Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
64-Bit UNIX????? Huh?
- Thread starter ingenious
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
crazzyeddie
macrumors 68030
It has certain libraries that are 64-bit enabled for G5 computers. This mainly allows them to access more RAM for applications (specifically those related to Unix). On a G3/G4, that amount of RAM isn't even possible, so it doesn't apply. Plus on those computers, a 32-bit version of the library would be used.
Sayer
macrumors 6502a
There are already G4-specific versions of various functions in Mac OS X and Mac OS 9 that speed up things only when AltiVec is present.
The 64-bit libraries are no different, on a G5 they can be used transparently by any app via enhanced APIs or specifically via special libraries to access more memory.
The same goes for Core Graphics and Core Image which degrade gracefully as the hardware capabilities drops. For example with Quartz Extreme-supported graphics cards the arrow cursor has a shadow while on lower-end Macs with lesser graphics the arrow has no shadow.
In the end the OS "just works" on whichever hardware it runs on. And software can adapt or require a G4 or G5 as they have since the PowerPC replaced the 68k processors in the mid 90's.
The 64-bit libraries are no different, on a G5 they can be used transparently by any app via enhanced APIs or specifically via special libraries to access more memory.
The same goes for Core Graphics and Core Image which degrade gracefully as the hardware capabilities drops. For example with Quartz Extreme-supported graphics cards the arrow cursor has a shadow while on lower-end Macs with lesser graphics the arrow has no shadow.
In the end the OS "just works" on whichever hardware it runs on. And software can adapt or require a G4 or G5 as they have since the PowerPC replaced the 68k processors in the mid 90's.
