|
|
#1 |
|
Polarizers - Slim vs Regular
I'm going to get a polarizing filter as my first filter and am not sure if I "need" a slim filter. I have a 77mm normal lens but also have a 72mm UWA. I understand slim filters can cut down on vignetting at wider angles, but that if I'm shooting with a 11-16 lens (vs my 17-50), the effect of the filter won't be uniform at such a wide focal length.
I will probably get a B+W Kaeseman MRC, and the price difference at B&H isn't extraordinary ($3). I guess the only other thing I can think of is that I wouldn't be able to stack filters onto a slim filter, but I am not sure if I would see myself needing to do that anyway. Any thoughts? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Don't get the B+W slim ones, at least the ones with push-on caps. I have known 2 people both who bought the slim B+W polarizer, and both had trouble with the push on cap constantly falling off. If they make a slightly thicker version with a little front thread for lens caps, I'd get that.
Whether or not a slim one is actually necessary really depends on the lens. Look for info online from users of the lens you have, and see if they have vignetting problems with a normal thickness filter. My Nikkor 12-24, for example, uses 77mm filters but it does not have vignetting problems at 12mm even with a normal filter. However, I think some of the alternatives like the Tokina 12-24, you needed to use a slim polarizer in order to avoid vignetting at 12mm. So you see it's not really a focal length + lens diameter issue, more of a case-by-case basis. Otherwise maybe you can try some alternative brands, for example you can buy high end Hoyas or Tiffens that are good quality, and may be better with regards to slim profile + lens caps. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
I have been researching the effects of using a 72->77mm step-up ring for when I mount my Tamron 17-50, but I can't imagine it could have a great negative impact. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I tried a step up ring briefly, but they prevent you from making good use of your lens hoods.
__________________
Google Maps for iOS: "Directions may be inaccurate, incomplete, dangerous, or prohibited." |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
Paul
__________________
PaulDRobertson.net Have I been helpful? How about a print for your wall? US, UK and CA fine art sales! |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Don't bother with the slim version you can't use a ultra wide lens with a polariser. Just get a normal one so you can clip your cap on easily.
Well technically you can use a polariser on an ultra wide as the filter will fit the lens, but the sky ends up 1/2 polarised and 1/2 not, so it looks crap. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
Don't forget that a polarizer can be used to go beyond darkening skies as well. It is very useful to cut out glare on foliage or water, compositions that may not necessarily include the sky and are often taken with UWA lenses. Ruahrc |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Thanks for the responses - B+W Slim MRC and step-up ring are in the mail.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Yoobao Slim vs. Power Support Folio | DaneGuy | iPad Accessories | 23 | Oct 2, 2010 06:59 PM |
| VMWare Fusion - Subscription vs. Regular Upgrade? | netdog | Windows, Linux & others on the Mac | 1 | Jan 4, 2010 07:27 AM |
| Studio Monitors vs. Regular speakers | peterhaunted604 | Digital Audio | 22 | Sep 1, 2006 02:51 PM |
| SATA vs. regular ATA | DrRock | Buying Tips and Advice | 26 | May 6, 2006 08:41 PM |
| External Monitor for Powerbook: widescreen vs regular? | Argelius | PowerPC Macs | 4 | Jun 29, 2005 09:35 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:29 PM.







Linear Mode

