2.0ghz macbook worth extra $$?

Discussion in 'Buying Tips and Advice' started by mrweirdo, Jun 17, 2006.

  1. mrweirdo macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    #1
    Just wondering what people on here though. Is it worth it to go for the 2.0 ghz white macbook for the superdrive and upped cpu speed instead of the 1.83ghz? are there any differences in battery life between the two?
     
  2. gloss macrumors 601

    gloss

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Location:
    around/about
    #2
    I think the battery life is pretty close.

    In hindsight, I probably would have been content with the 1.83ghz model. I got the Superdrive model just. in. case., but of course that never matters. The base model is the best deal, easily. You don't lose anything but the Superdrive and a wee bit of processor speed, which you won't notice unless you're doing a lot of heavy work.
     
  3. chris y. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Location:
    los angeles, ca
    #3
    I just went through this same decision yesterday. I couldnt tell a difference between the speeds, but I think resale value down the road would be better with the higher ghz and superdrive. I previously had a powerbook g4 with the superdrive and I burned a total of 0 dvds. I found myself just transferring files to my PC desktop to backup files.

    If you can spare the extra ~150 then I think why not, but I used that money to get more RAM.

    I think battery life should be similar Ive only gone through one cycle so far on mine but it seems to be over 3 hrs and 30 min with lowered brightness on the 1.83 macbook.
     
  4. daze macrumors 6502

    daze

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    San Jose, California
    #4
    I think if you can afford it, the Black is worth it. It definitely feels and looks nicer, but that is a subjective matter. I just ordered one, and am waiting for it to receive.
     
  5. mrweirdo thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    #5
    I'm leaning towards going with the superdrive one just because I plan on keeping this new comp for awhile(who knows cds are so small in data size they may become usless within the next year or so) along with it becoming my main system and I dont actualy have any other computers that burn dvds after my liteon burner in my desktop died. Whenever I want to burn one I have to borrow my sisters comp for a few minutes heh.

    unfortionently black is probably just outside my price range athough white will look beter on my desk anyways and it matches my floorlamp even :D
     
  6. celebrian23 macrumors 65816

    celebrian23

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2006
    Location:
    Under the sun
    #6
    Do you or don't you need a superdrive? That is pretty much the only difference with the speed bump being so small I'd seriously doubt if you noticed it
     
  7. alexstein macrumors 6502a

    alexstein

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    #7
    The 1.83Ghz Machine is a nice machine. However if you really need a superdrive to burn dvd's on the fly you should consider the 2.0 Model.

    I did the same think a couple of years ago with my iBook I opted for the combo drive and I was pretty upset down the road that I did not go for the superdrive.

    I would say spend the extra dough upfront and get the Model with the superdrive.
     
  8. gloss macrumors 601

    gloss

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Location:
    around/about
    #8
    I thought about this, but then I realized that the Superdrive on the MB is single layer, and if you're truly interested in burning DVDs you might as well use the extra money and purchase a nice dual-layer external drive.
     
  9. daze macrumors 6502

    daze

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    San Jose, California
    #9
    External DVD burners are quite cheap. So even with the lowest end MacBook isn't a bad decision, but getting one with the superdrive is probably the better idea. The price difference isn't so huge, $200 US.
     
  10. w8ing4intelmacs macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Location:
    East Coast, US
    #10
    worth it? lol.

    if you don't really burn dvds (or have a different machine with a dvd writer), then the base model is fine (the difference between 1.83 and 2.0 is marginal and probably not noticeable in everyday tasks). also consider that in the next 2-3 years that hd-dvd (or blu-ray) drives will become standard, so it doesn't really matter what kind of drive you have now.
     
  11. daze macrumors 6502

    daze

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    San Jose, California
    #11
    I agree. I had bought a PB 12" 3 years ago without a SuperDrive, and I too regretted it down the road, but hooking up an external drive wasn't so bad. Of course, you can't lug it around, but then again, how many times will you need to burn DVD-Rs on the go?
     
  12. daze macrumors 6502

    daze

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Location:
    San Jose, California
    #12
    In the next 10 years, something else will replace Blu-Ray, so that won't matter either. Not exactly a good line of thinking. Look at what you need right now, not what it will be replaced 2-3 years down the line. IMO.
     
  13. QCassidy352 macrumors G3

    QCassidy352

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #13
    I got the 2 ghz model... I think that it will resell better, and even though the base model would have been fine, I was spoiling myself. :)
     
  14. mrweirdo thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    #14
    LOL I hate decissions still cant decide and now lolygaging on ordering heh

    I dont like the fact that the superdrive doesnt have dual layer support athough I have a 100 pack of ritek dvd-rs still waiting to be used before i buy more. also I need to buy a 56k modem(mostly for when visiting granys only dialup there unless there is a open wireless in the neighboorhood i leech off of to browse the net ;) ) plus Im gona get a mini dvi to dvi adapter. So mayby i will just get the base model. Athough I do like the sound of being able to brag to my friends at college that I got the 2.0ghz with superdrive when i go back to school :D
     
  15. coffey7 macrumors 6502a

    coffey7

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    #15
    I agree about the resell value and you do get a little better speed. It is noticeable.Go with the white 2.0.
     
  16. Mitthrawnuruodo Moderator emeritus

    Mitthrawnuruodo

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Location:
    Bergen, Norway
    #16
    I didn't really need the superdrive, as I prefer to use my external LaCie drive anyway, and I think the difference from 1.83 to 2.0 GHz is totally unnoticeable for most tasks.

    That said, I just had to get the white 2.0 version out of pure psychological (or psychopathic) reasons, I just had to have all those specs to read 2 (;)):
     

    Attached Files:

  17. xfiftyfour macrumors 68030

    xfiftyfour

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    #17
    i always go for the highest option i can afford. my reasoning? 1, i'm a complete nerd and like knowing i have the latest and greatest. 2, i like knowing my specs won't be completely blown to crap three weeks after my purchase. 3, so that the computer lasts me longer before i start complaining about it lagging or being sluggish. and 4, for the resell. you figure, down the road you'll be selling it to upgrade, so you want to be able to offer the person buying it from you the best specs you can, so that you get more of your money back.
     
  18. Moe macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2003
    #18
    I ordered the white 2.0 as well. Although I'd rather have a faster dual-layer Superdrive, I have that in two other computers and rarely burn dual-layer because of the expense of the media. OTOH, I hardly use CDs at all any more, and it seems to me that iBooks with only Combo drives don't sell nearly as quickly as those with Superdrives.

    I'm at or below 1GB of memory use much of the time on the Mini so I decided not to go the 2GB aftermarket memory route to offset the 2.0 price some. Since Apple's 1GB wasn't much if any more than a pair of 512MB aftermarket sticks, I went with Apple.

    A 60GB HD would normally be plenty in a notebook for me, but I may have to be assimilated and install Windows on it, so I sprung for the $45 upgrade to 80GB.

    I use a notebook outdoors in the sun and so didn't want a black solar collector. I hear MacBooks run hot enough without help. So I went with the white, which I like better anyway.
     
  19. w8ing4intelmacs macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Location:
    East Coast, US
    #19
    Hint to the newbie: You should read the post before replying to it.

    I prefaced the comment with "If you don't really burn DVDs". It's not really worth paying $200 for the ability to burn DVDs if you're not going to use it. For $200, you can buy more an external DVD writer or more RAM, or a larger hard drive, or wireless mouse and keyboard, or an iPod ...

    I mentioned HD-DVD because many people buy the DVD writer to "future proof" their machine. Unfortunately, the next generation of media is starting to make its way down to the consumer. So paying $200 isn't going to future proof squat.

    Of course, $200 for a super drive isn't that much if you're willing to pay $150 for a color :p
     
  20. w8ing4intelmacs macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Location:
    East Coast, US
    #20
    Will it resell for more? Yes, because you spent more.

    Will it resell for $200 more? I don't think so.
     
  21. mrweirdo thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2005
    #21
    You know I could see down the road if apple keeps the curent form factor and starts using a bluray or hd-dvd cabable drive U might see a lot of people with older macbooks moding there systems by replacing the optical drives that is assuming the new drives of the future will fit in curent case. I seem to recall this happening with the superdrive for awhile with the ibook. Hell I might even do it myself being the hardware geek I am if it becomes posible that is of course after warrenty is up then i got nothing to lose by posibly voiding the warrenty but I expect that its a couple years down the road anyways before we start seing such hd cabable drives showing up.
     
  22. Bern macrumors 68000

    Bern

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Location:
    Australia
    #22
    Go the 2Ghz White, you'll kick yourself later if you don't. The past two books I bought were only combo drives and each time afterwards I kicked myself for not getting the superdrive.

    Ok so it's not dual layer... but it's not a combo drive either.
     
  23. w8ing4intelmacs macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2006
    Location:
    East Coast, US
    #23
    Actually, the sd on a macbook is dual layer
     
  24. gloss macrumors 601

    gloss

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Location:
    around/about
    #24
    Actually, no it isn't.
     
  25. Timepass macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2005
    #25

    Resale value is higher but what gets me is how much value a lot of people put in the resale value of there computers who have no intention of ever selling it. I sorry but to put any value in something like that when you have no plans to ever sell it....
    So before you ever put value in that is how long am I going to need it or will I ever sell it? if you are going to run it as long as possible before selling it the resale will pretty much be the same accross the board. Very poor. differnce of maybe 20 -30 bucks andI mean MAYBE. So it shouldnt matter.

    Sorry rant on people saying resale value of blah blah is great. If you dont plan on or never will then WHY DO YOU CARE.
     

Share This Page