Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 4, 2010, 12:53 PM   #1
Derkatwork
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Will apple drop the classic ipod

I have heard that the wheel is being removed in the future and that even the nano in the next year or two would turn into a mini touch screen. Is apple going to cut their "outdated" ipod classics to make way for the touch? Or will that happen net year?
__________________
Proud owner of an IPad 2 32GB
Aluminum Macbook Pro: 2.53 GHz, 4 GB Ram
Derkatwork is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2010, 12:58 PM   #2
blairbeckwith
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
This speculation happens every time, and I'm afraid everytime.

I'm sure I fall in to a very niche section of the community, but I have over 130 GB of music. Sure, I don't need to carry it all everywhere with me, but I want to. For this, I have a 160 GB classic. I also have an old 120 GB classic that I use strictly for video. It houses every season of Entourage, The Office, and Weeds, as well as a number of movies. I use this to carry my videos around to various TV's around the house and friend's places, and I don't know of a better solution.

But, alas, I really do see them axing it sooner rather then later.
blairbeckwith is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2010, 01:19 PM   #3
Derkatwork
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Quote:
Originally Posted by blairbeckwith View Post
I have a 160 GB classic. I also have an old 120 GB classic that I use strictly for video.
That's cool. I have memories with the old ipods that brought them to where they are. I'm just wondering if apple looks back at where they've been, or if they are just droning into the future at this point.
__________________
Proud owner of an IPad 2 32GB
Aluminum Macbook Pro: 2.53 GHz, 4 GB Ram
Derkatwork is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2010, 02:42 PM   #4
nightpwnsj00
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
I really hope not. I'm currently in the wait-and-see-or-buy-it-now mode, as my Classic is dead, and I really need to get another (my 16GB Nano, while nice, is nowhere near a Classic replacement). Hopefully the Classic sticks around for at least another year, and gets a capacity boot while at it, but I'm really doubting that now.
__________________
20" iMac G5, 2.1 GHz, 2GB RAM, 250GB HD / 15.4" MacBook Pro with Hi-Res AntiGlare screen, i7 2.66GHz, 4GB RAM, 500GB HD / 16GB iPod Nano 4G
nightpwnsj00 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2010, 03:03 PM   #5
Derkatwork
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightpwnsj00 View Post
Hopefully the Classic sticks around for at least another year, and gets a capacity boot while at it, but I'm really doubting that now.
Did you see something that indicates either way?
__________________
Proud owner of an IPad 2 32GB
Aluminum Macbook Pro: 2.53 GHz, 4 GB Ram
Derkatwork is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2010, 12:51 PM   #6
Peterson8765
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Oregon
I don't think it will be dropped, but it probably will be updated this year with some new features since it's been 3 years without any new features but a capacity jump and genius. I also think it will probably evolve into a touch screen at some point, and in a few years when flash memory is dirt cheap, it will probably have 128GB of flash memory for $249.l
__________________
Early 2009 Mac mini 2GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, 120GB HD, nVidia GeForce 9400m graphics
Peterson8765 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2010, 12:54 PM   #7
appleguy123
macrumors 603
 
appleguy123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 15 minutes in the future
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derkatwork View Post
Did you see something that indicates either way?
Well for one thing when they show iPod sales on a slide the picture only showed iPod nano and touch.
__________________
[Steve Jobs was] brave enough to think differently, bold enough to believe he could change the world, and talented enough to do it. -Barack Obama
appleguy123 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2010, 12:57 PM   #8
Derkatwork
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Quote:
Originally Posted by appleguy123 View Post
Well for one thing when they show iPod sales on a slide the picture only showed iPod nano and touch.
Maybe they are only showing the big sellers, since the classic ipod isn't as popular as the touch.
__________________
Proud owner of an IPad 2 32GB
Aluminum Macbook Pro: 2.53 GHz, 4 GB Ram
Derkatwork is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2010, 01:49 PM   #9
MCRunning
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
I don't think so. Not everyone wants a touch
MCRunning is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2010, 06:37 PM   #10
jmoore5196
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: London
I like to think that there are enough folks who need the extra storage capacity to keep the Classic line running for years to come.

While I don't have 130gb of music, I do have 130gb of movies and television series. The Classic is the only device (other than my MBP) with enough storage to contain and play all that video content.

I love my touch, and my new iPhone 4. But I couldn't see giving up my Classic for either one. Storage is more important than screen real estate, at least to me. I don't know how they'd upgrade the Classic in the next round of updates ... a little more capacity couldn't hurt, but I really don't see that helping sales. I just hope there's enough demand to stop the axe falling anytime soon.
jmoore5196 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 5, 2010, 08:12 PM   #11
iEvolution
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Despite what apple seems to show, the classic has ALWAYS been ahead of the nano and shuffle in the Top 10 at AMAZON as far as mp3 player sales go every time I check.

From a marketing stand point I WOULDN'T THINK that apple would want to get rid of it just for the fact it is in its own league with no competitors now.

However, apple has done some dumb things in the past, uh-hem 3rd gen shuffle.. so they might just get rid of it. Since capacity seems to be the biggest attractive factor of the classic I really don't see why they don't go back to dual layer because most of us don't care if it is a little thick.

As far as dual layer goes the highest out is 320GB, as far as single layer hard drives go I still only see 160gb. Usually you can get some sort of announcement before the iPod Classic comes out to indicate a capacity update, but there is nothing in the single layer market that has been released it seems.

At the end of august I plan on purchasing a 160gb iPod Classic and not opening it until the announcements, at which point if there is a larger capacity available I'll take it back and pick up a new one, if not I'll use this one and assume it is the end of the classic.

Last edited by iEvolution; Aug 5, 2010 at 08:19 PM.
iEvolution is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 01:31 AM   #12
bindle
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
I'll probably jump ship if their highest capacity iPod doesn't have a click wheel. As someone who listens to music constantly when walking or driving, having to fiddle with a touch screen device to navigate music is such a deal breaker - & dangerous in the car. With the click wheel I don't even have to look.

I think they'll be keeping the classic around though - at least for another year. I'm getting a high capacity music player this year. Hopefully it's an iPod.
bindle is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 06:00 AM   #13
Derkatwork
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milwaukee
Quote:
Originally Posted by bindle View Post
As someone who listens to music constantly when walking or driving, having to fiddle with a touch screen device to navigate music is such a deal breaker - & dangerous in the car.
Isn't it dangerous to play with an ipod at all while driving? Also, while this is just me, I find the touchscreen easier to use.
__________________
Proud owner of an IPad 2 32GB
Aluminum Macbook Pro: 2.53 GHz, 4 GB Ram
Derkatwork is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 06:27 AM   #14
CampDavid
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
I hope not.

I had an original 5GB iPod and it took so much abuse it's untrue over the 3 years I used it regularly. My current 80GB takes the strain now and I doubt my touch would cope with it's large touch screen.

As a music player the touch just isn't anywhere near the device the classic is
CampDavid is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 08:17 AM   #15
Googlyhead
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by iEvolution View Post
Despite what apple seems to show, the classic has ALWAYS been ahead of the nano and shuffle in the Top 10 at AMAZON as far as mp3 player sales go every time I check.
Probably a little distorted figures, as there's a fair few different models of Nano (each colour and capacity) which will likely be counted as entirely separate products vs. a limited choice of Classic.
Googlyhead is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 08:25 AM   #16
OGDaniel
macrumors 6502a
 
OGDaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Arizona
I love the Classic, and I hope they don't get rid of it, and I don't think they will. If not the same Classic, then some kind of variation of it. They didn't get rid of the all-in-one Mac, just made variations of it.
__________________
I shiny things
Search before you post: MRoogle
OGDaniel is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 08:46 AM   #17
TRAG
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisiana, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by blairbeckwith View Post
This speculation happens every time, and I'm afraid everytime.

I'm sure I fall in to a very niche section of the community, but I have over 130 GB of music. Sure, I don't need to carry it all everywhere with me, but I want to. For this, I have a 160 GB classic. I also have an old 120 GB classic that I use strictly for video. It houses every season of Entourage, The Office, and Weeds, as well as a number of movies. I use this to carry my videos around to various TV's around the house and friend's places, and I don't know of a better solution.

But, alas, I really do see them axing it sooner rather then later.
I'm in that niche category asa well. I have an iPhone and I have to limit myself to about 25 GB and the rest be for apps and photos. But with my classic I keep my entire library on it. About 40 GB of music and about 100 GB of movies. It's great for the car.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MCRunning View Post
I don't think so. Not everyone wants a touch
I wouldn't like to have to choose between an undersized (in GB) iPod nano or a fragile Touch. I feel like if anyone wants a Touch they could do themselves better by getting an iPhone, which is what I did. I don't want to have to worry about cracking my display on every device I have or having a phone and an iPod. The sturdy iPod Classics (and older gens) have always been my favorite iPod.
__________________
13.3" MacBook Pro iPhone 4 iPod Classic
TRAG is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 10:01 AM   #18
rgarjr
macrumors 601
 
rgarjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calif
With audio CDs becoming obsolete, lots folks are turning to their iPods to play their tunes in their cars. The classic being the best choice.
__________________
instagram : @rgarjr
rgarjr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 11:45 AM   #19
Vesuvio Cat
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
iPod "Classic" isn't going to be axed. It has become a mainstay for higher-end iPod integrated car and home stereos. Look for iPod as a "moving library" to be emphasized with other improvements to lure in the faithful .
__________________
15" MacBook Pro, 2.4GHz, 4 GB RAM, 200 GB HD; iPhone 3GS 32 GB; iPad 64 GB Wi-Fi; 32 GB iPod Touch 2G; 64 GB iPod Touch 3G; 160 GB iPod Classic; 4 GB iPod Nano
Vesuvio Cat is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 12:01 PM   #20
bindle
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derkatwork View Post
Isn't it dangerous to play with an ipod at all while driving? Also, while this is just me, I find the touchscreen easier to use.
Not really - surely a lot less dangerous than giving attention to a touch screen ipod. My point is I can pick up my ipod in one hand and easily navigate songs simply with the click wheel - without looking. You get the clicking sounds and tactile feedback. A touch screen would involve me having to take my eyes off the road to look at where I'm touching.
bindle is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPod

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When will apple drop the core II duo ? iCaleb MacBook Air 5 Sep 21, 2010 06:21 AM
Will Apple drop the TV price in the UK now rentals are out? nick9191 Apple TV and Home Theater 14 Jun 24, 2008 11:31 AM
Will Apple drop the 512 Shuffle? MacSA iPod 22 May 7, 2005 01:22 AM
Will Apple keep the Classic iMac around? DakotaGuy General Mac Discussion 18 Jan 21, 2002 10:13 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC