13" and 15" MacBook Pros Have a Slower SATA Interface

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jun 14, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    As first described in our forums, Apple seems to have quietly downgraded the SATA Interface from 3.0Gbit to 1.5Gbit speeds in some of the new MacBook Pros introduced last week. Readers are reporting that both the new 13" and 15" MacBook Pro models are affected while the 13" MacBook (white), 17" MacBook Pro and 13" MacBook Air retain the 3.0Gbit SATA interface. SATA is the interface between a computer and its hard drives.

    The slower SATA interface is unlikely to affect the bulk of users as even the fastest traditional hard drives are unable to saturate even the 1.5 Gbit interfaces. However, if you are planning on buying a fast Solid State Drive (SSD), it could affect the drive's performance. The downgrade of the interface in the new MacBook Pro has also been confirmed in early benchmarks using a fast enough SSD. Forum user fpnc provides an excellent summary of the findings so far:
    While there is a lot of speculation about if this could be "corrected" by software in the future, there are no definitive answers. At a minimum, it should serve as a caution for those customers who were planning on upgrading to fast SSD drives in their new 13" or 15" MacBook Pros. While you may still see performance benefits over traditional hard drives, the total benefit may be blunted.

    Article Link: 13" and 15" MacBook Pros Have a Slower SATA Interface
     
  2. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    #2
    Thank you. Now that you've posted the story there's a much better chance that the other tech sites will pick it up.
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    #3
    Won't notice

    I think the majority of users won't notice it, but we'll see
     
  4. macrumors 68000

    Me1000

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    #4
    Wow, Apple... This is really lame!
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    #5
    I am mad that Apple didn't state this downgrade before I returned my uMBP I bought a week before WWDC. They better fix this ASAP.
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Jayomat

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    #6
    sorry for the noob question, but is it cheaper for apple to go back to 1,5 ? i guess....
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    #7
    Gives me a reason to spend the extra money on a 17 inch, despite not really wanting the extra size and weight.

    Unless this can be resolved by a firmware upgrade, I want to know that I can stick an SSD into my machine in a few years when they are cheaper and get the performance I paid for.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    cohibadad

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    #8
    ouch. This is very disappointing if not correctable via software. I have an intel ssd in my 15" unibody MBP and was considering flipping it to one of the updated 15" models when I get a new batch for work. That won't be happening until this question is answered. Thanks for the heads up.
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    #9
    thank you for posting really hoping this will get more attention on other major sites and apple will catch on
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    drew0020

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2006
    #10
    I hope this is correctable with a software fix. Otherwise this is a disgrace Apple!
     
  11. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    #11
    One step forward, two steps back.
     
  12. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    #12
    It's the same chip as the previous gen that was running a 3gb so hardware was unchanged. They seem to have crippled it through firmware or software.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    KingYaba

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2005
    Location:
    Up the irons
    #13
    No SSD for you!
     

    Attached Files:

  14. macrumors 68040

    Phil A.

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Location:
    Telford, UK
    #14
    AFAIK, before the NVidia chipset was introduced, all the mac portables used 1.5GBit SATA interfaces. It seems to me that for some reason Apple introducce 3.0GBit for a short while and then took it away again.

    It does seem a bit lame, but I can't imagine it having much of a real world impact on most notebook users even with SSDs - it's not very often people read or move huge files (> 150MB) around on the internal hard disk so any real world performance hit is likely to be minimal. Even 1.5GB SATA is far faster than Firewire 800 so it really isn't that much of an issue...
     
  15. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    #15
    Could the slower interface improve battery life?
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    #16
    How is this two steps backwards? If anything, the new MBPs are 10 steps forward, one step backwards.

    I mean really... you're not going to notice.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Unprocessed1

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    #17
    No, that's a false rumor.
     
  18. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2008
    #18
    Apple giveth, Apple taketh away. :(
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    #19
    Oh that's funny... 'cause your signature states that you're using a 5400rpm HD. Even if you plan on upgrading to SSD in the future, I'm going to go out on a limb and say you won't ever see a difference in performance.

    Do you have any idea how fast 1.5Gb/s is? 3Gb/s interfaces on laptops are for spec-whores.
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    Unprocessed1

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    #20
    Maybe he wanted to install a 3rd party SSD, which is both faster and cheaper, like a rational person? Think of that?
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2007
    #21
    Are they becoming Dell/HP or something?

    Seriously, this type of cost saving maneuvers that become the system "Gotchas" when spec'ing a machine is worthy of Dell or HP the way they take small little things out that cost pennies but they do it to save cash anyway.

    Sure hope this is a bug, as it is real lame of Apple to play this game.
     
  22. macrumors regular

    alexeismertin

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Location:
    Bristol, UK
    #22
    a test

    If somebody has an SSD Macbook/Pro showing SATA at 3g & access to the newer (SD) Macbook Pros with SATA 1.5g, perhaps trying the Apple supplied SSD in the 1.5g MBP and clean installing OSX would show whether this is software or firmware. Yes/No?
     
  23. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    May 7, 2008
    #23
    Lol that was funny. Thanks for posting.
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    designgeek

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Location:
    "Town"
    #24
    Booooooooooooo.:mad: I was planning on upgrading to an SSD, now I think I'll keep my late 8 MBP.
     
  25. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Location:
    Texas
    #25
    I was wondering that as well. The AnandTech review of the new MacBook Pros showed an improve battery life that they believed couldn't be completely explained by the bigger battery. It seems unlikely that the slower interface could improve battery life, but I have no idea.

    I do hope that Apple fixes this because some SSDs can max out SATA 1.5.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page