13-Inch Retina MacBook Pro Shows Up in Benchmarks

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 10, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Amid continued rumors that Apple intends to release a 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro in the coming months, a Geekbench 2 benchmark submitted late last month as a "MacBookPro10,2" appears to represent the machine in question.

    In comparison, the new non-Retina 13-inch MacBook Pro carries the model identifier "MacBookPro9,2", while the 15-inch non-Retina model is "MacBookPro9,1" and the corresponding Retina model is "MacBookPro10,1".

    [​IMG]


    While the machine name of MacBookPro10,2 on the new entry could be faked, other information included in the Geekbench result is consistent with what would be expected on the new machine. The machine is listed as running a 2.9 GHz Intel Core i7-3520M processor, which is offered in the high-end model of the non-Retina 13-inch MacBook Pro. The machine is also listed as running Build 12A2056 of OS X Mountain Lion, with the four-digit build number suffix frequently being used on Apple's custom operating system builds.

    In addition, the motherboard identifier of AFD8A9D944EA4843 previously surfaced as a new machine in early builds of OS X Mountain Lion. While many of the other new motherboard identifiers found in Mountain Lion were accounted for with Apple's MacBook Pro and MacBook Air models released last month, the identity of AFD8A9D944EA4843 has remained unknown. Finally, the machine's score of 7806 is on par with results seen for the non-Retina model running the same processor.

    One inconsistency, however, is the listing of just 4 GB of RAM on the Geekbench result. The 2.9 GHz Core i7 processor is paired with 8 GB of RAM even on the non-Retina 13-inch MacBook Pro, although prototype machines could have different configurations.

    Back in May, similar Geekbench benchmarks for what turned out to be the non-Retina 15-inch MacBook Pro, as well as a revamped iMac, surfaced in the results browser. The revamped iMac has, however, yet to see a public launch.

    (Thanks, Matthew!)

    Article Link: 13-Inch Retina MacBook Pro Shows Up in Benchmarks
     
  2. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Location:
    Bremen, Germany
  3. macrumors 68020

    pgiguere1

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    #3
    Maybe the i7 processor will be on the base model along with 4GB of RAM, that way there's a significant speed difference with the MBA. Hopefully the second model could have a quad-core :cool:, but I doubt it.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    RoelJuun

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Location:
    Netherlands
    #4
    There are going to be a lot of pissed off people that just bought the 13" MBP ;)
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    #5
    Would it be that much more powerful than the high end MBA?
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    Hawaii
    #6
    Dual Core and only 4gb of memory (probably taps out at 8gb)
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #7
    it shouldn't be. the 13" is the bigger seller. in the past, there has been speculation that apple purposely waits on updating the 13" solely to drive up sales of the 15". i guess they could have waited a little longer but just because we're seeing benchmarks doesn't mean a release is eminent...just look at the imac benchmarks.
     
  8. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
  9. macrumors G5

    jav6454

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Location:
    1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
    #9
    If the 13" brings a discrete gpu, I will be left in quite a debacle. I love the 13", but I don't want Intel's crap graphics.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2012
    #10
    Any predictions on when this will be released? Thinking about buying a 13" MacBook Air, but if this will be released soon, I'd rather wait. Need a new computer for college this fall.
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2012
    #11
    Enough with the laptops already. How about a new iMac Apple?
     
  12. macrumors regular

    mygoldens

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2005
    #12
    BRING IT ON!!

    I would like a 13 retina! Maybe even in matte finish! :D
     
  13. macrumors P6

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #13
    Wasn't there another benchmark for the 15" MBP that had a base 4GB while the shipping product had 8GB ?

    It could be Apple is testing these with one stick of RAM in them.
     
  14. macrumors regular

    iScott428

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2011
    Location:
    Orlando, FL
    #14
    Assuming Apple keeps the same pricing model as the 15", $1499 for the base price rMBP 13" is well a decent price IMO. Not sure if 4gb of DDR will cut it though.:apple:
     
  15. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2012
    #15
    I strongly believe September is going to be a month that a lot of things are released from Apple. If any of you have noticed (most likely anyone with Apple stock), Apple has been releasing things lately in the last 2-3 weeks of each fiscal quarter. This makes a ton of sense because all of the intial huge lump of sales will fill that fiscal quarter with revenue, while the quarter including the next three months collects all of the sales as the new product planes out as far as sales. I find it highly unlikely that Cook will wait until after the end of this quaurter (July/Aug/Sept) to relase things like the new macbook, new iMac, iPhone 5, etc. The 3rd calendar quarter earnings would take a severe drop and Cook knows better than to let that happen.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Location:
    Italy
    #16
    Did somebody actually buy the 13" Pro at this refresh? It was underwhelming to say the least.
    (Written as a 13" Pro owner)
     
  17. macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
    #17
    I did
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    #18
    The identifier was found in earlier builds of ML, it's the one at the bottom of the list here - http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1386254

    Note only iGPU, no dedicated graphics card just as the rumours say.

    Apple obviously believes the Intel 4000 can support the retina display just fine, the 15 inch retina pro is running on only the Intel 4000 most of the time. Graphic intensive applications won't run great but the 13 inch has never been for that.
     
  19. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    #19
    I'd be happy if Apple just put the 13" Air screen in the 13" Pro. And I think driving a Retina Display might be asking too much of the HD4000 graphics.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    hobo.hopkins

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2008
    #20
    I can't wait! Hopefully the graphics of the computer will be able to handle that screen resolution.
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2010
    #21
    I'd much rather have a Haswell retina MBA 13'. If Apple decide to release a retina MBP 13', I'm afraid they will deliberately cripple some core features in the MBA 13''. IMO MPA 13'' is a brilliant form factor, and when the next generation Intel IGP/CPU is released it will be a (even more) very capable machine.
     
  22. macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
    #22
    why? it can power external monitors and the built in just fine
     
  23. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2012
    #23
    I would still get the 13" MBA if it had a dedicated graphics card since it is cheaper, lighter, and powerful enough for most tasks. For people that need a good graphics card for some gaming and more power, retina MBP is the way to go. :/
     
  24. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2012
    #24
    the price difference will probably quench the rage.
     
  25. macrumors 68030

    Krazy Bill

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2011
    #25
    You're going to think, "Bring it on!" when that squirrely 256gb SSD ain't big enough and you can't go inside to upgrade it. Not to mention the RAM that will be soldered on the motherboard. :(

    Getting closer to the end of an era folks... RIP.
     

Share This Page