10th planet around the Sun found?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by vniow, Mar 14, 2004.

  1. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #1
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,8968352%5E29098,00.html
     
  2. macrumors G3

    Counterfit

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Location:
    sitting on your shoulder
    #2
    Interesting...

    And I still laugh at that 'tar :D
     
  3. macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
  4. macrumors 65816

    Ambrose Chapel

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    #4
    i say right here and now that we need to put an astronaut on Sedna!
    :p
     
  5. Guest

    #5
    Actually I think it will ultimately lead to Pluto not being a Planet

    Pluto's status as a planet has been hotly debated for years some saying it is a moon of planet No. 8 Neptune that was thrown out of orbit due to a meteorite/planetesimal impact (possible Pluto's current moon Charon) or that it is a planetesimal that used to have a different orbit that was shifted further inward again due to a meteorite impact. I personally believe with the discovery of more and more Pluto-size and slightly smaller planetesimal objects from the Kuiper-Belt (Sedna is not the first one) it will ultimately lead to Pluto being removed from the list of planets and listed as a planetesimal instead. The more interesting fact is that the very existence of the Kuiper-Belt rules out the existence of another planet which would have be something Neptune-size since if there was such a planet the Kuiper-Belt wouldn't exist. If you look at the space between Jupiter and Neptune its pretty wiped clean. So my bet is it will lead to Sol having 8 planets instead of 9.
    Cheers,

    Ahmed
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2004
    Location:
    South Australia
    #6
    Go "The Australian" (news paper,) very interesting though, must be very hard to spot since there wold be so little light out there.
     
  7. macrumors 604

    MrMacMan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Location:
    1 Block away from NYC.
    #7
    Yeah Pluto is gonna be replaced...

    Too bad, I liked pluto...

    I thought it was part of that metor belt not another moon...

    Ah well...

    Sorry Pluto.
     
  8. macrumors 601

    virividox

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2003
    Location:
    Manila - Nottingham - Philadelphia - Santa Barbar
    #8
    well people are still arguing if sedna will be a planet, hell ppl still argue that pluto isnt a planet!!!
     
  9. macrumors 68030

    themadchemist

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Location:
    Chi Town
    #9
    How significant is it whether we call Pluto a planet or a planetesimal? I don't know about this, so I'm wondering...Does it REALLY make that much difference?
     
  10. macrumors 601

    BornAgainMac

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2004
    Location:
    Florida Resident
    #10
    Klingons

    I wish space was as interesting as SciFi. No Star Destroyers, Cylons, Klingons, Death Stars, Jedi, Borg, or Vipers. Instead of doing the Space Station, it would have been nice to build something that looks like the Enterprise even if it just stayed in Orbit. Maybe in another 500 years we will have a shuttle with phasers since the Taliban will have ships by then.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    Krizoitz

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2003
    Location:
    Seattle, WA USA
    #11
    Naw too much tradition, and it doesn't hurt anyone to keep it there.
     
  12. Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #12
    It will be debate ad nausium, but nothing will ever come of it in terms of being called a planet. The only way we'll get a tenth planet will be if the one found is significantly larger than Pluto. Like stated above, there has been significant debate on whether Pluto should be a planet (it will always be considered one - even if only by tradition).

    D
     
  13. TEG
    macrumors 604

    TEG

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2002
    Location:
    Langley, Washington
    #13
    Star Trek Was Right

    I remember a comment in an episode of the original series where Kirk talks about the 10 planets of the Sol System (or Terran System). It is interesting to think that scientists (or maybe writers) thought there was a tenth planet back then, only now to find out it may in fact be true.

    TEG
     
  14. Guest

    #14
    Well at first glance none. From a scientific viewpoint however it does make a difference because it decides on the factors that make a planet a planet or a planetesimal a planetesimal. The reason why Pluto was so hotly contested in the first place is because it doesn't conform with the rules that were used so far. That is why it makes a difference because if you say Pluto is a planet, why are for example Vesta, or Ceres, two very large meteorites in the asteroide belt between Mars and Jupiter not planets. Or Sedna, or a whole lot of other equally large objects still to be found in the Kuiper Belt? We say Vesta and Ceres are not planets because they are part of the larger structure of the asteroide belt. Now if we say large Pluto-size objects of the Kuiper Belt such as Sedna are not Planets then how can we say Pluto is one now that it turns out that Pluto might be a former Kuiper Belt object that got its orbit shifted? So from a scientific viewpoint its a very significant issue because it defines the rules by which we map the content of the solar system.
    Cheers,

    Ahmed
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    srobert

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
  16. Guest

    #16
    Hmm what interests me more is the question whether there is a chance for a Neptune size planet beyond the Kuiper Belt. I remember reading something in Nature about that, saying that it is unlikely for certain reasons. Also what interests me is the current model for the solar system beyond Neptune. There is the Kuiper Belt, but how far do they believe it goes? What is beyond that and before you reach Oort's comet cloud at about 1 lightyear away from the Sun? Empty space? Anyone got some info on that?
    Cheers,

    Ahmed
     
  17. macrumors 68020

    srobert

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2002
    #17
    Not to scale but you got rough estimate of distances:

    [​IMG]
     
  18. Guest

    #18
    Ahh thanks! One last question and I am quiet :D

    I also read in Nature a while ago that there is an strange effect on probes such as Pioneer 10 and 11, as well as the Voyagers that seems to slow them down on the way out, much more than was expected. I remember vaguely reading somewhere else that some scientists believe it might be another planet of enormous size far beyond Pluto, which in order to not contradict the current model of the formation of our solar system which doesn't allow another planet beyond Neptune might have been a vagabond planet that previously was not part of the solar system?
    Cheers,

    Ahmed
     
  19. Guest

    #19
    I actually found it myself...

    http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/Anomalous/Acceleration.html

    Dust. How boring. :eek:
    Cheers,

    Ahmed
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Location:
    USA
    #20
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3511678.stm

    In that article, they mention that the name could be changed so that it matches the Graeco-Roman names of the other planets. I personally don't see the need for that. Any thoughts?

    Also, I never knew there was a KB astro-body named Varuna.. my name is Varun (from God Varuna), cool. :cool:
     
  21. macrumors 68000

    agreenster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2001
    Location:
    Walt Disney Animation Studios
    #21
    This just goes to show how little we actually know about the universe, if we are even still finding planets in our own solar system.
     
  22. macrumors 68040

    Macmaniac

    #22
    The sad thing is that even if we do get new Science Textbooks, that won't happen for a long time, by that we will have landed on Mars. I'd like to see another planet classified, I always liked the number 10, 10 planets is such a nice round number.
     
  23. Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Kepler-452b
    #23
    Sedna doesn't sound like much of a tourist destination (20 degrees above absolute zero at the distant part of its orbit), but observing it from afar should be interesting, as we try to learn why it rotates so slowly (only once every 40 of our days), why it is shiny (it reflects 1/5 to 1/4 of the sunlight it receives), what it is made of, and whether it has a moon.

    Will Disney name a dog cartoon character "Sedna"?
     
  24. macrumors 68020

    bennetsaysargh

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Location:
    New York
    #24
    i will call pluto a planet. i always will because it's the way i was taught. maybe add sedna. no chance we'll be going there anytime within this millennium. too cold :(.
     
  25. macrumors G3

    Counterfit

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Location:
    sitting on your shoulder
    #25
    I wonder if anyone wants to "add" to Gustav Holst's work for the newer planets... ;)
     

Share This Page