2016 MacBook Review Roundup: SSD Performance is Much Improved, Lack of Ports and 480p Camera Are Still Negatives

[MacRumors]

When Apple announced a refreshed 12-inch Retina MacBook last week, it provided several publications with review units to get a look at the changes in the new machine. We've gathered up a range of these reviews below to highlight the general release reaction to the new 2016 MacBook.

The MacBook is identical in design to the 2015 MacBook, but it includes a faster SSD, improved Skylake processor with better graphics, longer battery life, and a new Rose Gold color option. Many of the reviews focus on these improvements while also calling out missing features that many were hoping for, including an increased number of USB-C ports, Thunderbolt 3, and an improved FaceTime camera.

Engadget's Dana Wollman says Apple's claim of 25 percent better graphics performance and extra battery life "are indeed accurate." With the SSD in the 1.2GHz 512GB machine, Wollman saw read/write speeds of 947MB/s and 845MB/s, respectively, significantly improved over the 738.2 and 451.7MB/s speeds of the year-ago model.

In everyday use, I had no problem juggling all my usual apps: Slack, Spotify, TextEdit, Photos, Notes, Messages, Maps and Chrome, with nine pinned tabs and a handful of unpinned ones. Apps were quick to launch, and I thankfully didn't notice any of the hiccups that sometimes plague slower machines; it kept up as I hopped between pinned browser tabs, for instance, which not all laptops do. [...]

How similar is the updated MacBook to last year's model? Put it this way: I was strongly tempted to assign it the exact same score. In the end, I decided it deserved a slightly higher number as a way of acknowledging the extra hour of battery life and considerably faster disk speeds.

Ars Technica's Andrew Cunningham said the 2016 update isn't going to please people who disliked the 2015 MacBook given its single USB-C port. Those who held off from purchasing the 2015 MacBook might be interested in the 2016 model given its speed improvements, though, and with the SSD, encrypted performance is much improved. Ars Technica has a wide range of benchmarks that are worth checking out.

If you've already got a 2015 MacBook, this one is usually faster but won't run circles around it. Its CPU, GPU, and storage performance is in the neighborhood of a MacBook Air from two or three years ago. This new release is a solid upgrade for anyone with a Mac from, say, 2010 or earlier, but it's not a high-powered workstation.

If you thought you wanted a MacBook but didn't buy one because you were worried about the speed, the new model's GPU and storage in particular are improved enough that they might tip the scales.

Laptop Mag's Mark Spoonauer says the 2016 12-inch MacBook "better than its predecessor" but "still involves compromises." He highlights the improvements in the 2016 MacBook but notes that Apple didn't fix its biggest shortcomings - port availability and low-res FaceTime camera.

The 2016 MacBook is certainly an improvement over its predecessor. It's significantly faster, especially if you opt for the Core m5 model, and it lasts an hour longer on a charge, all while being extremely portable. I also continue to love the Retina display and don't really mind the flat butterfly keyboard. However, for this kind of money, I would really like to plug in a power cable and a second device sans a dongle, and I believe anything in this price range should be able to power two external monitors.

The Verge's Dieter Bohn said the new MacBook feels about 25 percent faster. He also covers the new "vibrant" Rose Gold color, which can look "either kind of bronze or incredibly pink."

Geekbench 3 pegs the speed improvements on raw processor operations at around 20 percent, but disk-write speeds using Blackmagic saw bigger improvements, as much as 80 or 90 percent faster (reading speeds look like smaller, incremental improvements). Overall, the thing feels about 25 percent faster to me. [...]

My hunch is that if you were worried that the last MacBook was too underpowered for you, the new MacBook will only assuage your concerns by, well, 25 percent or so.

Additional Reviews: CNET's Dan Ackerman, Mashable's Christina Warren, and TIME's Lisa Eadicicco.

Apple is selling the new Retina MacBook on its website, with prices that start at $1,299. Orders placed today will be delivered in approximately a week, but many retail stores around the world have the machines in stock for immediate purchase.

Article Link: 2016 MacBook Review Roundup: SSD Performance is Much Improved, Lack of Ports and 480p Camera Are Still Negatives

 

[1applerules1]

I can't even remember the last time I opened my camera on my MacBook Pro. I like how everyone complains about it even though most of the complainers can't afford it anyways.

 

[aaronhead14]

Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!

 

[Barry Bishop]

Better off with the XPS 13in.

 

[StudyFlo]

The A9X blows those Intel chips away (at least in this benchmark). It's just a matter of time until we'll find those ARM-chips in our MacBooks.

And yeah, I know that the software is made for x64 and its not that easy to convert everything to run on ARM. But Apple never had easy tasks to sollte (but still did)!

 

[crsh1976]

I just can't wait for the "omg the iPad's A9 is so fast, Apple is ready to drop Intel and move its Macs to ARM!!" comments.

Edit: Missed! That was fast.

 

[Crosscreek]

I get the minimalist thing but 2 ports is required IMHO.

 

[jayducharme]

The A9X blows those Intel chips away. It's just a matter of time until weil find those ARM-chips in our MacBooks.

I was shocked that the iPad Pro bested all those laptops. On those terms, yes it's a laptop replacement. It's just held back by the current limitations of iOS.

 

[gsmornot]

Install OSX on the iPad Pro or move the processor over to the Macbook its a beast looking at this list.

 

[goobot]

The A9X blows those Intel chips away (at least in this benchmark). It's just a matter of time until we'll find those ARM-chips in our MacBooks.

And yeah, I know that the software is made for x64 and its not that easy to convert everything to run on ARM. But Apple never had easy tasks to sollte (but still did)!

The OS of the iPad doesn't tax the processor the same. Running a Mac with an A9 processor would yield worse results.

 

[Blizzardman]

Why are people constantly complaining about this laptop as if Apple got rid of the Air and Pro and this was the only option? Get the other machines if you need ports or performance and quit whining.

 

[StudyFlo]

I just can't wait for the "omg the iPad's A9 is so fast, Apple is ready to drop Intel and move its Macs to ARM!!" comments.

Edit: Missed! That was fast.

if it was that easy... but yeah, they should definitely do that some day.

 

[Mac 128]

I get the minimalist thing but 2 ports is required IMHO.

Wait until September after the remove the 3.5mm jack from the iPhone. They will release an updated rMB with the 3.5mm jack replaced by a Lightning 2 connector.

 

[keysofanxiety]

Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!

It's an early ultraportable fanless laptop. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't buy or recommend it either. But when the MacBook Air was first released, it cost $1000 extra just for a 64GB SSD; an SSD which had read/write speeds barely hitting 100MB/s.

Think of it more as a concept that will be honed and improved with multiple iterations. The MacBook Air was originally a massively overpriced, insanely underpowered laptop, which prioritised weight and thinness above all other aspects. Time will tell to see if Apple finally 'crack' the balance of power/price/ports in the rMB.

 

[StudyFlo]

Wait until September after the remove the 3.5mm jack from the iPhone. They will release an updated rMB with the 3.5mm jack replaced by a Lightning 2 connector.

I guess not. That 3,5 jack in the mac has an optical port integrated, which is not included in the iPhone, so there's a difference hier.

 

[cambookpro]

Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!

The weight and size of these machines is incredible and is the main reason people will pay a premium for it. If you're trying to compare spec sheets, this definitely isn't targeted at you and it's missing the point of the product.

If this could connect to my Thunderbolt Display, I'd buy one in a heartbeat. OS X on a laptop barely bigger than an iPad? Yes, please.

 

[OSX7]

Why are people constantly complaining about this laptop as if Apple got rid of the Air and Pro and this was the only option? Get the other machines if you need ports or performance and quit whining.

Because it fills a void caused by their meaningless existence.

 

[Mac 128]

I guess not. That 3,5 jack in the mac has an optical port integrated, which is not included in the iPhone, so there's a difference hier.

Not in the rMB. Check your specs. It is exact same support as the iPhone. The MB Pros are the only portables that include a digital I/O.

If Apple drops the 3.5mm headphone jack from the iPhone, I would expect that in addition to replacing it on the rMB, they will add it to all Macs. When they add it to the MB Pro, they may keep the 3.5mm jack, but likely will eliminate the digital I/O at that time and make it analogue only like the rMB & Air are now.

 

[wozmatic]

Apple, you're slippin

Hurry up and release a MacBook Pro already.

Do you not want our money or....

 

[macduke]

When I see something like this compared to the often remarkable YoY improvements seen in iOS hardware, it makes me worry that the Mac is slowly dying off. For the price this thing just doesn't have the lifespan. It can't even beat the much cheaper iPad Pro on raw performance, lol. But it can do more—for now.

 

[CJozef]

One port is not a problem. If its for you, then the product is not for you. But the 480p camera, ... I would like to know the reason why ... must be something

 

[KPOM]

The increase in the SSD speed is nice. That's the bottleneck for many operations now, so might be the most noticeable improvement.

For those complaining, I'm guessing that Apple will release an updated rMBP in June at WWDC with Skylake and TB3.
[doublepost=1461605149][/doublepost]

When I see something like this compared to the often remarkable YoY improvements seen in iOS hardware, it makes me worry that the Mac is slowly dying off. For the price this thing just doesn't have the lifespan. It can't even beat the much cheaper iPad Pro on raw performance, lol. But it can do more—for now.

It's what happen when Apple is dependent upon Intel. The Core-M is in general faster than the A9 (the benchmarks are skewed by factors such as iOS vs. OS X vs. Windows), but throttles much more quickly. If Apple had kept the MacBook Air 11.6" size and weight, they could have squeezed in the 15W Skylake-U chips that HP and Dell are using, but I'm guessing that they have grander designs (i.e. 28W Skylake-U) for the upcoming revision to the rMBP. So this is really their only option if they want a thin, fanless design in an x86/x64-compatible Mac.

 

[brownpaw]

Still can't figure out why anyone would by this crap. If you're spending this much on a laptop, get a MacBook Pro. One port is unacceptable!

I see a market for it, I just don't see a $1200 market for it. This needs to start at $899 max, maybe even $799.

 

[LordVic]

Why are people constantly complaining about this laptop as if Apple got rid of the Air and Pro and this was the only option? Get the other machines if you need ports or performance and quit whining.

The bulk of the gripe comes because most users were looking for an enhancement to the existing Air lineup, not another product that cuts corners.

I would argue most people who want "thin and light" laptops are probably more than satisfied with the MBA's size and weight. In fact, as I've stated countless times, the difference in size between the 11" MBA and the 12" rMB is almost non existent. we're talking about a couple MM's here and there, and the weight of a roll of quarters difference. What we were looking forward to was an upgrade to the MBA to fix the one thing that is horrible about it. The display, which hasn't been updated in 5 years and is arguably one of the worst displays avialable on a $1000+ level laptop.

But instead of giving us the MBA's with retina option. The MBA's went untouched and a new, very compromised, and much MUCH more expensive laptop fills that spot. a Laptop that sacrifices everything the MBA had going for it, in favour of "thin".

So now from Apple laptops we have a weird choice.
Thin and Light with good display? You go rMB, but you get 1 port, a heavily throttled CPU, compromised typing experience, 480p webcam and a $1549 price tag (CAD)
Thin and light with semi powerful internals? You go MacBook Air. You get back two USB-A ports, magsafe and thunderbolt (with 13" also getting SD card). But you're stuck with a really low end TN display, with horrible colours and a lot of light bleed and wash out.
POwerful internals with all the things: Get a rMBP. you sacrifice the "thin and light" that the two others offer, But you get all the ports and more, the best power Apple can offre in a laptop and the high res display. But confusing matters against the lower two options, the 13" rMBP comes in at the same price at the rMB.

The rMB just did nothing but add confusion to the product lineup, that was historically, very straight forward. But now, we have this product sitting dab smack in the middle, that nobody was really looking for.

Thats why there's so many people going "WTF apple?"

 

[Mr Fusion]

One port is not a problem. If its for you, then the product is not for you. But the 480p camera, ... I would like to know the reason why ... must be something

It's called greed.

Err... Wait, it's called "maximizing shareholder returns."

I've been saying it for a while now, Apple is the new General Motors. They could fix EVERYTHING that people gripe about in their machines (including the MacBook) TODAY if they wanted to...

... But they're out of ideas. So they'll spit it out piece by piece, year after year to keep you buying.

This isn't a company that loves its customers, it's a company that has its balls out and middle fingers up to them, practically daring them to buy their half-baked products.