|
|
| Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate. |
|
|||||||
| TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DELETE THIS ACCOUNT
|
Well boys and girls what you are about to read is what I think the next 'MAJOR' bump to the PowerMac will be powered by.... And it AIN'T a MOT CPU!!!
"IBM is disclosing the technical details of a new 64-bit PowerPC microprocessor designed for desktops and entry-level servers. Based on the award winning Power4 design, this processor is an 8-way superscalar design that fully supports Symmetric MultiProcessing. The processor is further enhanced by a vector processing unit implementing over 160 specialized vector instructions and implements a system interface capable of up to 6.4GB/s." And before anyone asks... In articles where Altivec has been written about they also state phrase 'over 160 specialized vector instructions' so even if IBM can't or ain't calling it Altivec it sure as heck 'sounds' pretty dern close. Link: http://www.mdronline.com/mpf/conf.html EDIT.. Oh and HyperTransport just happens to be/support 6.4 GB/s. Dave |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlantic City area
|
interesting
Sounds good so far...
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlantic City area
|
too bad
Too bad that conference is in October...it would rule out a G5 in August.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Demi-God (Moderator)
|
Disclosing new technical details? This won't be ready anytime soon - at least not something to get excited about yet. Its all *futuretech*, and its not happening till October. Nice specs though - love to have one now.
D
__________________
"Klaatu varada nikto!"
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ha ha haaa!
|
Well, based upon Apple's current rollout of "new" technologies, we should be seeing this in no LESS than a year... sounds promising but I'm certainly not expecting to see it any time soon.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: DELETE THIS ACCOUNT
|
Quote:
(the G4 is 4 way superscalar)Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
30th post...
I would love to see such a thing. It would be AMAZING if Apple could beat the PC makers to the puch and offer HyperTransport before they did. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe that HyperTransport has been adopted yet in the PC world (haven't seen mobos supporting it, not card, etc.) Too bad it probably won't happen...
__________________
17" MacBook Pro 2.6GHz Hi-Res iPhone 3GS 32GB Black |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, OR
|
We have no idea how long IBM has been working on this. It could be close, which goes along with some information that came with those deleted pictures. It is said to be "next generation G5 ready." If so, Steve anounces the new PowerMac line up with G4s now, and introduces the soon to be released G5. Then Apple will really have the power to run very high end video applications. No? It could also go into a 2U or 3U rackmount, as the anouncement said "for desktops and entry level servers." I hope we won't be disapointed.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
macrumors 68000
|
It all makes some sense now. I think the statement that the Canadian Motorola made about Moto stopping development on the PPC for the desktop market is true. Apple has probably been working with IBM for some time now in this processor. I would make a bet...and a pretty sure one at that...IBM will take over the PowerPC for Apple in the future...you can count out AMD and Intel...this is the way Apple will go....mark my word on this.
__________________
Mac: 20" Aluminum iMac Core 2 Duo 2.4 Ghz, Mac OSX 10.6.1 iPod Touch 32 GB iPod Classic 80GB Silver Motorola Droid A855 Last edited by Abercrombieboy : Aug 8, 2002 at 01:44 AM. |
|
|
| Abercrombieboy |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by Abercrombieboy |
|
|
#10 |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Motorola = Semi conductor company
Motorolla = German moped parts store
__________________
But then again, whereas Apple is being run by a brilliant marketer with the uncanny ability to bend people to his will, Gateway is being run by a man perfectly willing to go on television and show the world that he solicits business advice from a talking cow... |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
sweet
Well a few weeks ago, there was a rumor posted on MOSR claiming that the G5s to be introduced next year are to be Power4 based. This new development certainly adds more fuel to that fire.
an older thread on this topic We know IBM's desktop hardware presence is small (if any at all) so this new desktop-targeted PPC chip can't be for themselves. And if it's PPC-based, it's probably not for the x86 crowd. Who does that leave? Linux? Nah, it's gotta be Macs. -new Mac cases with a radically redesigned cooling system... -IBM opening a new state-of-the-art manufacturing plant... -And now this... the pieces are falling into place... |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Middle Earth
|
Foundry
IBM's not building it to sit idle. This proc sounds very interesting. I thing the possibilities are definitly there.
|
|
|
| nuckinfutz |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by nuckinfutz |
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: All up in your bidness
|
A lot of people are saying "PPC is dying! Apple needs to switch x86 pronto!" This article is only further proof that PowerPC is a strong architecture that will be around for a long time, even if it's not very strong in its G4 iteration. Can we kill the x86 rumors now... please?
One thing about IBM is that they don't drag their asses like Motorola. When they announce a chip, there it comes. Articles like this make me question the sanity of those who think Apple should port to x86 - most computer companies would KILL to have IBM AND Motorola peeling their grapes. Alex |
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: on the sofa
|
Power 4 sounds good...
I hope this comes to the Mac soon. My problem is that I need to upgrade from my G4/400 AGP a.s.a.p. and I'm waiting for the next PowerMac announcement before making a decision what to do.
Trouble is a 1Ghz upgrade card is £700 and a new base model of whatever is launched should be around £1300. So I think I have to buy whatever Apple launches, as the upgrade card seems a false economy even though the thought of having another G4 for a few years doesn't fill me with joy. If this IBM processor is true, it would be really nice to get a hint as to when it will come to market. I don't want to stick with the G4/400 any longer than I have to but if IBM powered Macs were to come in January I'd be really peeved if I buy a G4 this month. Oh God, the termoil. P.S. Can anyone help with my first ever post in the 'General Mac Discussion' forum about updating a Mk1 iBook... Thanks.
__________________
An Apple is for life, not just for an Expo "Drink till you reboot" - Bender |
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
macrumors 65816
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Re: too bad
Quote:
If Apple and IBM have secured the '160 Vector instructions' from Motorola, and black op'ed this chip in secret (we all know Apple loves secrets), IBM may relaize there is value in letting Apple get the press for consumer and IT sales, and wow industry purchasers in October. Or, it could just be an announcement of a new chip for us to wait for...
__________________
But then again, whereas Apple is being run by a brilliant marketer with the uncanny ability to bend people to his will, Gateway is being run by a man perfectly willing to go on television and show the world that he solicits business advice from a talking cow... |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
macrumors regular
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brooklyn, NYC
|
sounds promising. i'll bet my left nut that Apple goes IBM and ditches MOTO. And BTW, Moto does not own the actual technology of a vector proc unit. they own the name "AltiVec" and their exact instruction of it. that doesn't mean the rest of the world are not free to build similar, bigger, or better VPUs. this is worth waiting for.
__________________
"The spice must flow..." |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
macrumors member
Join Date: Jul 2002
|
This processor was announced last October. I doubt IBM has been sitting around playing solitare since then. Even if it doesn't make it into this next round of Macs (and I think it will), my guess is it will be out in less than 12 months.
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
macrumors 68000
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
macrumors member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| whiskeybravo |
| View Public Profile |
| Find More Posts by whiskeybravo |
|
|
#21 |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
It may be one reason why os9 is due to be abandoned this fall.
__________________
whatever |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
macrumors 6502a
|
not really sneed, its PPC compatible, no reason why it cant boot into OS0.
Nvidia Nforce mobos do have hypertransport, so does XBox. w00t for apple, IBM all the way!
__________________
Core i7 4.0ghz based PC. iMac 1.83ghz Core Duo 17" 1G iPhone 4gb, Palm Pre Check out my Garageband tunes here |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
macrumors regular
|
I see something ...
Hmm looks good I think ...
6,4 GB /troughput the same size as the Nforce2 can manage interesting ! ![]() We see a G5(or new chip) and a Nforce2 ? |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
macrumors regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
__________________
whatever |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
macrumors 68030
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Santa Cruz Ca
|
Since it's clear that the p58 chassis rumoured to be replacing the current Quicksilvers is still basically the same frame and structure it's quite possible Junkyard is a part-out option for present B&W G3 and G4 tower owners.
Wouldn't that be a kick in the ass? Take in that old pre-sawtooth G4 and have it's guts, panels and power supply swapped out for a G5 w/Hypertransport and DDR333. ( HUGE EVIL GRIN)
__________________
Power attracts pathological personalities. It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible. -Frank Herbert |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|