|Dec 16, 2009, 10:57 AM||#2|
The PowerMac is no longer supported by Apple on the software side - you might be able to get it to run a few years with PPC Linux, but that's up to you.
However, if you need massive amounts of RAM, disc throughput, and multiple monitors, the Quad may be right for you. On the other hand, a used 2006 MacPro should only be a couple-hundred dollars more, and if you were trying to buy an Apple tower, that may be the one to go for; As I said, for software the G5 is running out of time.
And if you can remember the "Megahertz Myth"? It was a good comparison for POWER versus Pentium 4. It came full circle when Intel released Core2, which gave several times the computational ability then POWER5 did at the time. To answer your question, for sheer computational ability, the iMac will be faster.
And if you're wondering, yes, I bought my G5 in April this year, and yes, I will be upgrading to a MacPro soon enough.
MacPro 4.1 | Powermac 11.2
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Buyer inquiry: My Quad vs. his 2.8 C2D 15" MBP||burnout8488||PowerPC Macs||3||Oct 17, 2011 12:27 PM|
|i7 MBP vs. iMac 2.4 C2D in video encoding||namethisfile||MacBook Pro||2||Dec 10, 2010 01:35 PM|
|Powermac g5 quad vs Intel iMac/ MacBook pro for audio production||Crugga||PowerPC Macs||23||Dec 1, 2010 10:54 PM|
|mac book pro 2.4 vs imac 2.4||jesusplay||Buying Tips and Advice||3||Jan 10, 2008 04:30 AM|
|G5 Quad vs. iMac c2d||Alari||PowerPC Macs||20||Apr 1, 2007 07:19 AM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.