Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 8, 2004, 07:30 AM   #1
will
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Thumbs up IBM introduce faster 2.2GHz PowerPC 970FX in blades

"Initial JS20 servers used a 1.6GHz PowerPC 970, but the new models use a 2.2GHz PowerPC 970FX..."

http://news.com.com/IBM+brings+Unix%...3-5402114.html

Hopefully this means IBM are successfully ramping up production of faster 970s. Perhaps that rumoured XServe update will appear soon?
will is offline   0
Old Oct 8, 2004, 10:35 AM   #2
varmit
macrumors 68000
 
varmit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by will
"Initial JS20 servers used a 1.6GHz PowerPC 970, but the new models use a 2.2GHz PowerPC 970FX..."

http://news.com.com/IBM+brings+Unix%...3-5402114.html

Hopefully this means IBM are successfully ramping up production of faster 970s. Perhaps that rumoured XServe update will appear soon?
Um, you know the Big Mac cluster at VT is using 2.3Ghz Xservers right. Even though Apple only sells 2.0. And a speed boost in IBMs computers doesn't mean Apples will get them. But so you know, it is getting around that time for the Xservers to get a speed boost, most likely 2.5 if they figured out how to water cool in the Xserve, otherwise its probably be 2.3.

Last edited by varmit; Oct 8, 2004 at 10:39 AM.
varmit is offline   0
Old Oct 9, 2004, 08:33 AM   #3
will
Thread Starter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by varmit
Um, you know the Big Mac cluster at VT is using 2.3Ghz Xservers right. Even though Apple only sells 2.0.
Yes, I am aware of that rumour.

Quote:
Originally Posted by varmit
And a speed boost in IBMs computers doesn't mean Apples will get them.
That is of course true, but IBM is pretty conservative about introducing new tech for its servers, so it suggests they are reliably producing quanitites of 2.2GHz parts. Which is a hopeful sign.

Quote:
Originally Posted by varmit
But so you know, it is getting around that time for the Xservers to get a speed boost, most likely 2.5 if they figured out how to water cool in the Xserve, otherwise its probably be 2.3.
Unless the water cooling has proven reliability in the field (PowerMacs with it have only been with users a short time), I think Apple should stick with more conventional cooling. Reliability is of paramount importance in servers.
will is offline   0

 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can you buy new samsung ssd blades? tmanto02 MacBook Pro 12 Aug 25, 2013 02:20 PM
If Apple stayed with IBM PowerPC 76ShovelHead PowerPC Macs 48 Jan 7, 2013 04:33 AM
Why Blades? Kirkle iMac 4 Dec 16, 2012 09:47 PM
USB 3.0 enclosure for Apple SSD chips/blades kierennyc MacBook Air 4 Aug 11, 2012 02:18 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:45 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC