1960s Braun Products Hold the Secrets to Apple's Future

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jan 23, 2008.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors 6502a

    mac 2005

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #2
    I think the visual similarity, in a number of occasions, is quite striking. Rather than being confused or confessing a poverty of imagination, I'm reminded of the time-honored saying: What's old is new again.
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Location:
    Spokane, WA
    #3
    Yeah, i understand that some of the old designs look very similar to designs Apple has now or have had in the recent past. But still, to believe that Braun's past designs are influencing Apple's current product designs is an insult to Ive's intelligence.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Belly-laughs

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2003
    Location:
    location location
    #4
    Why? You don´t think contemporary high-flyers in the world of design take inspiration from the old masters? That they are uninspired by the past?

    Many product designers hold Dieter Ram as one of the best. The notion of Ive working by (parts of) his principles in design is totally believable.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    skyrider007

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Location:
    Bangkok
    #5
    Ive is a copy cat! :p Just kidding, I'm sure he's "influenced" by Braun's design.
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    #6
    Q: Why does a Russian Mig fighter look like a US F15?
    A: Because there are only so many shapes that will work for any given product, and swept wings with dual engines and dual rudders provide the best function for a fighter.

    The iMac is a computer. A speaker is a speaker. Comparing their shapes as design is disingenuous. Design is form and function.
     
  7. macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #7
    Interesting, but I think the real similarity is not in superficial comparisons, but in their design philosophy, a philosophy shared by many modern designers.
     

Share This Page