Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
320M vs 9600M GT
- Thread starter Kingcodez
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Appears to be a little faster -- not much. Basically, it has more cores, so it seems to come out around 50% faster. It's otherwise basically the same hardware, and likewise, basically the same as the 8600M GT, only faster. The 9600M GT was just a better-clocked 8600M on smaller process, the 330M is roughly the same hardware with 50% more shaders. That's it.
Thread: Comparison between 320M and 9600M GT - please weigh in. This is interesting for some folks.
The difference between the 330m and 9600m is larger than the difference between the 9600m and the 320m.
The 330m is alot better than the 9600m btw. The 330m performs around 50% faster than the 9600m GT.
3DMARK05 scores
330m: 12664
GT9600m: 9592
320m (integrated): 7168
Crysis ( high ):
330m: 20 fps
9600m: 13 fps
320m (integrated): 11 fps
Crysis ( low ):
330m: 78 fos
9600m: 59 fps
320m (integrated): 40 fps
WoW (high)
330m: 42 fps
9600m: 20 fps
320m (integrated): 23 fps
Last edited:
The difference between the 330m and 9600m is larger than the difference between the 9600m and the 320m.
The 330m is alot better than the 9600m btw. The 330m performs around 50% faster than the 9600m GT.
3DMARK05 scores
330m: 12664
GT9600m: 9592
320m (integrated): 7168
Crysis ( high ):
330m: 20 fps
9600m: 13 fps
320m (integrated): 11 fps
Crysis ( low ):
330m: 78 fos
9600m: 59 fps
320m (integrated): 40 fps
WoW (high)
330m: 42 fps
9600m: 20 fps
320m (integrated): 23 fps
Wow... I feel kind of jipped that I bought the 15 inch 2.53ghz 2008 uMBP even though it was as a Refurb. Feels like I would have gotten a better machine out of the 13 inch MBP... and more compact too... and I would have gotten an SD card reader.
Thanks for contributing in such a meaningful way.
Like your contribution was meaningful?