1st Gen Intel Powerbooks could have instant boot-up!

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by nylon, Oct 18, 2005.

  1. nylon macrumors 6502a

    nylon

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    #1
    According to PC World (http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,123053,00.asp)
    Intel has performed a live demonstration (on its Centrino Platform) of its "Robson" technology which uses NAND memory to allow for instant boot up of OS's as well as significantly quicker launch times of apps while at the same time conserving on battery life.

    The technology is mature and it is up to PC vendors to begin a roll out. According to PC World, Pro notebook models are likely to see this first.

    This is going to be one long year until Intel Powerbooks come out.
     
  2. katie ta achoo macrumors G3

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    #2
    Oooo, that's pretty nifty.

    But does that mean we won't hear the "booooooongggggg" start up noise anymore?

    I love that noise... :(

    and party killing thought:
    Just because it exists doesn't mean Apple'll use it.
     
  3. mduser63 macrumors 68040

    mduser63

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #3
    Macs sleep so well that I really don't care that they take a minute or two to boot up, as I never shut mine down.
     
  4. nylon thread starter macrumors 6502a

    nylon

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    #4
    I think Apple's (cancelled) investment with Samsung on it's NAND memory factory could partly have had something to do with this.

    Putting an entire OS on NAND memory and only using a hard drive for user files etc. would seriously conserve on the power front since most people user their machines for general day to day email and internet. It would also leed to less heat production and slimmer notebooks.

    I'd love to see that kind of innovation in a new notebook.
     
  5. cr2sh macrumors 68030

    cr2sh

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Location:
    downtown
    #5
    Hmm.

    Kinda makes a big deal out of nothing.. several seconds... seriously.. seconds?
     
  6. Josh396 macrumors 65816

    Josh396

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Location:
    Peoria/Chicago, IL
    #6
    Yeah I don't really need this feature for boot up. It would be nice to have apps open quicker but I don't need that either.
     
  7. nylon thread starter macrumors 6502a

    nylon

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    #7
    I find it quite amusing....... if this was an Apple innovation, we would never hear the end of how great it is to be able to boot OSX instantly. I guess those of us who are a little more rational at evaluating tech news unrelated to Apple will have to come to terms with the fact that this is a die-hard mac-fan site. One just has to marvel at Apple's Marketing department to be able to create such a hardcore fan base. However, I think it is a little ignorant to think that booting instantly vs. taking 30 to 60 seconds is not a major improvement.
     
  8. XNine macrumors 68040

    XNine

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
    #8

    It's a great improvement! Hell, I'll take faster loading apps and booting, it makes sense. I wonder if this same technology would effect the way photoshop (or other pro apps) use filters and the like?

    Hmmmmm.
     
  9. Josh396 macrumors 65816

    Josh396

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2004
    Location:
    Peoria/Chicago, IL
    #9
    You're computer takes 60 seconds to boot? :eek:
     
  10. Dagless macrumors Core

    Dagless

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Location:
    Fighting to stay in the EU
    #10
    ooo thats nifty. i like that. i very much like that.

    good new technology like this i like, but making silly new ports with barely any speed increases is stupid. finally some progress in the computer world!
     
  11. patrick0brien macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #11
    -kkapoor

    Instead of lifting your nose at we poor 'irrational' Mac users, perhaps you should ask yourself first why there are many die-hard Mac fans?

    The, marketing department as you claim, had little do do with the fanbase. However, persons using language like you've done, does conversely have a lot to do with the creation of the fan base - persons with common interests defending themselves from those with a need to ridicule them.

    As for innovation, yes, it is possible that Apple doesn't innovate everything ;) - but then, that's not the point of this thread. Comparing NAND-stored OS vs. others for bootup time isn't either. Please take care in trying turn this into a topic it is not.
     
  12. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #12
    I don't care about booting up, either, although this is good news for when I install a new Tiger update.
     
  13. Dr. Dastardly macrumors 65816

    Dr. Dastardly

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    Location:
    I live in a giant bucket!
    #13
    7 SECONDS COME ON!!

    I NEED TO BE ON WORLD OF WARCRAFT IN 3 SECONDS!! :mad: :mad: :mad:
     
  14. rosalindavenue macrumors 6502a

    rosalindavenue

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    #14
    Amen. Apple laptops take 2-3 seconds to wake from sleep, with all apps running. XP laptops take at least 30 seconds to wake from sleep, and you'd better have closed the apps before you put it to sleep, because they'll crash when you wake it up-- particularly web browsers. This is a feature that will be a real move forward for windows, but no big deal for mac users.
     
  15. rosalindavenue macrumors 6502a

    rosalindavenue

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2003
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    #15
    "One" also has to marvel at "one" just now coming to terms that this is a die hard mac site. Are you Paul Thurott? :eek:
     
  16. Jay42 macrumors 65816

    Jay42

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    #16
    Meh, I'll definitely take it rather than leave it, but this would be much more impressive on a PC rather than the Mac. As others have said, most don't really reboot their Macs much. Frankly, even if sleep is not that much faster than shutdown in the intel PB's, at least you still have all your apps running and your work just as you had left it when you put it to sleep.
     
  17. Whyren macrumors 6502a

    Whyren

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Location:
    east of the West and west of the East
    #17
    They haven't updated that noise in a while...maybe they'll use the "Intel Inside" jingle. *shudder*
     
  18. dubbz macrumors 68020

    dubbz

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2003
    Location:
    Alta, Norway
    #18
    Or maybe they'll just speed it up a bit.

    Or they could have Steve say "Welcome to OS X" or whatever, and then speed it up instead! Think about how funny that would sound.

    *cough* So, anyway...
     
  19. cebritt macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #19
    Nothing new!

    My old PowerBook 100 made in 1991 could boot from a RAM disk! That was the only PB that had that feature and I don't know why it was ever dropped...
     
  20. Aarow macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    #20
    I HATE that noise. It's almost as bad as windows little startup jingle!
     
  21. applemacdude macrumors 68040

    applemacdude

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2001
    Location:
    Over The Rainbow
    #21

    Because it was slow... very fscking slow
     
  22. screensaver400 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2005
    #22
    I'd like to see more technical details about this. I remember hearing about something that sounded kind of like this years ago... MRAM, Maybe? I can't remember exactly. John C. Dvorak thought it would be big, haha.
     
  23. QuarterSwede macrumors G3

    QuarterSwede

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2005
    Location:
    Colorado Springs, CO
    #23
    I think it was MRAM (Magnetic RAM) which is still slow. Too bad they can't speed it up because it requires no power to maintain it's state, ie. no more sleep mode or booting EVER.
     
  24. fartheststar macrumors 6502a

    fartheststar

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2003
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #24
    My crap windows PC (2.4 ghz Pentium4) at work takes over 2 minutes. And then I have to wait a few minutes before Outlook can respond.

    My G4 1.25 GHZ DP MDD takes less than a minute.
     
  25. cr2sh macrumors 68030

    cr2sh

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Location:
    downtown
    #25
    Did you even read the article?

    The gains you speak of (30 to 60 seconds) isn't mentioned at all.

    I find it amusing that you define "innovation" in 5 second chunks.. but then you are more rational.

    :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page