Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > iPhone and iPod Touch Forums > App Store
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread  
Old Oct 15, 2009, 03:21 PM   #1
PBF
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Let's compile all iPhone-to-iPhone messaging apps here!

WhatsApp

Status: Released
Price: $0.99
Link: www.appshopper.com/social-networking/whatsapp
Website: www.whatsapp.com
Developer: Jan Koum

Ping!

Status: Released
Price: $0.99
Link: www.appshopper.com/social-networking/ping-4
Website: www.pingmessaging.com
Developer: Gary Fung

Blipr

Status: Released
Price: $0.99
Link: www.appshopper.com/entertainment/blipr
Website: www.return7.com
Developer: Amro Mousa & Andrew Conner

BuzzMe!

Status: Released
Price: Free
Link: www.appshopper.com/social-networking/buzzme
Website: www.zimmelus.com/apps/BuzzMe.html
Developer: Michael Zimmermann

pMessenger

Status: Released
Price: $0.99
Link: http://www.appshopper.com/social-net...nger-with-push
Website: www.pmessenger.net
Developer: fedj

iPM

Status: Released
Price: $0.99
Link: www.appshopper.com/social-networking/ipm-2
Website: http://web.me.com/ipm4iphone
Developer: SAG3194

MessageNow

Status: Released
Price: Free
Link: www.appshopper.com/social-networking/messagenow
Website: www.enflick.com
Developer: Derek Ting

Flow Messenger

Status: Released
Price: Free
Link: http://www.appshopper.com/social-net...flow-messenger
Website: www.flowmessenger.com
Developer: Vincent Young

iMessenger
Status: Unreleased
Price:
Link:
Website: www.imessengerapp.com
Developer: iMessengerApp

Last edited by PBF : Nov 17, 2009 at 01:14 PM.
PBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 04:36 PM   #2
nburwell
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Send a message via AIM to nburwell
There is also U SMS which was developed and released by Derek of Enflick.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.2GHz l iPod video (3rd gen) l iPhone 3G 16GB l 5D l L glass l Manfrotto
nburwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 05:04 PM   #3
Almy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
To me this is a case where competition actually hurts the intent. It needs to be one app that all devices have, otherwise it's just a bunch of other IM programs that aren't cross platform like gtalk and others.

I hope one is successful, but several just drown each other out.
Almy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 05:06 PM   #4
return7
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Blipr -- but it's more about sounds (although it does the messaging too). http://return7.com for screenshots.
return7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 06:04 PM   #5
QCassidy352
Contributor
 
QCassidy352's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almy View Post
To me this is a case where competition actually hurts the intent. It needs to be one app that all devices have, otherwise it's just a bunch of other IM programs that aren't cross platform like gtalk and others.

I hope one is successful, but several just drown each other out.
absolutely right. This category of messaging apps is already limited to a) iphones, and b) iphone users who want an iphone-to-iphone app. Now that's further broken down in to all of these separate apps... how many people you going to be able to contact with any given one of these apps?
__________________
"If Jesus Himself came back to earth and turned water to wine, half of MacRumors would say 'meh, this is red. I wanted white.'"
QCassidy352 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 06:38 PM   #6
srl7741
macrumors Demi-God
 
srl7741's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Send a message via AIM to srl7741 Send a message via Yahoo to srl7741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Almy View Post
To me this is a case where competition actually hurts the intent. It needs to be one app that all devices have, otherwise it's just a bunch of other IM programs that aren't cross platform like gtalk and others.

I hope one is successful, but several just drown each other out.
You kind of have a good point. Seems they could end up killing off each other and not being a big hit.
__________________
MRooogle - Advanced MacRumors searching using Google.
srl7741 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 09:51 PM   #7
PBF
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by nburwell View Post
There is also U SMS which was developed and released by Derek of Enflick.
That's not a BBM type of messaging app. It's another SMS app like Textfree Unlimited by Pinger.
PBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 10:33 PM   #8
mebx86
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
One will eventually reign among all others and the others will desist and a winner will be declared. It'll be interesting to see which one comes out victorious! Let the battle begin
mebx86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 10:34 PM   #9
sidewinder
macrumors 6502a
 
sidewinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBF View Post
That's not a BBM type of messaging app. It's another SMS app like Textfree Unlimited by Pinger.
Actually, it does both. iPhone to iPhone conversations do not go through any SMS gateway.

S-
__________________
Mac Pro: 8-core 2.8 GHz, 10GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.1; iPhone 3G S⃣ 32GB
sidewinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 10:53 PM   #10
mebx86
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Can't wait to check iMessenger out!! It's the ONLY one with Message Delivery n Message Read notification status
mebx86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 11:08 PM   #11
PBF
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewinder View Post
Actually, it does both. iPhone to iPhone conversations do not go through any SMS gateway.

S-
I want this thread to contain apps specially designated for use amongst iPhone users only, please.

And yes, I am aware of the existence of such wonderful apps as Beejive, IM+, Textfree Unlimited, Unlimited SMS, etc. But they don't quite fit into this thread.
PBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 11:12 PM   #12
PBF
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by return7 View Post
Blipr -- but it's more about sounds (although it does the messaging too). http://return7.com for screenshots.
Interesting. I'm following you on Twitter. Thanks.
PBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 11:49 PM   #13
bozzykid
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mebx86 View Post
One will eventually reign among all others and the others will desist and a winner will be declared. It'll be interesting to see which one comes out victorious! Let the battle begin
The audience for this feature is so small, you will never find one totally dominate the market. Since it is only iPhone to iPhone, it is very limited and what you use will probably have more to do with what your friends use than anything else. These apps will never get a huge install base until they work across multiple platforms. Personally, SMS and IM work best for me since everyone I know has at least one of these on their phone (and many IM networks can work through SMS too) and certainly not everyone I know uses an iPhone either.
bozzykid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 15, 2009, 11:57 PM   #14
return7
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBF View Post
Interesting. I'm following you on Twitter. Thanks.
Yep, we submitted it this past Sunday. We're guessing it'll be another week or two before it's approved.
return7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 12:56 AM   #15
sidewinder
macrumors 6502a
 
sidewinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBF View Post
I want this thread to contain apps specially designated for use amongst iPhone users only, please.

And yes, I am aware of the existence of such wonderful apps as Beejive, IM+, Textfree Unlimited, Unlimited SMS, etc. But they don't quite fit into this thread.
Two things:

1. I was not the one that brought up Unlimited SMS. I just commented on a reference to it.

2. Just because you start a thread does not mean you get to tell people what they can and can not do in it.

S-
__________________
Mac Pro: 8-core 2.8 GHz, 10GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.1; iPhone 3G S⃣ 32GB
sidewinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 12:58 AM   #16
sidewinder
macrumors 6502a
 
sidewinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Northern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by bozzykid View Post
The audience for this feature is so small, you will never find one totally dominate the market. Since it is only iPhone to iPhone, it is very limited and what you use will probably have more to do with what your friends use than anything else. These apps will never get a huge install base until they work across multiple platforms. Personally, SMS and IM work best for me since everyone I know has at least one of these on their phone (and many IM networks can work through SMS too) and certainly not everyone I know uses an iPhone either.
Absolutely spot on!

S-
__________________
Mac Pro: 8-core 2.8 GHz, 10GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.1; iPhone 3G S⃣ 32GB
sidewinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 01:11 AM   #17
PBF
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by sidewinder View Post
Two things:

1. I was not the one that brought up Unlimited SMS. I just commented on a reference to it.

2. Just because you start a thread does not mean you get to tell people what they can and can not do in it.

S-
1. Excuse my inattentiveness.

2. Actually, you're right. Freedom of Speech is one of the rights from the First Amendment after all.
PBF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 09:29 AM   #18
return7
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by PBF View Post
2. Actually, you're right. Freedom of Speech is one of the rights from the First Amendment after all.
This is a privately owned forum though so the First Amendment does not apply. The rules of the forum, however, do apply.
return7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 04:20 PM   #19
samcraig
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Here's what needs to happen. Someone with some savvy needs to create an app like beejive now. Sell it for $X, keep some and pay a fee to other application designers in exchange for using their code/servers so that it doesn't matter what bbm type messenger anyone has - they can have one or all of them (like yahoo, aim). Then this one app can be used to aggregate your buddylist in ONE place.

Granted - I don't think any of the developers will want to share their resources - but it would solve the issue...
samcraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 05:25 PM   #20
bozzykid
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
Here's what needs to happen. Someone with some savvy needs to create an app like beejive now. Sell it for $X, keep some and pay a fee to other application designers in exchange for using their code/servers so that it doesn't matter what bbm type messenger anyone has - they can have one or all of them (like yahoo, aim). Then this one app can be used to aggregate your buddylist in ONE place.

Granted - I don't think any of the developers will want to share their resources - but it would solve the issue...
You mean you want the app developers to re-create IM systems that already exists? What you just explained can already be done with jabber/xmpp servers.
bozzykid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 08:59 PM   #21
samcraig
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by bozzykid View Post
You mean you want the app developers to re-create IM systems that already exists? What you just explained can already be done with jabber/xmpp servers.
no

Each of these developers have created their own messaging "protocol" for their apps and utilize screennames/pin codes/etc.

What I'm saying is - someone should work with all of them and write an app which understands all the different methods so that I can buy one app to "rule them all"
samcraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 09:14 PM   #22
lostprophet894
macrumors 68030
 
lostprophet894's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: U.S.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
no

Each of these developers have created their own messaging "protocol" for their apps and utilize screennames/pin codes/etc.

What I'm saying is - someone should work with all of them and write an app which understands all the different methods so that I can buy one app to "rule them all"
Love this idea.

One screen name, one login, ability to chat across multiple platforms (kinda like Meebo, I guess).
__________________
Don't mind my sarcasm. I really am here to help.
lostprophet894 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 09:23 PM   #23
samcraig
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostprophet894 View Post
Love this idea.

One screen name, one login, ability to chat across multiple platforms (kinda like Meebo, I guess).
Ditto. But as I mentioned before - I don't see it happening because of trust and protectiveness.

All the developers would have to agree to split a percentage from the "master app" sale AND they would have to share their code/methods. I'm guessing each developer will not see the greater good in the idea and instead want to be protective and not share since they worked so hard on their app.

But again - If each developer were to charge .99 to 2.99 for their app and a master app could be built to speak to them all - I'd probably pay 9.99 or something to make sure I was able to speak across platforms...
samcraig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 09:27 PM   #24
lostprophet894
macrumors 68030
 
lostprophet894's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: U.S.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
Ditto. But as I mentioned before - I don't see it happening because of trust and protectiveness.

All the developers would have to agree to split a percentage from the "master app" sale AND they would have to share their code/methods. I'm guessing each developer will not see the greater good in the idea and instead want to be protective and not share since they worked so hard on their app.

But again - If each developer were to charge .99 to 2.99 for their app and a master app could be built to speak to them all - I'd probably pay 9.99 or something to make sure I was able to speak across platforms...
+1

Or they could just make it free!
__________________
Don't mind my sarcasm. I really am here to help.
lostprophet894 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 16, 2009, 09:39 PM   #25
bozzykid
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostprophet894 View Post
Love this idea.

One screen name, one login, ability to chat across multiple platforms (kinda like Meebo, I guess).
Again it sounds exactly like Jabber/XMPP. I really don't see this happening. If these developers really wanted to support more users, they could use a XMPP server and it would allow you to chat with Google Talk, Jabber, etc users. However, when you venture into becoming an IM system, then you will lose to apps like Beejive who have implemented these features already and are very mature.
bozzykid is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > iPhone and iPod Touch Forums > App Store

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC