Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

craigdawg

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Hahaha!

The television had just exceeded its warranty, according to Bamberger.

Van Rossman was instructed to cease emitting a false distress signal--to stop watching TV--or face a fine by the Federal Communications Commission of $10,000 per day.

Isn't that always the case? Warranty ends and the machine starts acting up or dying.....

So it might mean he's going to have to pay for a fix or a new tv...or pay $10k

The nice thing is that its good to know the system works 😀

D
 
That $10,000 per day thing seems a little steep for the individual, its not like he's purposely causing it. Shouldn't the manufacturer be responsible for this?
 
If it wasn't working correctly, could it be considered a false distress signal? The t.v. was apparently in distress.

EDTV = Emergency Dysfunction Tele Vision
 
crazzyeddie said:
That $10,000 per day thing seems a little steep for the individual, its not like he's purposely causing it. Shouldn't the manufacturer be responsible for this?

I am assuming that it doesnt matter if its an individual or a company, the fines are the same. Just odd how a TV would tranmitt something, Even more odd that it can transmitt with enough for someone to pick it up from a distance. Maybe theres something with that TV that is not known....
 
I thought there are very strick FCC regs that prevent a device like a TV desined to receive signals to not broadcast one.

And what the hell is a TV doing programmed with an SOS signal?!? I cannot imagine much of a us for a TV to do that - now a cel-phone...

This is just odd...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.