28-Inch '4K' Display from Dell Priced at $699, Launches January 23

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 8, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Last month, Dell announced several new "4K" displays for its lineup, including a teaser for an upcoming 28-inch model to be priced at "under $1000". While the pricing range was considered a breakthrough at the time, several other display manufacturers announced their own offerings at CES this week with pricing in the $800 range.

    [​IMG]
    But as highlighted by Forbes, Dell has now revealed that its display will be launching on January 23 with an even lower price of $699.
    Plunging prices for 4K/Ultra HD displays come just as Apple has launched its new Mac Pro, with its dual graphics cards capable of supporting up to three such displays simultaneously. The latest version of Apple's Retina MacBook Pro is also capable of driving a 4K display, taking advantage of the new Thunderbolt 2 standard to handle the throughput.

    Many had hoped that Apple would release its own 4K/Ultra HD display alongside the Mac Pro, but the company did not do so, instead offering Mac Pro and MacBook Pro customers the option of adding on a $3600 32-inch Sharp Ultra HD display.

    Article Link: 28-Inch '4K' Display from Dell Priced at $699, Launches January 23
     
  2. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    #2
    Well, that's.... cheap.
     
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2012
    #3
    A trio of these costs less than the Dell 32"! OMG!
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    Grimace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Location:
    with Hamburglar.
    #4
    Looks like 3 of these will be on their way to my door!
     
  5. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    #5
    One thing I've not managed to establish with any degree of certainty; will the Late 2013 iMac be able to drive one (or two?) of these 4K displays? Don't know if it's relevant, but I went for the 4GB VRAM option.
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Arkious

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Location:
    Newcastle, UK
    #6
    Yes please!
     
  7. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    #7
    iMac can't drive any of them since you need Thunderbolt 2 to drive those.
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Rudy69

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2009
    #8
    Come on Apple, with this monitor I don't think I'll be able to wait long for an updated Cinema Display
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2012
    Location:
    Frankfurt am Main
    #9
    I just wonder how my mid 2011 MBA would handle such a cuty :confused:
     
  10. macrumors 68040

    eastercat

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Location:
    PDX
    #10
    Originally, I was going to buy a flat screen tv so I could connect it to my computer and watch movies. This is making me reconsider that plan.
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    #11
    Its still only a 28" display and currently movies won't take advantage of the increase in resolution anyway as most all are 1080 so for watching movies you still may wanna just buy a bigger hd tv set
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Corrode

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2008
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    #12
    Makes me rethink the 27" iMac I'll be purchasing today but knowing Apple, a retina iMac is still probably a ways off and will be more expensive when it's released.
     
  13. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    #13
    the late 2013 imac wont drive one of these?
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    KdParker

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    #14
    Well here is to the beginning of a pricing war. (hopefully).

    Unless these monitors are plauged with issues.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    jayducharme

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Location:
    The thick of it
    #15
    Now that 4k monitors are becoming more affordable, I assume they'll soon be obsolete. Samsung just announced an 8k TV, so that will become the new "pro" standard (until a 32k TV is announced in a year or so :rolleyes:).

    My current 1080p monitor looks incredibly clear to me. It seems like manufacturers are pushing these higher resolutions just to sell more products at higher prices. At some point, is the human eye going to be able to see that much of a difference in the image quality? I'd prefer that manufacturers work on better color accuracy and quicker response time.
     
  16. macrumors 604

    clayj

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    visiting from downstream
    #16
    Now Apple needs to re-release a 30" ACD with 4K resolution. $999 is the magic price point.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    crackbookpro

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Location:
    Om nom nom nom
    #17
    Sharp pioneers the industry, but I will take a look at these Dell 28" 4K's.

    And, as someone else mentioned... Most 4K sets won't mean much till other markets catch up.

    Like the price, but hesitant for now.
     
  18. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Location:
    Ontario
    #18
    Been in the market for a new display. wasn't even thinking 4K yet, but if Dell's 4k display is going to be $699 and is in their IPS lineup (ultra displays), i might just hold off and buy one of those instead of one of their current models
     
  19. macrumors 68030

    MrXiro

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #19
    Will the current gen 2012 Mac Mini be able to drive this? HD4000 integrated gpu...

    I want one!
     
  20. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    #20
    Amazing to see it drop below their 1440p 27" :D
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Location:
    Lincoln, UK
    #21
    My old white 24" 1920x1200 (i.e. slightly more pixels that 1080p) iMac is very pixellated. Perhaps because I'm used to a retina iPhone and iPad. I have just got a 15" retina MBP, and am interested in this new monitor to complete my desktop replacement. However…

    The original story says:

    But the 15" rMBP tech specs on the Apple website put the limit much lower:

    It only mentions 4K via HDMI at 30Hz, which is too low. I'm hoping the 4K via Thunderbolt is possible. Can anyone confirm that?
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    BMcCoy

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2010
    #22
    I've used Dell's monitors with my PC setup for years, and always been happy.. currently the U2410 is my primary display, thanks to the high colour accuracy.

    I'm yet to see what a 4k screen will do for me, but will watch closely this develop...
     
  23. macrumors 68000

    RoastingPig

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Location:
    SoCal
    #23
    holy schnikes! and i almost bought one of there u2713hm for 600 bucks...gonna get this joint Fur-Sure
     
  24. macrumors 68040

    eastercat

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2008
    Location:
    PDX
    #24
    I was only planning on buying a 32" set anyway, so it wouldn't have been that much smaller.
    It's true the 1080p wouldn't take full advantage of the resolution, but I figured 4K would display it to its best advantage. Additionally, it'd make a great monitor.

    Still, I'd want to wait for reviews and info on Mac compatibility.
     
  25. macrumors 604

    Digital Skunk

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Location:
    In my imagination
    #25
    Really nice addition to a new Mac Pro if I say so myself.
     

Share This Page