am I just crazy?
You're not crazy, and the iPhone 4 display is nice but nothing new.
It's just a small IPS display. I've had the same exact technology on my ThinkPad displays for over five years.
the iPhone 4 display is nice but nothing new.
It's just a small IPS display. I've had the same exact technology on my ThinkPad displays for over five years.
You're not crazy, and the iPhone 4 display is nice but nothing new.
It's just a small IPS display. I've had the same exact technology on my ThinkPad displays for over five years.
Its got by far the highest DPI of any screen ever brought to market, and probably about 4x the DPI of your ThinkPad. That's something "new".
The 2008 LG-LU1400 phone had a higher PPI... 333 vs 326. It's probably one reason Apple went with an LG display.
The 2007 Toshiba Portege G900 was the first smartphone advertised with "print quality" (300PPI or more) at 311 PPI. It's probably why Apple made up the "retina" term, so they wouldn't sound like second place and years late.
The 2008 Xperia X1 also had 311PPI.
The 2008 LG-LU1400 phone had a higher PPI... 333 vs 326. It's probably one reason Apple went with an LG display.
The 2007 Toshiba Portege G900 was the first smartphone advertised with "print quality" (300PPI or more) at 311 PPI. It's probably why Apple made up the "retina" term, so they wouldn't sound like second place and years late.
The 2008 Xperia X1 also had 311PPI.
Apple's in an interesting situation, display-wise, since they've apparently locked themselves into multiples of 480x320 for the iPhone. They cannot double the 960x640 again in the same screen size, as it make no visual or technical sense.
They also cannot increase the screen size without the PPI going down, although their definition of "retina" allows for that, since you can simply hold the device further away to achieve it.
Apple's in an interesting situation, display-wise, since they've apparently locked themselves into multiples of 480x320 for the iPhone. They cannot double the 960x640 again in the same screen size, as it make no visual or technical sense.
I can't stand to look at any other iPhones now.
The 2008 LG-LU1400 phone had a higher PPI... 333 vs 326. It's probably one reason Apple went with an LG display.
The 2007 Toshiba Portege G900 was the first smartphone advertised with "print quality" (300PPI or more) at 311 PPI. It's probably why Apple made up the "retina" term, so they wouldn't sound like second place and years late.
The 2008 Xperia X1 also had 311PPI.
Apple's in an interesting situation, display-wise, since they've apparently locked themselves into multiples of 480x320 for the iPhone. They cannot double the 960x640 again in the same screen size, as it make no visual or technical sense.
They also cannot increase the screen size without the PPI going down, although their definition of "retina" allows for that, since you can simply hold the device further away to achieve it.
Its got by far the highest DPI of any screen ever brought to market, and probably about 4x the DPI of your ThinkPad. That's something "new".
The 2008 LG-LU1400 phone had a higher PPI... 333 vs 326. It's probably one reason Apple went with an LG display.
The 2007 Toshiba Portege G900 was the first smartphone advertised with "print quality" (300PPI or more) at 311 PPI. It's probably why Apple made up the "retina" term, so they wouldn't sound like second place and years late.
The 2008 Xperia X1 also had 311PPI.
Apple's in an interesting situation, display-wise, since they've apparently locked themselves into multiples of 480x320 for the iPhone. They cannot double the 960x640 again in the same screen size, as it make no visual or technical sense.
They also cannot increase the screen size without the PPI going down, although their definition of "retina" allows for that, since you can simply hold the device further away to achieve it.
Ok fine, the highest DPI screen ever brought to market outside of Korea.
buzz killington...
but yes, i agree. every time i take a dump i end up there for longer than necessary .
Try going outside and staring at REAL-LIFEp. I think you will be amazed with its clarity and detail.
Then again you're in Arizona so maybe you won't
Try going outside and staring at REAL-LIFEp. I think you will be amazed with its clarity and detail.
Then again you're in Arizona so maybe you won't
yeahhhhh, okay buddy. I lived in Scottsdale for 18 years. I have traveled to every major city, and many small towns in Arizona and it is very beautiful land. From the painted deserts to the snowy mountains, it's truly spectacular. Just because AZ doesn't have a huge bridge doesn't mean AZ isn't magnificent....quite the contrary in fact....