|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
macrumors bot
Join Date: Apr 2001
|
Apple's New 27-Inch iMacs Experiencing Performance Issues?
![]() Engadget reports that Apple's discussion forums are starting to see reports of poor performance on the company's new 27-inch iMacs introduced last week. While users have reported several issues, including inappropriate spinning down of the hard drive and corrupted Snow Leopard installations, the primary complaint seems to be poor Flash performance. Quote:
Article Link: Apple's New 27-Inch iMacs Experiencing Performance Issues? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
|
doesn't flash play slowly on all macs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ Highlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
That is supposed to be a NEWS bit!?
It's known that the flash performance be it on Tiger, Leopard or SL is ABYSMAL. Nothing new. No pressure from Apple on Adobe either. ![]() For everyone who cares here's a bug thread on Adobe forums commenting heavily on the issue: http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-890 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
You don't know that..
I'm quite sure that Apple must be very annoyed at getting thousands of error reports a minute caused by Flash. Actually 95% of all error reports that get sent from my machine are caused by Flash.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
|
|
|
| peterdevries |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by peterdevries |
|
|
#7 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Quote:
Version: Flash Player 10 - 10_0_32_18 Steps to reproduce: 1. Go to hulu.com. Stream a TV show. Pop it out into a new window and play back at 2-3 times normal size 2. On a 2009 model Mac Pro with 8 Nehalem Xeon processors and 12 GB of RAM, flash uses 50% of all CPU time available, and uses all cores. In 10.5, CPU usage was substantially lower (monitor with activity monitor.) 3. There is no 3. Actual Results: CPU usage is the highest I have ever seen for video playback. For comparison, the same machine uses virtually no CPU playing back a 1080p video at full screen on a 2560x1600 display. Expected Results: CPU usage should not be high for this operation. If this were a laptop, the battery would be drained in a hurry. Compare to quicktime playback of just about any video format, or to Silverlight, for much better video playback performance. 50% CPU Usage on an Mac Pro with 8 Nehalm Processors and 12 Gigs of RAM! What chance do us "normal" Mac Users have? This is clearly an Adobe Screw-up! |
|
|
|
|
| MacDSmith2 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by MacDSmith2 |
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New Zealand
|
I fail to see how that can be a problem.
__________________
iMac 2.66Ghz 20inch w/ 4GB RAM; MacBook 'White Late 2008' w/ 4GB RAM; Mac OS X 10.6.2 'Snow Leopard'; 64GB iPod Touch; EyeTV Hybrid; 640GB Western Digital USB EXT Hard Disk |
|
|
|
| macintoshtoffy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by macintoshtoffy |
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Oct 2009
|
Flash performance on SL is just abysmal, no matter what machine you're using.
My unibody MB played flash without a hicup on Leopard... now, if I try and watch youtube it'll be about 45 seconds before the fans start to kick into high-gear. The processor percentages the flash plugin eats up are just astronomical. I'm assuming this is an Adobe issue, but who knows -- maybe it's some weird interaction with the 64-bit Safari? All I can say is that SL made me find, install, and fall in love with ClickToFlash! |
|
|
|
| thompson11 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by thompson11 |
|
|
#10 | |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Minneapolis
|
Quote:
Thanks! PS, who besides me thinks that its absolutely ridiculous that Microsoft Silverlight works so much better than flash on macs? Shame on Adobe. I don't even feel like using their products sometimes... but alas I must. Dreamweaver is just sooooooooo much better than iWeb, which has to be the worst editor out there. Macromedia would have never let this happen.
__________________
13" MacBook Pro 2.53 GHz, 4 GB, 500 GB HD ; 16 GB BLACK iPhone 3g ; 8 GB iPod Touch (2g)
Last edited by tempusfugit : Oct 30, 2009 at 02:27 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| tempusfugit |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by tempusfugit |
|
|
#11 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: New Zealand
|
Quote:
Flash is just abysmal, no matter what machine you're using.Flash has always been garbage, only marginally better than all the other formats like Windoze Muddier Video and RealUseless Player. The only proper way to to use video on a computer is QuickTime. |
|
|
|
|
| Buzz Bumble |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Buzz Bumble |
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: RI
|
There are about 30 "positive" ratings on this story on the front page. Can anyone tell me why? This seems to be a bad thing, and I don't know why anyone would give it a "positive"!
__________________
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as the fly by" -Douglas Adams 14"late 2003 ibook g4, 640 MB RAM, 90GB HD; 4GB iPod nano |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: RI
|
I don't know how to delete my posts, but I just edited out a repost here.
__________________
"I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as the fly by" -Douglas Adams 14"late 2003 ibook g4, 640 MB RAM, 90GB HD; 4GB iPod nano Last edited by philipt42 : Oct 30, 2009 at 07:05 PM. Reason: Repost! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
__________________
white 20" intel iMac; 17" uMBP; iPhone 3GS 32 GB Black (3.1.2 jailbroken and unlocked) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
I think i found the cause of it (Airport) and made a video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flT7U_kGpaM |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2008
|
I have a 21.5" and 27" affected by this
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
If you click on the video provided in the article, the guy posted a follow-up video showing how to fix it.
I find it ironic that he chose to show how to fix the problem while playing back one of those smug-ass "I'm a Mac" commercials where the woman talks about wanting a computer that "just works," while the guy watching the video on his "just working" computer has to turn off wireless and turn it back on just to get simple internet videos to play correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jan 2009
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| skate71290 |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by skate71290 |
|
|
#19 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida Resident
|
I hope the problem can be fixed. That would really be a huge disappointment for someone that is getting their first Mac.
[Update] Can Adobe send their programmers to training so they can write better Mac apps? |
|
|
|
| BornAgainMac |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by BornAgainMac |
|
|
#20 |
|
macrumors newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brea, CA
|
shouldn't the "spin down" issue be solved by installing the Performance Update 1.0 that was sent out prior to the refreshes?
__________________
13'' Unibody Macbook (Collector's Edition ), 2.0ghz, 2 GB RAM (trying to purchase 4GB from crucial, but waiting for prices to drop)iPhone 3GS 16GB White Forever
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2006
|
As if we needed another reason to ditch the crap technology that is Flash!
__________________
TimeTable: The Freelancer's Tool |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Pitcairn
|
Quote:
![]() I still use My pismo and flash is just not playable. Worse,most sites nowadays use CR*P Flash,just plain stupid
__________________
Powerbook G3 500 Pismo. Call Me old fashioned but its still the best ever made
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Flash
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
macrumors 6502a
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota, Florida
|
My Mac Pro is fine but on my old faithful iBook G4 Flash Click to Flash (CtF) is a life savor. The poor thing went from working fine last year to this year over heating and freezing when CNN or Time web sites were loaded. Now with CfF installed it is working fine again. It is interesting (correction horrifying) to see the sheer number of flash windows scattered all over the web pages when CtF is running, many invisible, many over things where you would normally click for a link. The web designers are totally over doing sneaky invisible flash windows. Try CtF, if only to see these damn invisible flash windows!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|