7 image hand held HDR

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by georgemann, Jan 29, 2010.

  1. macrumors regular

    georgemann

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington & Siem Reap, Cambodia
    #1
  2. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Location:
    Hamburg, Germany
    #2

    Its too much, I don't like HDR's that do not look "real" anymore :rolleyes:

    check this HDR out:

    [​IMG]
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    OrangeCuse44

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    #3
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    Sdashiki

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Location:
    Behind the lens
    #4
    HDR should add something to your photo, not become your photo.

    This attempt does nothing but make the image less understandable.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    #5
    I'm going to be harsher because I want people to be able to tell me the truth about my work too. Your image is HORRIBLE. I hope you have the original files. I bet the 0EV image, with maybe a little bit of tweaking in Photoshop, is a really cool picture. I love the scene. But seriously, your HDR picture is terrible and the perfect example of everything wrong with HDR.

    Yes, I said it... Please take it constructively and don't be offended.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    NathanCH

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Location:
    Stockholm, Sweden
    #6
    I agree. But then why did you post a "surreal" HDR right below that? :p
     
  7. macrumors 601

    Phrasikleia

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Location:
    Over there------->
    #7
    I think the novelty of cartoonish HDR effects wore off on most people years ago. If you're going to push things that far, it's best to have an image that seems conceptually in sync with the technique. I've seen some edgy urban images that have worked well with it--graffiti, neon signs, Times Square madness--that kind of thing. Otherwise, HDR seems to work best if it's used merely to gain more dynamic range in high-contrast scenes inconspicuously.
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    OrangeCuse44

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    #8
    I agree, which is why I used it for this shot below. Granted, this was/is my first attempt at the technique and I'm not saying it's even that good, but a beach scene like this at 0EV just won't look great through the camera's eye. You will lose detail due to the very bright sun and heavy shadows. I tried finding a happy medium between the two.
    [​IMG]
     
  9. thread starter macrumors regular

    georgemann

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington & Siem Reap, Cambodia
    #9
    Interesting comments, thank you, I am not offended at all. Oddly enough though, I am much closer to representing the "real" colors of that scene, at that moment, then any of you seem to realize. The HDR adjustments are actually fairly conservative and the colors are more of a combination of the time of day, weather condition (light breaking through clouds after a brief rain storm) and the unique color of the red dirt, stones and lichen on the walls at that location.

    George
     
  10. AllieNeko, Jan 29, 2010
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2011

    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2003
    #10
    George Mann, would you be willing to email me your 0 EV exposure? I'd just like to play with just that (even if it's a JPEG) in Photoshop and send it back to you and see which YOU prefer.
     
  11. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2007
    #11
    As much as I love HDR, i think there's a good time for surreal vivid effects and a bad time, you don't really want to take away from the picture but add to it.

    A good non-surreal image
    [​IMG]

    A little surreal imagery
    [​IMG]

    But everybody has their preferences.
     
  12. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    #12
    Make it surreal through content, not post-process.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    wheezy

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2005
    Location:
    Alpine, UT
    #13
    I think the biggest problem in over-surreal HDR shots is the lack of any kind of solid focal point, there simply just isn't enough contrast, or the contrast is spaced over everything and you just don't know where to look. Here's my best HDR to date, 3 shots tripod.

    [​IMG]
     
  14. thread starter macrumors regular

    georgemann

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington & Siem Reap, Cambodia
    #14
    Markie, I find all the comments interesting, but no thank you, I do not wish to see my images manipulated by someone else. I would love to see the same scene interpreted by someone else though (with their own photography).

    George
     
  15. macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #15
    It has it's place and it's neat all in itself but mind the comments above, HDR should add to and not take away.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    bzollinger

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    #16
    This is a little too harsh I think. It's not like the OP asked for you to rip on his photo? Or did I miss something.

    I think with some tweaking in PhotoMatix this could be a pretty sweet HDR. Yep, I still think it could be a good photo as an HDR.

    I'm a little skeptical of the "hand held" part though, not that it can't be done, but it sure is tough. You'd need some real fast shutter speeds and a real steady hand, especially when you change your AEB. Or can your Nikon capture 7 frames with one AEB series??
     
  17. macrumors 6502a

    bzollinger

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    #17
    I really like the flower picture! Nice job really good use of the effect!
     
  18. thread starter macrumors regular

    georgemann

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Location:
    Seattle, Washington & Siem Reap, Cambodia
    #18
    Thanks, but I don't mind the harsh criticism at all, it usually indicates that there is some interest and is much more welcome then apathy.

    Tweaking for better results I can not argue with, the image still has a ways to go before I would hang it on a wall.

    This is part of a handheld HDR series and yes the images are captured in one 7 shot AEB series (Nikon D300). Motion in these images is of course unavoidable so I am working on incorporating the motion (a sense of time, etc.) into the images.

    http://nikondp.com/2010/01/hdr-cambodia-angkor-thom/

    Please continue with the critiques and don't hold back the punches.

    George
     
  19. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    #19
    IGNORE CAN'T READ, thought you said d3000 ! haha
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    NeGRit0

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Location:
    Las Vegas, Nv
    #20
    Odd, cause that image looks cartoony, and somewhat animated. Plus there is a great amount of haloing around the edges of the trees. I doubt that was present when you were shooting...
     

Share This Page