|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
What's faster 9800XT or X800 for PC?
Hey I know this isn't PC forum but that could help me out.
So what do you think. 9800XT slower than regular X800 (NOT X800XT)? And if so, by how much?
__________________
I will inject myself into your veins. -------------------------------------- The Matrix Online. The Beta testing has begun. Join us, Red Pill. For more info: The Matrix Online |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
Quote:
The X800 base is supposedly 3X as fast as the Rad9800... The Rad9800XT is only clocked 40-50 mhz faster than the regular 9800, but it's still much slower than the X800.
__________________
My Apple History: Apple IIc; Powerbook 145; Powerbook Duo 280C; Performa 6400/200; Wallstreet Powerbook G3 266; Dual USB iBook G3 500 Currently Using: Powerbook G4 Rev B 1Ghz 512MB; PowerMac G5 SP 1.8Ghz 1GB Radeon9800 Pro SE 256 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida, USA
|
X800 600... or whatever (non-XT version) is supposedly 50% faster than 9800XT. The 9800XT is 40% faster than the 9800 Pro in some cases because the clock speed is dynamically changed (read overclocked) depending on the demands of the computer.
__________________
MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz 4GB DDR3 RAM 32GB iPod Touch |
|
|
| crazzyeddie |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by crazzyeddie |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|