20 inch vs 24 inch iMac

Discussion in 'iMac' started by Roy Hobbs, Dec 27, 2006.

  1. Roy Hobbs macrumors 68000

    Roy Hobbs

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #1
    Besides the obvious screen size and the video card are there any other differences in the 20 and 24 inch iMacs??

    A friend of mine wants to buy an iMac (after Macworld) but is having a hard time deciding between the two.

    $500 seems like a lot for 4 inches of screen and a different video card. She is going to be using the Mac for Photoshop, Aperture and some light video work using Final Cut Express.

    Is the 24 worth the extra $$ for her?? Any suggestions?
     
  2. NotFound macrumors 6502a

    NotFound

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    #2
    If she is aware of the physical and technical differences between the two then she is the only who can say whether it is or is not worth the extra money.
     
  3. polevault139 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2006
    Location:
    Illinois
    #3
    I think the only reason for the 24" is the real estate.
     
  4. Roy Hobbs thread starter macrumors 68000

    Roy Hobbs

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #4
    The physical differences are obvious. Neither of us are extrememly technical especially in regards to video cards. My questions are basically is there any thing else different between the 2 models that I am not seeing??? Is the 20 inch iMac's video card sufficient for the task listed in the original post?
     
  5. Danksi macrumors 68000

    Danksi

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Location:
    Nelson, BC. Canada
    #5
    Since she'll be using applications that can benefit from an external 'scratch' drive and certainly additional storage capacity - she may benefit from the FW800 port, that's available on the iMac 24-inch, but not the 20-inch.
     
  6. Spinnetti macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Location:
    Kentucky
    #6
    You really know the answer already I think...
    The changes aren't enough to warrant the 24" unless you want the real estate.

    I have a maxxed out 20" (optional video card and 2 gig of memory) and plan to get the 24. Why? because of the real estate and video card! Especially for photo work, I think bigger is better, but budget and physical size may play a factor.

    I am reasonably tech savvy, and neither of the imac video cards is anything special, but for the intended usage, they don't need to be anyway.
    For photo and video work, lots of memory and a fast hard drive are much more important.

    Why not look for a used or refurb 24"? best of both worlds if you can accept a bit of risk from that route.
     
  7. adk macrumors 68000

    adk

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2005
    Location:
    Stuck in the middle with you
    #7
    In all honesty all you're getting for the extra money is an extra 4" and 540,000 pixels. That said, those extra pixels are worth every penny to a lot of people. If your friend is using a small monitor now the step up to a 20" display may be satisfactory for her. If she's already using a 20" it may make more sense to step up. I guess the only way for her to really know would be to go to an apple store and try them both out. Also, the refurb shop usually has them for $1,699 which takes some of the sting out of the price.

    EDIT: Your friend could also purchase a 20" imac and an external 20" display for huge amounts of real estate. You can easily get a 20" dell for around $300
     
  8. Roy Hobbs thread starter macrumors 68000

    Roy Hobbs

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #8
    We looked at the refurbs (before they sold out) but they only offer the base model video card.
     
  9. CrackedButter macrumors 68040

    CrackedButter

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Location:
    51st State of America
    #9
    You get more than just four inches, dude.

    You get the extra FW800 port for starters and a larger hard drive plus video card if needed.
     
  10. cbrain macrumors 65816

    cbrain

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2006
    Location:
    North-East, UK
    #10
    Bigger Screen, better graphics card and the 24 inch has 24 watt speakers, whereas the 20 and 17 inch have 12 watt speakers. ;)
     
  11. Roy Hobbs thread starter macrumors 68000

    Roy Hobbs

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #11
    Standard hard drives are the same size 250 gig, and the optional drives are the same as well.

    Looks like its screen, video card, FW800 port and some bigger speakers.
     
  12. zerolight macrumors 6502

    zerolight

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    Location:
    Glasgow
    #12
    I couldn't live without the real estate anymore.
     
  13. joshwest macrumors 65816

    joshwest

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    #13
    I've owned both a 20 incher and now the 24" incher and trust me you can feel the real estate after a while you get use to it but then when you go back to such a smaller screen like my 17" LCD at work its night and day. The Real Esate is a very good selling point. But i opted to spend the rest of the money on the upgrades to the ram, video card, and HD size. But if I was your friend i would save about 800$ and get the refurbished for 1699$
     
  14. hanschien macrumors 6502

    hanschien

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #14
    Don't forget that the 24" is VESA mountable!!
     
  15. Roy Hobbs thread starter macrumors 68000

    Roy Hobbs

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #15
    We are leaning toward the refurb, but I am leary about getting a video card with on 128 mg of RAM.....plus with the refurb you only get the 250 gig HDD
     
  16. mkrishnan Moderator emeritus

    mkrishnan

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    #16
    Whether or not she ends up getting the 24", and whether or not FW800 is necessary, especially if Aperture is coming into play, pairing a big internal hard drive with a second big drive externally is probably going to be really important... does her budget include a second drive, or is she planning to get that later on an as-needed basis?
     
  17. Roy Hobbs thread starter macrumors 68000

    Roy Hobbs

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #17
    She has plenty of external HDD space....her former setup had a 250 gig that was backed up to 2 seperate external drives each night with SuperDuper and she had an additional 200 gig drive that was used for Scratch

    FW800 isnt a deciding factor she has nothing that utilizes that connection.

    The ideal setup would be a larger internal drive (500 gig) backing up to 2 external drives nightly and then a scratch drive. But that really doesnt help with her decision.
     

Share This Page