Only 2 doors, and virtually no back seat.
Not practical for me, and a lot of others, I would warrant.
Only 2 doors, and virtually no back seat.
Not practical for me, and a lot of others, I would warrant.
Don't get too comfy with the gas prices. They're expected to go back to $3.50 by summer of '09.Were do you come up with 70 mpg? Meanwhile the big 3 U.S. automakers have nothing to compete in this segment. But it must be said here in South carolina gas is going for $1.45 - $1.55 a gallon! Yeah baby Yeah! My next car will be a Challenger with 25 mpg.
I think it's better looking than the Prius. But it's still a weird back end. I'm not sure what it is about high MPG vehicles that make them all like that.
maybe cuz when you're in the city, you accelerate/decelerate more. When you're on the highway, you're maintaining a certain speed.It's interesting that the city MPG is lower than the highway. Isn't is usually the reverse on hybrids?
HAHAHAHAHA it has a 73HP engine. Awww
maybe cuz when you're in the city, you accelerate/decelerate more. When you're on the highway, you're maintaining a certain speed.
Aerodynamics?
That's how the prius works. When you are driving below 25 (or 15... i forgot which) you run on battery and not gas.that is true for non hybrids. hybrids should be better for the stop and go traffic since they're designed (from what i know) to run off of the battery at lower speeds rather than relying on gasoline.
But it's not just the shape - it's the way the glass is used, and so on. I just can't believe it's *all* aerodynamically related. Perhaps it is, though.
That's how the prius works. When you are driving below 25 (or 15... i forgot which) you run on battery and not gas.
Maybe Honda came up with a better system? Maybe that's why it gets significantly better MPG than the Prius.yes. so why would honda not do the same??
Yes.I thought the article said the original insight approached 70mpg on a smaller platform than the new Insight.
Its important to remember that the first Insight was designed with a simple but revolutionary goal in mind: push the mpg limits of a subcompact 2-seater as far as possible, and it did. To this day, its the most fuel-efficient mass-produced hybrid ever. This was accomplished with fundamentally similar technology to the new Insight, but with a smaller platform. Almost universally speaking, smaller cars are lighter, and less weight equates to better fuel efficiency.
I thought the article said the original insight approached 70mpg on a smaller platform than the new Insight.
yes. so why would honda not do the same??