Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:10 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
AirPort Express Reportedly Cracked

ZDNET Netherlands reports that the public key used by Apple's AirPort Express has been revealed by Norwegian hacker Jon Lech Johansen, famous for developing code to bypass DVD encryption and bring DVD playback to Linux. Johansen also released JustePort, a program for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux that reportedly allows third party software to stream music to an AirPort Express.

Last edited by Doctor Q : Aug 12, 2004 at 02:53 PM.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:12 PM   #2
MrSugar
macrumors 6502a
 
MrSugar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Send a message via ICQ to MrSugar Send a message via AIM to MrSugar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
ZDNET Netherlands reports that the public key used by Apple's AirPort Express has been revealed by Norwegian hacker Jon Lech Johansen, famous for developing code to bypass DVD encryption and bring DVD playback to Linux. Johansen also released JustePort, a program that reportedly allows third party software to stream music to an AirPort Express.
whoa.. that's pretty intense. Windows media player streaming to an AE.. ewww
__________________
Laptop: Macbook (Black) 2ghz 1gig
Desktop: dual 2ghz G5 - dual 23" acd's
Toys: 40gig iPod - iSight - airport express

-- Fluidvision Design
MrSugar is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:12 PM   #3
KevanDual2.5
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: East Lothian, Scotland.
Send a message via AIM to KevanDual2.5 Send a message via MSN to KevanDual2.5
Mind over Mind!

If a human mind is able to create the encryption then another human mind can crack it. I don't think there is any such thing as 100% crack-proof!
KevanDual2.5 is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:12 PM   #4
musicpyrite
macrumors 68000
 
musicpyrite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cape Cod
Yea, I saw this on slashdot.

I wonder how Apple will respond to this?
__________________
For SCIENCE!!
musicpyrite is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:13 PM   #5
friarbayliff
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: MN / IN
That's intersting. Someone was bound to do it eventually though.
__________________
12" 1.33GHz Powerbook G4, 8GB iPhone
friarbayliff is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:14 PM   #6
ZildjianKX
Guest
 
ZildjianKX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
One word... sweet.
ZildjianKX is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:17 PM   #7
D0ct0rteeth
macrumors 65816
 
D0ct0rteeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Franklin, TN
Send a message via AIM to D0ct0rteeth Send a message via MSN to D0ct0rteeth Send a message via Yahoo to D0ct0rteeth Send a message via Skype™ to D0ct0rteeth
Quote:
Originally Posted by musicpyrite
Yea, I saw this on slashdot.

I wonder how Apple will respond to this?
I doubt apple really cares.. they probably prefer that it is cracked in order to sell more units and broaden its appeal.

However for legal reasons and to please the whiney biach that is the RIAA I am sure they needed it to be secure and will re-secure it proptly thru a software/firmware update just as they did with the fiasco re: sharing iTunes libraries last year.

- Doc
__________________
http://twitter.com/c_johnson
D0ct0rteeth is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:17 PM   #8
NusuniAdmin
Guest
 
NusuniAdmin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevanDual2.5
If a human mind is able to create the encryption then another human mind can crack it. I don't think there is any such thing as 100% crack-proof!
what if a computer generated it? Computer AI that would be designed to make encryptions would be pretty extreme. I have not heard of this yet, but im sure it will be popping up pretty soon. Only thing is the AI would have to be made VERY well.
NusuniAdmin is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:38 PM   #9
kingtj
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Saint Louis. MO (USA)
Send a message via ICQ to kingtj
Good for him!

Why the heck are people rating this story "negative"? Is it so horrible to think a product you paid over $100 for could be given additional uses not on its original "compatibility list"?

All Apple has to (and IMHO really *should*) do about this is put some sort of disclaimer on the Airport Express boxes stating that applications other than the one below (list them all) are considered "unsupported products", and Apple does not guarantee their proper/reliable operation with this device.

Open source is what allowed Apple to build OS X to begin with. I think it's pretty "two-faced" of them to try to take legal measures to stop people from releasing open source that enables originally unintended uses of their products by their customers.
kingtj is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:42 PM   #10
LaMerVipere
macrumors 6502a
 
LaMerVipere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Send a message via AIM to LaMerVipere
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZildjianKX
One word... sweet.
I second that.
__________________
MacBook Pro + iPhone 3G
LaMerVipere is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:46 PM   #11
JoePike
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
the day is coming

And soon we will all be able to watch a DVD on our PowerBooks and pump that audio wirelessly to the home stereo system. Money!

-Joe
__________________
15" MBP 2.33 ghz Core 2 Duo; 20" iMac 2.0 ghz G5; PowerMac G4 MDD Dual 1.0 ghz; Original G4 Cube; 80 gb iPod Classic; 8 gb 1st Gen iPhone
JoePike is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:46 PM   #12
bob_the_gorilla
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derby, UK
Send a message via AIM to bob_the_gorilla
Well, I haven't rated it. I'm ambiguous.

Cool - I could use it to get sound from Halo wirelessly. One less wire coming out of my powerbook.

Not cool - the RIAA won't be happy with Apple, and they'll have to fix it. More bad feeling in the music industry isn't good for our rights.
bob_the_gorilla is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:48 PM   #13
dizastor
macrumors 6502a
 
dizastor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Los Angeles
This guy is amazing. I wish I had half the knowledge he does.
__________________
ejc on Twitter
dizastor is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:49 PM   #14
stcanard
macrumors 65816
 
stcanard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Okay, this bugged me about the slashdot headline too, being way to sensationalistic...

This is not "CRACKED" in any way. He has disassembled iTunes (probably) and retrieved the public key.

This allows people to write programs that will send to airport express, but the encryption itself is still completely safe.

Breaking this is as simple as Apple putting out a firmware update with new keys, and probably tweaking things a bit so the public key is harder to find next time.

Since the music itself isn't encrypted except when it's being streamed, there is not even a worry about maintaining backward compatibility (like there is with CSS or FairPlay). Apple software developers could do this in their sleep.
stcanard is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:49 PM   #15
ryanw
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by D0ct0rteeth
I doubt apple really cares.. they probably prefer that it is cracked in order to sell more units and broaden its appeal.

However for legal reasons and to please the whiney biach that is the RIAA I am sure they needed it to be secure and will re-secure it proptly thru a software/firmware update just as they did with the fiasco re: sharing iTunes libraries last year.

- Doc
Well, thats the thing. He hasn't really CRACKED the encryption, but more he's cracked AirTunes. So he can has figured out how to encrypt the traffic to talk to the Airport Express and have it play music. So this isn't really a leak or a deficiency in the encryption, but more a problem if apple doesn't want anyone to be able to use AirTunes except for iTunes. For all we know Apple might release an API to developers to use AirTunes into their applications and this might become a moot point.
ryanw is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:52 PM   #16
Blue Moon
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingtj
Why the heck are people rating this story "negative"? Is it so horrible to think a product you paid over $100 for could be given additional uses not on its original "compatibility list"?

All Apple has to (and IMHO really *should*) do about this is put some sort of disclaimer on the Airport Express boxes stating that applications other than the one below (list them all) are considered "unsupported products", and Apple does not guarantee their proper/reliable operation with this device.

Open source is what allowed Apple to build OS X to begin with. I think it's pretty "two-faced" of them to try to take legal measures to stop people from releasing open source that enables originally unintended uses of their products by their customers.
As another member already pointed out, Apple has very little choice (if they want to protect their asses from being attacked by the RIAA) other than to take legal action and to create a patch.
Blue Moon is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:53 PM   #17
mikeyrogers
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: El Paso, TX, USA
Send a message via AIM to mikeyrogers
I think this is good for two reasons:

1) Either we have an open ended audio device that allows us to use it how we intend to or
2) Apple will patch it like they do with most of their cracked products and in order to get people to download it, as an incentive, they will add a cool feature or two of their own.

With thought 2, that got me to thinking even more...Apple sure does get a lot of the hardware cracked...I wonder why.
mikeyrogers is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:54 PM   #18
Mord
macrumors 601
 
Mord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: People's Republic of Yorkshire
Send a message via AIM to Mord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
Johansen also released JustePort, a program for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux that reportedly allows third party software to stream music to an AirPort Express.
good to hear
__________________
Consider the lily.
Mord is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:55 PM   #19
ryanw
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Moon
As another member already pointed out, Apple has very little choice (if they want to protect their asses from being attacked by the RIAA) other than to take legal action and to create a patch.
As I stated in my other post, this has nothing to do with RIAA. The stream is still safely encrypted and has no way of being intercepted. This software lets you stream music ENCRYPTED to the Airport Express through other means than iTunes.
ryanw is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 02:59 PM   #20
lou tsee
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: switzerland
Unhappy

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoePike
And soon we will all be able to watch a DVD on our PowerBooks and pump that audio wirelessly to the home stereo system. Money!

-Joe
I'm afraid, you won't be able to do so. streaming audio in this way
causes a latency (delay) of around 1 second. so your movie soundtrack
will be out of sync badly

I had the same idea i the first place though....
__________________
G5 dual 2GHz 2.5G RAM
TiBook800- wearing off slowly
iPod 5G Rev.A
lou tsee is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 03:00 PM   #21
Spaceman Spiff
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by NusuniAdmin
what if a computer generated it? Computer AI that would be designed to make encryptions would be pretty extreme.
Ah, yes, but this computer would have to be made by a human first. Which would bring it limitations again.
Spaceman Spiff is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 03:00 PM   #22
bathysphere
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blue Moon
As another member already pointed out, Apple has very little choice (if they want to protect their asses from being attacked by the RIAA) other than to take legal action and to create a patch.
i don't really understand why the riaa would have a problem with this. anyone care to fill me in? because i just don't see it.
bathysphere is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 03:03 PM   #23
stcanard
macrumors 65816
 
stcanard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vancouver
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob_the_gorilla
Not cool - the RIAA won't be happy with Apple, and they'll have to fix it. More bad feeling in the music industry isn't good for our rights.
If anything, it should be the opposite:

1) The content that can be played now is the same as the content that can be played before. Just that there are more options in the programs.

2) The stream is still as safe as it ever was.

3)Safer, actually now that we know Apple is using a trusted encryption method instead of creating their own.

Apple knew this was coming. You cannot hand people both ends of the encryption process and expect that they aren't going to be able to figure it out. That's the fundamental issue with encryption based DRM -- the necessary information for defeating it by definition has to be build into the player.
stcanard is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 03:08 PM   #24
supertex
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Louisiana State University
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyrogers
With thought 2, that got me to thinking even more...Apple sure does get a lot of the hardware cracked...I wonder why.
The PC world gets just as much stuff cracked, if not more, it's just that nobody is surprised when Microsoft security breaks down, lol (not that this is technically a break in security...)
__________________
Remember The Alamo!!!!
supertex is offline  
Old Aug 12, 2004, 03:12 PM   #25
ryanw
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by lou tsee
I'm afraid, you won't be able to do so. streaming audio in this way
causes a latency (delay) of around 1 second. so your movie soundtrack
will be out of sync badly

I had the same idea i the first place though....
Sure, but you could maybe integrate it into the DVD player to offset the video by 500ms or 1000ms or whatever to compensate for this issue. Make it even a user defined offset with a slider or something...
ryanw is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC