Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 14, 2010, 01:08 PM   #1
ManhattanPrjct
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Polarizers - Slim vs Regular

I'm going to get a polarizing filter as my first filter and am not sure if I "need" a slim filter. I have a 77mm normal lens but also have a 72mm UWA. I understand slim filters can cut down on vignetting at wider angles, but that if I'm shooting with a 11-16 lens (vs my 17-50), the effect of the filter won't be uniform at such a wide focal length.

I will probably get a B+W Kaeseman MRC, and the price difference at B&H isn't extraordinary ($3).

I guess the only other thing I can think of is that I wouldn't be able to stack filters onto a slim filter, but I am not sure if I would see myself needing to do that anyway.

Any thoughts?
ManhattanPrjct is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2010, 02:27 PM   #2
agtoau
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManhattanPrjct View Post
I'm going to get a polarizing filter as my first filter and am not sure if I "need" a slim filter. I have a 77mm normal lens but also have a 72mm UWA. I understand slim filters can cut down on vignetting at wider angles, but that if I'm shooting with a 11-16 lens (vs my 17-50), the effect of the filter won't be uniform at such a wide focal length.

I will probably get a B+W Kaeseman MRC, and the price difference at B&H isn't extraordinary ($3).

I guess the only other thing I can think of is that I wouldn't be able to stack filters onto a slim filter, but I am not sure if I would see myself needing to do that anyway.

Any thoughts?
Get the B+W UV filters in the F-Pro thin mount. These are the best because they also have front threads so that your clip-on lens cap will snap on (otherwise you will be dealing with push-on lens caps which keep falling out). You will find these filters at 2filter.com.
agtoau is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2010, 03:14 PM   #3
ManhattanPrjct
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by agtoau View Post
Get the B+W UV filters in the F-Pro thin mount. These are the best because they also have front threads so that your clip-on lens cap will snap on (otherwise you will be dealing with push-on lens caps which keep falling out). You will find these filters at 2filter.com.
Not interested in a UV filter, but thanks.
ManhattanPrjct is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2010, 06:02 PM   #4
Ruahrc
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Don't get the B+W slim ones, at least the ones with push-on caps. I have known 2 people both who bought the slim B+W polarizer, and both had trouble with the push on cap constantly falling off. If they make a slightly thicker version with a little front thread for lens caps, I'd get that.

Whether or not a slim one is actually necessary really depends on the lens. Look for info online from users of the lens you have, and see if they have vignetting problems with a normal thickness filter. My Nikkor 12-24, for example, uses 77mm filters but it does not have vignetting problems at 12mm even with a normal filter. However, I think some of the alternatives like the Tokina 12-24, you needed to use a slim polarizer in order to avoid vignetting at 12mm. So you see it's not really a focal length + lens diameter issue, more of a case-by-case basis.

Otherwise maybe you can try some alternative brands, for example you can buy high end Hoyas or Tiffens that are good quality, and may be better with regards to slim profile + lens caps.
Ruahrc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2010, 06:29 PM   #5
ManhattanPrjct
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruahrc View Post
Don't get the B+W slim ones, at least the ones with push-on caps. I have known 2 people both who bought the slim B+W polarizer, and both had trouble with the push on cap constantly falling off. If they make a slightly thicker version with a little front thread for lens caps, I'd get that.
That's the chief complaint about slim filters, but for an 11-16, they are apparently a "must."

I have been researching the effects of using a 72->77mm step-up ring for when I mount my Tamron 17-50, but I can't imagine it could have a great negative impact.
ManhattanPrjct is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2010, 08:29 PM   #6
John.B
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flyover Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManhattanPrjct View Post
That's the chief complaint about slim filters, but for an 11-16, they are apparently a "must."

I have been researching the effects of using a 72->77mm step-up ring for when I mount my Tamron 17-50, but I can't imagine it could have a great negative impact.
I tried a step up ring briefly, but they prevent you from making good use of your lens hoods.
__________________
Google Maps for iOS: "Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited."
John.B is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2010, 09:16 PM   #7
compuwar
macrumors 601
 
compuwar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManhattanPrjct View Post
I'm going to get a polarizing filter as my first filter and am not sure if I "need" a slim filter. I have a 77mm normal lens but also have a 72mm UWA. I understand slim filters can cut down on vignetting at wider angles, but that if I'm shooting with a 11-16 lens (vs my 17-50), the effect of the filter won't be uniform at such a wide focal length.

I will probably get a B+W Kaeseman MRC, and the price difference at B&H isn't extraordinary ($3).

I guess the only other thing I can think of is that I wouldn't be able to stack filters onto a slim filter, but I am not sure if I would see myself needing to do that anyway.

Any thoughts?
The slim will vignette less- if you need it 2% of the time, it'll be worth it. If you need to cap it, use one of the sock-like caps and don't sweat it.

Paul
__________________
PaulDRobertson.net Have I been helpful? How about a print for your wall? US, UK and CA fine art sales!
compuwar is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2010, 02:10 AM   #8
The Mad Kiwi
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In Hell
Don't bother with the slim version you can't use a ultra wide lens with a polariser. Just get a normal one so you can clip your cap on easily.

Well technically you can use a polariser on an ultra wide as the filter will fit the lens, but the sky ends up 1/2 polarised and 1/2 not, so it looks crap.
The Mad Kiwi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2010, 09:29 AM   #9
Ruahrc
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mad Kiwi View Post
Well technically you can use a polariser on an ultra wide as the filter will fit the lens, but the sky ends up 1/2 polarised and 1/2 not, so it looks crap.
If you're filling the frame at 12mm with a cloudless sky, then I totally agree. However, there are many other situations where a polarizer is both useful and usable on an UWA lens. If you shoot in portrait format, for example, the viewing coverage is not as great. You don't need to always turn the polarizer for maximum darkening of the sky, there can be clouds/trees in the sky which break up the sky and makes the polarization effect less obvious, etc.

Don't forget that a polarizer can be used to go beyond darkening skies as well. It is very useful to cut out glare on foliage or water, compositions that may not necessarily include the sky and are often taken with UWA lenses.

Ruahrc
Ruahrc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 16, 2010, 09:54 AM   #10
ManhattanPrjct
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Thanks for the responses - B+W Slim MRC and step-up ring are in the mail.
ManhattanPrjct is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Yoobao Slim vs. Power Support Folio DaneGuy iPad Accessories 23 Oct 2, 2010 06:59 PM
VMWare Fusion - Subscription vs. Regular Upgrade? netdog Windows, Linux & others on the Mac 1 Jan 4, 2010 07:27 AM
Studio Monitors vs. Regular speakers peterhaunted604 Digital Audio 22 Sep 1, 2006 02:51 PM
SATA vs. regular ATA DrRock Buying Tips and Advice 26 May 6, 2006 08:41 PM
External Monitor for Powerbook: widescreen vs regular? Argelius PowerPC Macs 4 Jun 29, 2005 09:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC