Isnt the ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB graphics card a little old to be in the new mac pros? Isnt that card almost a year old?
Isnt the ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB graphics card a little old to be in the new mac pros? Isnt that card almost a year old?
It's the best card out there of the ATI generation of Cypress GPUs. What's wrong with it?
Well if you are going to spend at least $3000 on a computer why would you want the graphics card to be almost a year old?
Ok, can you name me a GPU from ATI that isn't?
Probably not, I just dont want to buy a 3k computer then in a year have the card be obsolete and have to fork over $400 for a better card.
At least if I bought the computer a year ago I would have gotten two years out of the card or three if im lucky.
I could just buy a pc but I know I would really miss osx.
The problem with saying you want a "better" card is that better means nothing. When you say "better" you should say what you want it to do.
I just read of review of a very high end Eizo monitor. The reviewer stated that the 5870 was one of the very few GPUs that had a 10bit data path (I assume per channel) through the Display Port, and so was using it in his Mac Pro.
For him, "better" meant more colours. For others "better" may mean more more FPS, or more output ports.
Also, IMO if you are building a workstation for doing work, the majority of people would rather use technology that will not crash because the vendor is still ironing out the bugs. Bleeding edge stuff can tend to fall down go poof. Not good for deadlines.
Probably not, I just dont want to buy a 3k computer then in a year have the card be obsolete and have to fork over $400 for a better card.
At least if I bought the computer a year ago I would have gotten two years out of the card or three if im lucky.
I could just buy a pc but I know I would really miss osx.
They could have gone with an Nvidia 470 or 480 solution, which is half a year old now. Would that have made you happier? But wait, the 5870 is just as fast.
Isnt the ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB graphics card a little old to be in the new mac pros? Isnt that card almost a year old?
The problem with saying you want a "better" card is that better means nothing. When you say "better" you should say what you want it to do.
I just read of review of a very high end Eizo monitor. The reviewer stated that the 5870 was one of the very few GPUs that had a 10bit data path (I assume per channel) through the Display Port, and so was using it in his Mac Pro.
For him, "better" meant more colours. For others "better" may mean more more FPS, or more output ports.
Also, IMO if you are building a workstation for doing work, the majority of people would rather use technology that will not crash because the vendor is still ironing out the bugs. Bleeding edge stuff can tend to fall down go poof. Not good for deadlines.
The problem with saying you want a "better" card is that better means nothing. When you say "better" you should say what you want it to do.
I just read of review of a very high end Eizo monitor. The reviewer stated that the 5870 was one of the very few GPUs that had a 10bit data path (I assume per channel) through the Display Port, and so was using it in his Mac Pro.
For him, "better" meant more colours. For others "better" may mean more more FPS, or more output ports.
Also, IMO if you are building a workstation for doing work, the majority of people would rather use technology that will not crash because the vendor is still ironing out the bugs. Bleeding edge stuff can tend to fall down go poof. Not good for deadlines.
Are you sure that wasn't the Radeon HD 4870? Which also supports 10bit.
Nvidia should offer cooking lessons with the GTX 480 🙄
OP is a troll or just doesnt understand what he is talking about at all...