Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

NewSc2

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jun 4, 2005
1,044
2
New York, NY
Been waiting to purchase a Macbook Pro for some time :D :D

Anyways, I plan on using a 30" LCD with my Macbook Pro for mostly audio work. I see both have dual-DVI. Anyways, is there a significant difference between the two on the 30" screen?

I'm trying to justify the $500 bump from 2.16ghz to 2.33ghz, but if the video option isn't a biggie then I will probably go with the cheaper one. Too bad you can't customize the 2.16ghz MBP to 256mb VRAM.
 

macuserx86

macrumors 6502a
Jun 12, 2006
622
3
Basically, more VRAM helps the card deal with higher resolutions, so the answer is yes, the graphics are a very important option, especially if you want to run another, high res monitor.
As far as CPU, I wouldn't bother unless you have the cash. Personally, I would save my money and max the RAM out; that's were you will really feel the difference.

so, rundown:
go with the better graphics
forget the upgraded CPU
load it up with RAM
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.