Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 2, 2009, 12:10 AM   #1
eddiek
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Memory upgrade for 2009 Mac Pro

I have a '09 2.26 octo with 6 gb ram standard. I'm finally deciding to upgrade the RAM but don't want to spend a ton if possible. Is there a benefit/downside to just upgrading 1-2gb stick or 2-2gbs as opposed to replacing all of the 1gb sticks with 2 gb sticks? I've seen the benchmarks for the various memory configs but nothing where things get added piecemeal. Thx.
eddiek is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2009, 12:19 AM   #2
gugucom
macrumors 68020
 
gugucom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Munich, Germany
The way I understand the technology the reasonable options are 6, 12, 24 GB. All other configs are detrimental to optimum speed. This because both CPUs have three QPIs which means everything goes by 6. As you can only have 1, 2 or 4 GB sticks at reasonable cost those are the preferred options.
__________________
MP4,1●3,33GHz Octad●2*160GB SSD●12GB RAM●Blu-Ray●FireDTV-S2●SL/Vista64
uMBP●SL/Vista64
TC 2TB iPhone●16GB
gugucom is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2009, 12:28 AM   #3
nullx86
macrumors 6502a
 
nullx86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wilmington/Jacksonville, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiek View Post
I have a '09 2.26 octo with 6 gb ram standard. I'm finally deciding to upgrade the RAM but don't want to spend a ton if possible. Is there a benefit/downside to just upgrading 1-2gb stick or 2-2gbs as opposed to replacing all of the 1gb sticks with 2 gb sticks? I've seen the benchmarks for the various memory configs but nothing where things get added piecemeal. Thx.
When the i7s came out, they added tri-channel, instead of dual channel. So with dual channel you'd want stuff in pairs (example: 4GB would either be 2X2GB or 4X1GB). With tri-channel, its the same concept, just in threes (3x2GB = 6GB, 6x2GB = 12GB, 3x1GB=3GB, 6x1GB=6GB and so on). Tri and dual channel are way better if you are running some intensive apps like Photoshop. If you just randomly add memory and lose tri-channel, your going to hurt yourself when you try to do some intensive apps.
__________________
12" iBook G4 1.07Ghz, 512MB, 40GB, 10.5.8
"He was probably just playing out some crazy anime fantasy. When life gives you lemons...horribly maim and murder someone" - Unspoken Demise
nullx86 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 2, 2009, 12:48 AM   #4
eddiek
Thread Starter
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
So pretty much from what I'm gathering here, there's no significant benefit to adding 4gb via 2x2gb sticks and just going 12 gb instead via 6x2gb? I guess the difference is $113 for 2x2 vs. $326 to replace all of them?
eddiek is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac Pro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Memory upgrades in a 6 core upgrade mikeyg36 Mac Pro 6 May 22, 2011 08:49 PM
Storage for the Mac Pro tower quidire Mac Pro 4 Feb 2, 2011 11:40 AM
Newegg memory for 2009 Mac Pro StormImpact Mac Pro 7 May 9, 2009 10:20 PM
Upgrading consideration for 2009 Mac Pro (future proofing too) MCHR Mac Pro 25 Mar 18, 2009 09:56 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC