ... the only change I can find is that the 17" display is gone from the display summary.

Edit: And you now need to go to Accessories -> Displays to find the 17"
 

cynegils

macrumors newbie
Jul 6, 2004
3
0
Shipping time... not now.

Macrumors said:
The Dual 2.5GHz PowerMac is due to ship in late July.

Ummm.... no.

07/01/2004
11:23 AM PST W8649482
•*2.5DPG5 CTO •*IPOD 15G-USA •*APPLE CIN DISPLAY 20" FLAT PANEL-USA
Partially Shipped
2.5DPG5 CTO- Open Est. Ship 08/31/2004


Which means I'll have this September.
Cynegils
 

Freg3000

macrumors 68000
Sep 22, 2002
1,914
0
New York
cynegils said:
Ummm.... no.

07/01/2004
11:23 AM PST W8649482
•*2.5DPG5 CTO •*IPOD 15G-USA •*APPLE CIN DISPLAY 20" FLAT PANEL-USA
Partially Shipped
2.5DPG5 CTO- Open Est. Ship 08/31/2004


Which means I'll have this September.
Cynegils

Perhaps not your machine which seems to have been ordered recently, but the Dual 2.5 GHz Power Macs which were ordered immediately after they became available are still slated to ship in late July.
 

BWhaler

macrumors 68040
Jan 8, 2003
3,788
6,244
cynegils said:
Ummm.... no.

07/01/2004
11:23 AM PST W8649482
•*2.5DPG5 CTO •*IPOD 15G-USA •*APPLE CIN DISPLAY 20" FLAT PANEL-USA
Partially Shipped
2.5DPG5 CTO- Open Est. Ship 08/31/2004


Which means I'll have this September.
Cynegils

My PM2.5 ships 7/27.

You are able to distinguish between YOUR shipping date and the date Apple has the model available, right? I suspect you placed your order in the past week...
 

gekko513

macrumors 603
Oct 16, 2003
6,301
1
Freg3000 said:
Perhaps not your machine which seems to have been ordered recently, but the Dual 2.5 GHz Power Macs which were ordered immediately after they became available are still slated to ship in late July.
So does this mean that Apple has received so many orders for Dual 2.5GHz PowerMacs that they now suddenly have a one month backlog, and if that is the case, is it because of a lack of CPU able to run at 2.5 GHz or a lack of 6800 cards??

Edit: Oh ... obviously because of a lack of 6800 cards since Dual 2.5GHz PowerMacs with some other card still ship in July.
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,937
157
Actually it is the changes that Apple made to the machines this time around that are the most interesting part of these developer notes, and I'm not talking about the LCS.

And the DP 1.8 G5 PowerMac comparison (look at what Apple did to the PCI slots) shows some movement in an interesting direction, that is if you think about machine that is missing right now, and Apple is willing to go back to that type of design.
 

gekko513

macrumors 603
Oct 16, 2003
6,301
1
Sun Baked said:
Actually it is the changes that Apple made to the machines this time around that are the most interesting part of these developer notes, and I'm not talking about the LCS.

And the DP 1.8 G5 PowerMac comparison (look at what Apple did to the PCI slots) shows some movement in an interesting direction if you think of another machine that is missing right now, if Apple is willing to go back to that type of design.
Isn't that just like the old single 1.6 G5 PowerMac? I don't think Apple is going back in any way, they've just added another processor and upped the clock of the cheapest model.
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,937
157
gekko513 said:
Isn't that just like the old single 1.6 G5 PowerMac? I don't think Apple is going back in any way, they've just added another processor and upped the clock of the cheapest model.
There seems to have been a design change (look at what Apple did to the PCI.)

The SP 1.6/1.8 machines did not use a board with this change, they looked quite a bit like their big brothers.
 

gekko513

macrumors 603
Oct 16, 2003
6,301
1
Sun Baked said:
There seems to have been a design change (look at what Apple did to the PCI.)

The SP 1.6/1.8 machines did not use a board with this change, they looked quite a bit like their big brothers.
Are you sure? This is from the old notes: "In some configurations of the Power Mac G5, one slot runs at a maximum of 133 MHz and two slots run at a maximum of 100 MHz. In other configurations of the Power Mac G5 computer, all three slots run at 33 MHz." The old 1.6 had only PCI.
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,937
157
gekko513 said:
Are you sure? This is from the old notes: "In some configurations of the Power Mac G5, one slot runs at a maximum of 133 MHz and two slots run at a maximum of 100 MHz. In other configurations of the Power Mac G5 computer, all three slots run at 33 MHz." The old 1.6 had only PCI.
:rolleyes:

You are reading the text NOT looking at the picture.

Compare the two pictures, and try to figure out what Apple did with the PCI.

This may help...
 

Attachments

  • Comparison OldvsNew.jpg
    Comparison OldvsNew.jpg
    91.2 KB · Views: 1,047

gekko513

macrumors 603
Oct 16, 2003
6,301
1
Sun Baked said:
:rolleyes:

You are reading the text NOT looking at the picture.

Compare the two pictures, and try to figure out what Apple did with the PCI.

This may help...
I don't believe the rightmost picture applies to the 1.6 ... the 1.6 had only 4 DIMM slots and no PCI-X ... no need for a PCI-X bridge when there are no PCI-X slots either
 

thatwendigo

macrumors 6502a
Nov 17, 2003
992
0
Sum, Ergo Sum.
Sun Baked said:
:rolleyes:

You are reading the text NOT looking at the picture.

Compare the two pictures, and try to figure out what Apple did with the PCI.

This may help...

Actually, I think the block diagrams are for the higher models with PCI-X, but the low end never really has had it. That would mean that the 1.8 Revision B model is actually using the same I/O system as the older 1.6 Revision A. There's no change at all, aside from the processor socketing and memory control for the dual system.

Lowendmac shows that the 1.6 single had 33mhz PCI slots, and not 100 or 133mhz PCI-X, incidentally.
 

Sun Baked

macrumors G5
May 19, 2002
14,937
157
gekko513 said:
I don't believe the rightmost picture applies to the 1.6 ... the 1.6 had only 4 DIMM slots and no PCI-X ... no need for a PCI-X bridge when there are no PCI-X slots either
That's your choice. :(

Especially when there is a lot of evidence to support the fact the bridge controller was a PCI/PCI-X HT Tunnel.
 

aussiemac86

macrumors 6502
Apr 12, 2004
261
0
the land of OZ
late July :(

I was told by the reseller i ordered through they would have my dual 2.5 in 2-4 weeks, and that was the last week of june.....i suppose i was just hoping it would be closer to the 2 weeks than the 4 weeks
 
Sun Baked said:
:rolleyes:

You are reading the text NOT looking at the picture.

Compare the two pictures, and try to figure out what Apple did with the PCI.

This may help...

weird... not that I know enough to interpret any of this, but it SEEMS like the old version... the PCI stuff, as you said, and also half the space for memory....

???

wouldn't the old one be better, by these pictures?
 

recursivejon

macrumors regular
Jul 6, 2004
176
0
New York
Still shipping 7/30

Both my friend Doug and I ordered 2.5MP's within a week of their release last month, then following the WWDC announcement we both upgraded our graphics cards to Nvidia GF 6800 Ultra DDL's. He also ordered a 30" Cinema, which is shipping "on or before" 8/31, but both of our CPU ship dates are still "on or before" 7/30.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.