Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 23, 2009, 06:28 PM   #1
Lucagfc
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Difference in the daily use between core i5 and i7

Hi

I'm about to buy new 27" iMac. I am undecided between the two quad core models. There are big differences in the daily use between the two? worth spending more for the Core i7.

Thanks and sorry for my bad english
__________________
MacBook Pro 17" (Early 2011) iPhone 4 iPad 2 White
Lucagfc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2009, 07:07 PM   #2
C64
macrumors 6502a
 
C64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Hi,

There are a lot of topics about this already. But to sum it up: for daily use (i.e. mail, browsing, IM, music, photos, videos, etc.) the C2D will do just fine. Having a QC won't change the experience for these things that much, and the difference between the i5 and i7 is basically not noticeable.

You'll only see a difference when you're working with heavier applications, work with HD videos or really high resolution photos/canvasses in Photoshop, do heavy encoding work, etc. In that case you will definitely notice the QC power. But between the two it'll come down to doing something in e.g. 50 minutes with the i7 in stead of 60 minutes with the i5.

Graphs are nice, but in most cases you really won't notice the extra power. If you can afford it, want the best available at this time and ómaybeó gain some extra speed in the future when and if Hyper-threading actually starts making a difference: go for the i7.

The i5 is still the best bang for your buck though. Despite what graphs like these might suggest, it will handle everything you throw at just as good as the i7. It'll come down to those few more minutes with heavier tasks. All the other stuff you're doing the rest of the time: no (noticeable) difference. And you can use the $200 or so difference for more RAM or a bigger HD.



Edit: another thing to consider. Let's jump ahead a time a few years and everything is bigger, better and heavier. By the time you start to notice that the i5 just isn't cutting it anymore, the i7 will have the same problems. At that time having the i7 in stead of the i5 really won't make that much of a difference, and you'll be looking at whatever is next anyways.

Last edited by C64; Nov 23, 2009 at 07:22 PM.
C64 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2009, 07:16 PM   #3
MovieCutter
Banned
 
MovieCutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucagfc View Post
Hi
There are big differences in the daily use between the two?
Unless your daily use includes heavy transcoding....none
MovieCutter is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2009, 09:06 PM   #4
cmvsm
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
You probably won't see a big difference in the day to day stuff. However, whenever the iMacs are updated again, you can probably bet that the i7 will still be on the listing, and probably remain in the next update after that. The i5 won't make the next update, so you are already dating your investment over a measly $180 (educational).
cmvsm is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2009, 11:17 AM   #5
53x12
macrumors 68000
 
53x12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmvsm View Post
The i5 won't make the next update, so you are already dating your investment over a measly $180 (educational).
What does this mean that the i5 won't make the next update?
53x12 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2009, 11:36 AM   #6
lca355
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
That's a really good post C64. I'm kind of sitting on the fence between i5 and i7. nice to know i'm not missing out on that much if I go i5.
__________________
27" Imac 2.8GHZ Core I7 / 64gb 3G iPad / 64 gb Iphone 5
lca355 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 24, 2009, 11:51 AM   #7
SOLLERBOY
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Manchester,UK
Judging by the PC World benchmarks the i7 is only one second quicker unzipping a 2gb file and this minor boost is also represented elsewhere. It seems that in real world use it's a difference of seconds for small tasks and maybe 10 minutes for a large video encode.
__________________
27" iMac i7 3.4 3TBF 680MX Very Late 2012
17" MacBook Pro 2.2 i7 8GB 64GB Early 2011
16GB iPhone 5s Gold 32GB iPad Air
SOLLERBOY is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 06:28 AM   #8
Lucagfc
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
First of all thank you all for your valuable advice!

I am sure that there is NO great difference in performance between the two

I would like to keep the computer for about 2 years and perhaps i7 will be easier to sell when the times come

I want to order the computer today but I can not decide!!
__________________
MacBook Pro 17" (Early 2011) iPhone 4 iPad 2 White
Lucagfc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 08:26 AM   #9
Lucagfc
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
I've made my decision: I ordered an iMac 27" Core i7. I chose the i7 because this time I keep the computer for longer so I took the most CPU performance and will therefore be most durable and retains his price.

I hope that does not present any of the problems that I read on the forum

Thanks to everyone for the advice
__________________
MacBook Pro 17" (Early 2011) iPhone 4 iPad 2 White
Lucagfc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 10:58 AM   #10
cmvsm
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by 53x12 View Post
What does this mean that the i5 won't make the next update?
Maybe that's an exaggeration. The i5 might simply move to the low end position on the next update, with the i7 moving to the current i5 offering. The Core 2 Duos will most likely not be a choice I'd venture to say.
cmvsm is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 11:07 AM   #11
Jiten
macrumors 6502a
 
Jiten's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
I'm pretty sure that the i5 will probably trickle down to the mid to lower end in the next few iMac updates but not totally gone.
Jiten is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 11:36 AM   #12
Lucagfc
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
I think that i7 will reamin in Apple Lineup for more time the i5. In this casi, probably, when i want to sell it probably i7 is easier to sell. These are all guesses of course.

P.S. sorry for my english
__________________
MacBook Pro 17" (Early 2011) iPhone 4 iPad 2 White
Lucagfc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Nov 25, 2009, 12:37 PM   #13
eelpout
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
Quote:
Originally Posted by MovieCutter View Post
Unless your daily use includes heavy transcoding....none
yep and Apple makes a nice extra $100 off ya just on the pricing on the i7 CPU.

I did a search for hyperthreading advantages and Java recently because I use a photo app that uses a Java engine and was curious. Came up with this benchmark. Like the author says, "meh."

eelpout is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2009, 08:09 AM   #14
kjkoster
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Dear eelpout,

Please note that I did that benchmark on an old P4 box. I never claimed that this test carries over to the modern crop of hyperthreading processors. As I stated in the article: "Now all I need is someone to throw me a free Intel Nehalem machine to test the new crop of hyper-threaded processors. :-)"

Sooo.... can I borrow yours? :-)

Kees Jan
kjkoster is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual Core vs. Quad Core MBP speed difference? Marbles1 MacBook Pro 3 Apr 3, 2013 05:19 PM
Real world difference between dual-core 13" rMBP and my quad-core iMac PatriotInvasion MacBook Pro 8 Apr 1, 2013 02:00 PM
Speed difference: 12 core 2.93 vs 12 core 2.66 slater-k Mac Pro 19 Nov 30, 2012 06:47 PM
Performance difference between Dual core i7 in 2012 MBP 13 v/s Quad Core 2011 iMac i5 mjoshi123 MacBook Pro 3 Sep 14, 2012 02:11 PM
Will I noticed a difference if I upgrade from 2.93 4-core to 3.33 hex core? chiefroastbeef Mac Pro 8 Aug 21, 2012 10:01 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC