Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 27, 2010, 11:23 AM   #1
tayloralmond
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan, USA
No Magic Trackpad for PPC?

Not that I'm that determined to buy a Magic Trackpad, but it still irritates me that Apple has left all PPC computers out in the cold on this new device.

"...compatible with Macintosh computers running Mac OS X Snow Leopard versions 10.6.4 and higher..."

I don't think it would take much effort for them to write drivers for Leopard on this one. The Magic Mouse is 10.5 compatible, so why not the Magic Trackpad? I really hope someone finds a way around this.
__________________
PowerMac G5: 2.0GHz DP, 4GB RAM; PowerMac G4: 1.5GHz DP (oc'd); iMac G5: 2.0GHz; iBook G3 14": 900MHz;
iMac G3: 600MHz; iBook G3 Clamshell: 466MHz
tayloralmond is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 12:10 PM   #2
76ShovelHead
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Connecticut
In every way possible they're trying to push us PPC users to Upgrade.
__________________
Haswell i5 3 GHz 8 GB Ram 128 GB SSD Mavericks
76ShovelHead is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 01:20 PM   #3
lewis82
macrumors 68000
 
lewis82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Totalitarian Republic of Northlandia
PPC is dead, guys. Just like they stopped supporting 6800 processors long long ago.

I'm not saying that they are bad computers. But the most recent is what... 5 years old? It's an eternity in computing.
__________________
Master Procrastinator. If you see me posting, I should be doing homework.
Downvoting is for sissies.
lewis82 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 01:24 PM   #4
flopticalcube
macrumors G4
 
flopticalcube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: In the velcro closure of America's Hat
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewis82 View Post
PPC is dead, guys. Just like they stopped supporting 6800 processors long long ago.

I'm not saying that they are bad computers. But the most recent is what... 5 years old? It's an eternity in computing.
While I agree, its just a little bit of software. My thinking is that Apple would not put the effort in for the small amount of sales (it would need Leopard and probably Tiger drivers to make any sort of numbers even closely worthwhile). Also, there is the planned obsolescence which helps drive sales of cash cows like Intel Macs.
__________________
Read the Rules / Search the Forums / Use a Descriptive Title
Mac Won't Boot?
flopticalcube is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 01:28 PM   #5
Brien
macrumors 68000
 
Brien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Planned obsolescence is right. The days of Apple supporting hardware for 7-10 years are over. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple drops support for 32-bit systems (Core Duo, basically) with 10.7.
Brien is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 01:58 PM   #6
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 604
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brien View Post
Planned obsolescence is right.
QFT. It's the same reason why the low end iMac's come with the 4670, when they could easily afford to give them 57xx and still appear a premium brand.
__________________
MacBook 17" MacBook Pro iPod Nano Apple TV
PS4 Custom Windows 8.1 Desktop WP8.1
"Good judgment comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgment."
- Mulla Nasrudin
thejadedmonkey is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 03:34 PM   #7
MacHamster68
macrumors 68040
 
MacHamster68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
thats only apple , even microsoft offers support for older pc from the same age as the g4 , g5 Mac's , for example windows 7 has as a minimum requirement of a 1ghz 32 bit or 64 bit processor , and i def works on intel P3 processors and on the K6 from AMD which both are from ....1999 ? .... 2000? , so microsoft supports with his newest operating system from 2009 computers which are over 10 years old !!! and windows XP supports even lower spec so much much older systems PC with 300 megahertz or higher processor clock speed recommended; 233 MHz minimum required (single or dual processor system);* Intel Pentium/Celeron family, or AMD K6/Athlon/Duron family,which are computers from the mid end 90's of the last century aehm... do not start with what the different linux distros support as that would need to much space

but as i always compare windows operating systems with Mac osx versions i put osx tiger as a equivalent to windows xp , so and as i do not like osx leopard very much i put it always into the position of windows vista equivalent , as like vista osx leopard was just a stopgap for snow leopard , so it would have been nice from apple to bring full support to osx tiger , the reason for tiger is as it does run on the G3 processors too
and its just my opinion , transition to intel was bad , but unavoidable at that point , so i dont start about that again , but i find apple should care more about its heritage , because without the G3 and G4 powerpc Mac's Apple would not be here now , the iMac G3 rescued apple from going bankrupt and how does apple say thank you ....we stop support for ppc Mac's , so now its of my chest for a while
__________________
DANGER POST MAY CONTAIN SARCASM
Intelligence does not need Intel inside,
All it needs is good sense outside.
MacHamster68 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 27, 2010, 03:40 PM   #8
MacHamster68
macrumors 68040
 
MacHamster68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
a damn now i lost it what i actually did want to say , there is a way around that dilemma ...linux will support the trackpad ...dont know which distro first but i guess ubuntu and as for windows will have drivers too very soon i suppose , and as i know microsoft then their will be windows xp driver , so if ya got a
old pentium 2 pc with 233 mhz then the trackpad will work on it in theory ...on a pc from 1997 and apple cant even be bothered to make it possible to use on a 5 year old Mac
__________________
DANGER POST MAY CONTAIN SARCASM
Intelligence does not need Intel inside,
All it needs is good sense outside.

Last edited by MacHamster68; Jul 27, 2010 at 03:45 PM.
MacHamster68 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2010, 02:22 AM   #9
drewdle
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nanaimo, BC
While I generally agree with the thoughts in this thread - why can't Apple be bothered to write drivers for older machines? - this shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone involved. Every Apple input device ever made in the OS X era has only supported the current OS upon it's release and up. Thus why you have the original Aluminum Bluetooth keyboards supporting Tiger, but not the second revision of them (10.5.8).

I don't want to turn this into another "PPC Kicks Ass!" debate, as we have a perfectly good one of those in a few other threads. It has to be said, however, that Apple is certainly in the business of making you buy their product. Five years on the market in computer terms may be an eternity, but does that matter if the equipment is still filling it's daily role? Why can Microsoft come out with new software (Office 2010 anyone?) that supports a 10 year old version of their operating system, and Apple completely snubs people who bought computers from them four to five years ago?
__________________
~ Drewdle ~
Mini 2.0Ghz C2D/2Gb RAM/120Gb/10.6.4
iMac G4 700Mhz/1Gb RAM/160Gb/10.4.11
iBook SE 466Mhz Graphite/576Mb RAM/160Gb/10.4.11
drewdle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2010, 03:12 AM   #10
Davy.Shalom
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Bahh it really pisses me off when they do this. However, I hate trackpads...glass or no glass, and multi touch really doesn't do much for me. I can't see much use in having a desktop trackpad, my mighty mouse is fine. Heck, even my Logitech MX1000 is fine. I really don't need anything new, so I'm not going to rant specifically about the trackpad, just Apple dropping support for our computers in general.

It's annoying, to think you're buying into security, stability, and support, when all you get in the end is planned obsolescence.

Thanks Apple, you're great to your customers.

*end of rant*
__________________
-Macbook Pro 13" 2.9 GHz i7, 16 GB RAM, 750 GB HD
-Mac Pro 8 core (3 GHz Xeon), 10 GB RAM, ATI Radeon X1900
-PowerMac G5: 2 x 2.3 GHz, 14 GB RAM, 1.5 TB HD
Davy.Shalom is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 28, 2010, 04:07 AM   #11
DesmoPilot
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Don't know why people are surprised at the lack of PPC support for the magic trackpad.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.66GHz w/HR-AG|OWC Data Doubler w/OCZ Vertex 2 180GB SSD and Hitachi 7K500 500GB HDD
Google Nexus S 4.1.1 Jelly Bean
DesmoPilot is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2010, 03:40 PM   #12
aphwarp
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacHamster68 View Post
thats only apple , even microsoft offers support for older pc from the same age as the g4 , g5 Mac's , for example windows 7 has as a minimum requirement of a 1ghz 32 bit or 64 bit processor , and i def works on intel P3 processors and on the K6 from AMD which both are from ....1999 ? .... 2000?
No offense intended but Microsoft makes its living by selling software, not hardware, as opposed to Apple, so I sense a good reason Apple wants people to buy their most recent hardware releases.

What's the point of making PPC compatible hardware/software if you are not selling PPC hardware anymore?

And it's not like Apple stopped supporting it as I am still getting software updates for my PPC OS X Leopard on my G4 Powerbook, but let's admit it, PPC days are over.
aphwarp is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 22, 2010, 07:46 PM   #13
MacHamster68
macrumors 68040
 
MacHamster68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Apple sells software too , but apple is known for just out of the blue stopping selling software discs , see leopard , see tiger, see panther ... and i mean retail disc's , whats the big issue with making disc's and selling them , the devellopment is done , no additional work needed , there are lots of people out there who still want these disc's , because the G4 and G5 Mac's are still the first step into Mac's ,for most its the Mac mini G4 , because not everyone on this earth is wealthy enough to buy a new Mac , and some might want to upgrade to leopard to get another couple years life out of their Mac's , but the only thing they get are scratched old 5th hand examples that sometimes dont even work
and the Mac mini G4 had bluetooth installed , so why not let these people upgrade to leopard and buy a magic trackpad if they want one ?
cant be that hard for a company like Apple to get a developer to write a driver for leopard or tiger , most of these developers apple has as employees would possibly only need a hour to do that , so the overall cost for apple would be marginal
__________________
DANGER POST MAY CONTAIN SARCASM
Intelligence does not need Intel inside,
All it needs is good sense outside.
MacHamster68 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2010, 12:57 AM   #14
Epsilon88
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Keep in mind that the Magic Trackpad costs just about half the value of many PPCs.
Epsilon88 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2010, 03:53 PM   #15
MacHamster68
macrumors 68040
 
MacHamster68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Epsilon88 View Post
Keep in mind that the Magic Trackpad costs just about half the value of many PPCs.
hmm good point, but then it is too not worth to buy a magic trackpad for the early intel's iMac , mini , which cost about the same as a iMac g5 isight here in the uk
if you see it that way , even the mighty mouse is not worth buying for your ppc Mac , not to mention the alu keyboard or even a wireless keyboard
to replace your broken one ...so once the keyboard and mouse are broken for one or the other reason , as they even cost used if they are still working nearly as much as a new one so only option then is..throw away the ppc Mac or ?
i mean i bought my PowerMac G5 2.3 dual for 10 ! ok scratched a bit on the outside and inside like a vacuum cleaner that was not emptied for 5 years , but working , i bought a brandnew alu keyboard for it and a mighty mouse both did cost me together more then 6 times what i payed for the PowerMac not to mention a new harddrive 1 TB , a osx tiger disc and a ilife 08 disc as i want to have for each Mac i own a set of disc's
and thats the point , if i want or need it i buy it , ok in case of the magic trackpad apple has decided i cant buy it for my ppc Mac's
__________________
DANGER POST MAY CONTAIN SARCASM
Intelligence does not need Intel inside,
All it needs is good sense outside.

Last edited by MacHamster68; Oct 23, 2010 at 04:17 PM.
MacHamster68 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23, 2010, 08:06 PM   #16
g4 powerbookboy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
iwork '09 works just fine on my first generation titanium powerbook. so looks like as long as your running tiger you will be able to keep using it for a while. the apple store still stocks replacement batteries and power adapters for it too.
g4 powerbookboy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Oct 24, 2010, 01:31 AM   #17
Epsilon88
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Magic Trackpad for my iBook would be awesome. iBook unfortunately didn't have a very large one.
Epsilon88 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > PowerPC Macs

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Magic Mouse, Magic Trackpad, or Wacom Tablet? melbrooke Mac Peripherals 4 Jan 26, 2014 12:04 PM
RSI? Should I Move from Magic Mouse to Magic Trackpad? ryan101 iMac 14 Aug 23, 2013 05:11 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC