2.8 ghz > 3/3.2 ghz in Compressor?!

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by Reach, Feb 6, 2008.

  1. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    Norway
    #1
  2. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2002
    Location:
    New York
    #2
    I'd like to know also. Both machines had 2GB of RAM so there is no reason why the results would come out that way. But if it's true, I'm happy since I'm getting it mainly for compressor and I can save $1600 in the process.
     
  3. thread starter macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    Norway
    #3
    I know, but it was the only thing I could think of. I know After Effects suggests 2gb ram pr core ie, so we could possibly see some strange effects of very little RAM on multi-core utilizing tasks..? Finishes qicker and has to write to RAM more.. hehe Just trying to make some sense of it.
     

Share This Page