10.2.8 Upgrade-Yes or No?

Discussion in 'General Mac Discussion' started by 18thTomorrow, Apr 26, 2004.

  1. 18thTomorrow
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2004
    Location:
    The Alpha Quadrant
    #1
    Hello,

    I have a 350 Mhz Blue/White G3 running OS 10.2.6 right now. I was doing some (long overdue) system updating and couldn't decide whether to go for the 10.2.8 update or not. 2.6 has been as stable as I could ask for and runs well.
    What do you think? Should I let well enough alone, or could my machine handle the next level?

    Britt
     
  2. tomf87
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    tomf87

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    #2
    I don't think the upgrade from 10.2.6 to 10.2.8 is that major of an upgrade so hardware should not be a problem.

    I ran 10.2.8 on my iMac prior to 10.3 and the latest update was stable.

    EDIT: You may search for 'upgrade 10.2.8' through the forums to see if anyone else with a G3 experienced issues.
     
  3. russed
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    russed

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2004
    Location:
    London, England
    #3
    when i was running 10.2.8 it appeared to be fine to me.
     
  4. King Cobra
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2002
    #4
    Go for it. 10.2.8 is about the best that Jaguar gets... (I'll leave the "best that OS X gets" debate to those with Panther and prefer it.)
     
  5. Flynnstone
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Flynnstone

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Location:
    Cold beer land
    #5
    Did you have any problem going from 10.2.4 up?
    I tried to upgrade the same machine (I think), I think 2.4 to 2.5 was a problem.
    After the upgrade, it wouldn't boot. :(
     
  6. Awimoway
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Location:
    at the edge
    #6
    Why bother? Why take the chance? 10.2.8 was a disaster for many people. I would leave it alone. I upgraded to Panther straight from 10.2.6.
     
  7. tomf87
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    tomf87

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    #7
    The first version had an issue with Powerbooks and some iMac's. And they fixed that with the second release.

    Of course, if 10.2.6 is running fine, then it is always a safe bet to stay put.
     
  8. bousozoku
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #8
    There is not likely to be a problem running 10.2.8. I was running it fine on my G3/400 before upgrading to 10.3. There was a decent performance increase in either over 10.2.6, too.
     
  9. Awimoway
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2002
    Location:
    at the edge
    #9
    Sorry. I forgot that. You're right. :)
     
  10. Chappers
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    Chappers

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Location:
    At home
    #10
    Well I was different - I had problems with 10.2.6 (iMac 800 17 inch G4) upgraded to 10.2.8 and am very happy. If you're happy then stay that way.
     
  11. MrMacMan
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    MrMacMan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Location:
    1 Block away from NYC.
    #11
    I'm running 10.2.8 right now.

    I can't explain how it got faster... it just did.


    I upgraded my machine a few times, 10.2.8 is worth it.
     
  12. Flynnstone
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Flynnstone

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Location:
    Cold beer land
    #12
    I like you signature!
    If you what it faster, perhaps :
    BRA *

    To slow it down,
    NOP or BRN *
    ;)
     
  13. bousozoku
    Expand Collapse
    Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #13
    Thanks, but it changes depending on my rank (processor), so I leave it alone mostly since most processors have similar options. Besides, you're changing the meaning. However, I use the optimising signature assembler to make sure it doesn't slow down the forums at all. ;) :D
     
  14. ThomasJefferson
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    Virginia
    #14
    I am running it on my G3 ibook 600. No problems at all.
     
  15. Sparky's
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Sparky's

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    #15
    Another one for the positive. I'm running 10.2.8 on my G3-400 with an upgrade CPU (G4-500) and video card(Radeon 7000 32mb), plus an additional 80gb internal HD. My results are solid, for about 6 months now and no crashes, freezes, or any other problems. I leave my machine on 24/7 for the Folding and its the most stable my machine has been since I bought it (4 years ago)
     
  16. Dont Hurt Me
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #16
    Im running 10.2.8 and very happy with it, I like to wait until the .3 or .4 before going into the new OS because of bugs. about to go panther but may wait until G5 gets a G5 OS and then a new machine.
     

Share This Page