Hi all,
I will replace my mid 2007 15'' MBP with a High-Res 15'' i5 MBP in a few weeks and I am wondering whether there is any reason to chose the "mid" model (i.e. 2.53GHz i5, 500 GB HD).
The machine is used primarily to crunch Canon 5D2 RAW files (LR/CS4) and the usual web, music, video stuff. A SSD is out of question (for now) since I occasionally need to unload a whole set of 16GB CF cards straight to the internal HD (although RAW files are later moved to external storage units) so I need the 500 GB internal.
My plan is to either go for the 2.4GHz/i5 and swap the HD out myself (over here in Europe Apple charges enough for the upgrade so that I can buy a 500 GB drive myself and keep the 320 GB in an external enclosure) or go straight for the 2.53GHz/i5, however, the additional CPU speed seems to be minuscule.
Any reasons to still chose the "mid" option? Are there any reviews out comparing the two machines?
Cheers,
Dembo
I will replace my mid 2007 15'' MBP with a High-Res 15'' i5 MBP in a few weeks and I am wondering whether there is any reason to chose the "mid" model (i.e. 2.53GHz i5, 500 GB HD).
The machine is used primarily to crunch Canon 5D2 RAW files (LR/CS4) and the usual web, music, video stuff. A SSD is out of question (for now) since I occasionally need to unload a whole set of 16GB CF cards straight to the internal HD (although RAW files are later moved to external storage units) so I need the 500 GB internal.
My plan is to either go for the 2.4GHz/i5 and swap the HD out myself (over here in Europe Apple charges enough for the upgrade so that I can buy a 500 GB drive myself and keep the 320 GB in an external enclosure) or go straight for the 2.53GHz/i5, however, the additional CPU speed seems to be minuscule.
Any reasons to still chose the "mid" option? Are there any reviews out comparing the two machines?
Cheers,
Dembo