Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacBytes.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 11, 2004, 02:16 AM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Log in, rock on


Category: Reviews
Link: Log in, rock on
Posted on MacBytes.com

Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2004, 07:27 AM   #2
ntg
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK - Rushden, Northants
Send a message via MSN to ntg
Seems to be a fairly balanced review, which also points out the pitfalls of trying to circumvent ITMS by using Harmony, something Real forgets to mention when plugging Harmony.

Nig.
__________________
"Life without Walls"? - so no need for Windows!!
Life is a sexually-transmitted terminal illness with interesting side-effects!!
ntg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2004, 08:02 AM   #3
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
Not to mention the BIGGEST reason not to use Real: iTunes happens to be a pretty good jukebox!
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2004, 10:45 AM   #4
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
He forgets that iTMS was not the first music download site. Napster and a few others came before it. iTMS was simply(?!) the first store that people cared enough about to actually buy from in significant numbers.

As for Real, the biggest reason to avoid them is that even if Apple doesn't break the Harmony system, Harmony breaks the convenience that makes an iPod worth owning. Once you use Harmony to load songs into an iPod, you can never again use iTunes to automatically sync-up your playlists - if you do, all the Harmony songs get purged from the iPod.

(Nevermind the fact that Real is run by a gang of hypocrites. They reverse engineer the Apple file formats and insist that it's perfectly OK, but they sue people who reverse engineer the Real file formats. This is what I'd expect from a crooked law-firm or a gangster, not a software company.)
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2004, 10:47 AM   #5
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by nagromme
Not to mention the BIGGEST reason not to use Real: iTunes happens to be a pretty good jukebox!
There's a reason I use it on my Mac and Windows PC's even though I don't own an iPod and have not bought anything from iTMS. iTunes isn't perfect, but it's far better than anything else right now. (WinAmp used to be good, but it became slow and bloated when version 3 shipped.)
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 11, 2004, 11:17 AM   #6
exopuppy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
get the facts straight

My favorite part of the article is where the writer insinuates that iTunes is only available for Mac because of its overwhelming popularity. . . methinks it should be the other way around? It only reached Winblows because it's the best software in its class and wanted to reach the largest user base.
exopuppy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 12, 2004, 11:37 AM   #7
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by exopuppy
My favorite part of the article is where the writer insinuates that iTunes is only available for Mac because of its overwhelming popularity. . . methinks it should be the other way around? It only reached Winblows because it's the best software in its class and wanted to reach the largest user base.
iTunes was probably ported to Windows because Windows users needed a way to access the music store. It was easier to port iTunes than to find a way to retrofit the store into MusicMatch (the previous way of loading iPods from Windows.) Especially since MusicMatch has their own (WMA-based) music store.

I doubt "because it's really good" was a major factor. If Apple was making porting decisions based on that, we'd have seen the rest of iLife ported over as well.
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 15, 2004, 02:17 AM   #8
solvs
macrumors 601
 
solvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LaLaLand, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamino
He forgets that iTMS was not the first music download site. Napster and a few others came before it.
Well iTunes wasn't the first legal d/l service, but Napster didn't turn legal until awhile later. That's true about nobody caring though. A lot of the early legal sites did suck, especially the ones where you had to have a subscription. Or where they only sold indie stuff, which is ok, but sometimes you want some mainstream stuff. Back when iTMS was just a rumor, Gateway came out with a similar product. Needless to say, it has not been very successful.
__________________
True love never dies
The only thing more dangerous than a woman scorned, is a man with nothing left to lose...
solvs is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC