16GB 5G iPod Touch

Discussion in 'iPod touch' started by ezekielrage_99, May 30, 2013.

  1. macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #1
  2. siurpeeman, May 30, 2013
    Last edited: May 30, 2013

    macrumors 603

    siurpeeman

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Location:
    the OC
    #2
    back front, silver back (no color options), no rear camera. i still think the 32 gb is a better buy. for those on a serious budget, i'd look for used options out there.

    or, for $20 more, buy refurbished.
     
  3. AboutThisMac, May 30, 2013
    Last edited: May 30, 2013

    macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Location:
    London UK
    #3
    I remember Kuo said this would happen, never believed him :p
     
  4. macrumors 603

    siurpeeman

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2006
    Location:
    the OC
    #4
    i think he predicted a cheaper ipad mini, not an iPod touch.
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    MacReloaded

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Location:
    Canada
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2013
    Location:
    London UK
    #6
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Location:
    Lancashire, England
    #7
    Now well that model with 32GB and you've got a sale! I don't want the silly camera, loop etc.

    I just want an iPod touch to play music and occasionally use an app. I generally only buy iPod Touch's because they allow me to wifi sync.
     
  8. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Location:
    The Amalgamated States of Central North America
    #8
    Interesting timing . . .

    I wonder if it could be that iOS 7 won't support the 4th generation iPod and they don't want to announce an OS that won't run on hardware currently being sold as new.
     
  9. macrumors 603

    cambookpro

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #9
    I thought that as well - sounds a fairly likely explanation.
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    #10
    what the hell, they can still add the camera with that price.
     
  11. macrumors 601

    Icaras

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    California, United States
    #11
    I find it funny that it's taking this long for Mac Rumors to report this on the front page.
     
  12. macrumors 603

    rgarjr

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Location:
    Los Angeles Area
    #12
    Black face/silver back is indeed interesting. But yeah it's weird they stripped away the rear cam.
     
  13. macrumors 6502

    YanniDepp

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    #13
    So, this means that all the iPod touch models now have a 4" screen, which is good.

    It will be interesting to see what happens with the iPhone. Will Apple continue to offer the iPhone 4 and 4S, or will they be replaced by this rumoured "low-cost" model with a 4" screen and similar internals to the iPod touch 5G?
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Location:
    ma.
    #14
    I agree
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    cobbyco

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2012
    Location:
    UK
    #15
    Interesting how the mic is at the top of the iPod, where most of the cases will be blocking it...

    [​IMG]
     
  16. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 25, 2013
    Location:
    Arkansas, United States
    #16
    similar to ipad mic placement
     
  17. thread starter macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #17
    After seeing no rear camera or colour option the 32GB touch is far more compelling, though I do have the feeling we'll see a 6G iPod Touch this year and if so I'll be grabbing a 64GB or 128GB model :cool:
     
  18. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    #18

    This is weak from Apple - an inexpensive 16GB iPod Touch would have filled a really big need for kids (and their parents), but taking out the camera makes it pretty lame in my opinion.

    Really don't understand what's going on at Apple these days...
     
  19. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2013
    #19
    They just released it today may 30. It's like the 5g but like someone said it has no back camera and is in black with a silver color on the back. It also has a front camera. $225 or something ( USD)
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    #20
    come to think of it.

    Touch 5 16G are for those already have smartphone with good built in camera. Those who wants to play game but unwilling to pay iphone 5 price or ipod touch 5 price. Those who feel that they dont need another camera might settle for a less expensive version.

    I doubt apple aim this one for parents to buy for their kids because kids nowaday love camera. Judging from the color option, it is more for young adult or even people already working.
     
  21. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
    #21
    If the 4g iPod has a camera why doesn't this have it this is lame
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2012
    #22
    4g camera is useless, 0.7mp is as equal as no camera. It perform poorly in low light. Only good thing is that it can capture 720 video which still not very good. 5g low cost have front 1.2mp capture 720 video as well. I think this is made mainly for video call or for couples to take cute pic without having to ask someone else to take it for them.
     
  23. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2013
  24. macrumors 65816

    KeepCalmPeople

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2012
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area, California
    #24
    The bottom line is that Apple has de-contented the device to maintain profit margins and frankly I think they've really limited the market for it as a result.
    It's not a gaming machine or media playback device as it is only 16GB.
    It's not for kids because kids love to take pictures and shoot video, and not just of themselves.
    It's not for people who already own a smartphone, because those people likely have all the iPod touch functionality on their smartphone.
    Who is it for again? Couples? The blind? Really?
     
  25. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Location:
    Lancashire, England
    #25
    Why would anyone buy an iPod for the camera (primarily). I'm sure world-wide the percentage of people who do so is tiny!

    For me 16GB is only aimed at those light users who don't have a big library, or only want to put a fraction there for the gym/walks etc.

    I'd love this new iPod in a 32GB or 64GB (as long as it keeps up internal wise) and I don't need cameras. I've got an iPhone 5 to do all that but I don't want my music on there wasting battery or space on the phone. I'm fairly sure I'm not the only one either!
     

Share This Page