10.4.9? Been awfully quiet...

Discussion in 'macOS' started by netdog, Feb 19, 2007.

  1. netdog macrumors 603

    netdog

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #1
    Seems like the last seed was more than a week ago. Wondering when we might see 10.4.9 seeded again or released?
     
  2. dllavaneras macrumors 68000

    dllavaneras

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Location:
    Caracas, Venezuela
    #2
    Normally how soon is the "last" (as in 10.x.9) version of an OS published before the release of the nex major update? IIRC it's about a month or so...
     
  3. PlaceofDis macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #3
    well considering they seeded it, and then seeded it again. i'm guessing that they're still working on all the bugs. it hasn't been terribly long since it was seeded so perhaps a couple more weeks.

    also this doesn't have to be the last update before. 10.5
     
  4. zephead macrumors 68000

    zephead

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2006
    Location:
    in your pants
    #4
    OS 9.2 was released after OS X came out in 2001, so it's not entirely impossible that 10.4.9 is released after 10.5 (probably for interoperability fixes and such).
     
  5. dllavaneras macrumors 68000

    dllavaneras

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Location:
    Caracas, Venezuela
    #5
    Hence my quotes. I know they can go to 10.4.9.1 and the like, ad infinitum.
    I just hope they release both updates soon :D
     
  6. stoid macrumors 601

    stoid

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2002
    Location:
    So long, and thanks for all the fish!
    #6
    or 10.4.10 ;)

    It'll be out tomorrow with new hardware.
     
  7. risc macrumors 68030

    risc

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #7
    Why would they go 10.4.9.1 and not 10.4.10? The .9 has nothing to do with how close they are to the 10.5 release it is just the point release number of 10.4.
     
  8. davidjearly macrumors 68020

    davidjearly

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    #8
    Oh no, not this again! How can people possibly not get this? lol!

    David
     
  9. mattscott306 macrumors 68040

    mattscott306

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    #9
    But 10.4.10... Thats just bad math! That's restarting at 10.4.1 (becuase adding the 0 after the 1 imo shouldn't change it mathematically). Yes I know the extra "." doesn't really qualify it as a true float.
    Eh, I guess I need to stop trying to convince myself leopard is releasing soon.
     
  10. davidjearly macrumors 68020

    davidjearly

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    #10
    It's not bad math at all. That makes no sense.
     
  11. mattscott306 macrumors 68040

    mattscott306

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    #11
    It made sense in my head, when I was trying to delude myself into beleiving the release of Leopard would be tomorrow.
     
  12. davidjearly macrumors 68020

    davidjearly

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2006
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    #12
    It's ok, I understand. We are all longing for the same thing.
     
  13. eluk macrumors 6502a

    eluk

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Location:
    East London, UK
    #13
    It has nothing to do with maths. It is purely cataloguing.
     
  14. gikku macrumors regular

    gikku

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Location:
    -33.82,151.26

Share This Page