|Jul 17, 2002, 05:43 PM||#1|
iMac -- Why no increase in system bus speed?
The iMac's system bus speed has been stuck at 100mHz for nearly two years. I suppose it won't get bumped up to 133mHz until after the system bus speed for the PowerMac line gets an increase.
How difficult would it be for Apple to increase the bus speed of the iMac? Would they have to redesign the motherboard? And is an L3 cache completely out of the question?
Does anybody think there's a chance will see an iMac with a 1gHz processor and 133mHz system bus at MWSF?
On edit: actually, I think it's been MORE than two years since the last increase in system bus speed. I think the original iMac had a 66mHz system bus, which was bumped up to 100mHz when the slot-loading drive iMac was introduced in late 1999.
Last edited by dolstein; Jul 17, 2002 at 05:53 PM.
|Jul 17, 2002, 05:56 PM||#2|
RE: Why no increase
because then they couldn't overcharge you for old technology.
It would probably cost a jumbo amount to add faster bus and L3 cache. Their chance to change all of that was when they designed the new iMac the first time.
|Jul 17, 2002, 06:48 PM||#3|
How about, if the iMac was that good, how would you get people to buy the Pro line up?
Well gentlemen, a great deal of money has been invested in this project...
...and we can't allow it to fail.
File Under - METAL
|Jul 17, 2002, 06:59 PM||#4|
There are plenty of other things that differentiate PowerMacs from iMacs. PowerMacs are expandable and, except for some overlap between the hi-end iMacs and low-end PowerMacs, have faster processors and better graphics chips. You also have more flexible display options with the PowerMac.
I believe there may have been a brief period of time when both the iMacs and the PowerMacs had the same bus speed. But I suspect that the iMacs won't get a bump until the PowerMacs do. I still think two and a half years is a VERY long time to go without a bump in the system bus speed.
|Jul 17, 2002, 09:36 PM||#5|
Re: iMac -- Why no increase in system bus speed?
i am ok with apple's consumer offerings with a 17" inch lcd imac on the desktop end and an ibook as low as $1199
but the pro users have to get much faster processors (1.2-1.5 ghz with dual options) and it would be nice if tibook was 1 ghz already
right now, for pro end stuff, the pc looks to have the better value...that is until mac starts making headway for ddr ram and an honest attempt towards 2 ghz over next year or less
i know that sounds optimistic, but i do fully expect the ddr ram and faster bus by january
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|No Mouse in System preferences||nambuccaheadsau||Mac OS X 10.7 Lion||7||Sep 9, 2011 11:21 PM|
|Why no stars in photos taken in space?||leekohler||Community Discussion||21||Apr 30, 2010 06:22 PM|
|iMac 24" – why no video-in?||irishgrizzly||iMac||37||Sep 26, 2007 12:59 PM|
|24" iMac -- Why the 7300GT?||vv-tim||iMac||32||Sep 7, 2006 04:24 PM|
|why no G5 in Xserves, too hot?||dornball||Macintosh Computers||13||Jun 29, 2003 08:21 PM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 PM.