A Firefox for music?

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Dec 22, 2005.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors 603

    SiliconAddict

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #2
    Though inflammatory he does have a point. The difference being that iTunes doesn’t suck. :p
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    Seasought

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    #3
    Sort of. One can export an iTune's file to AAC then convert that AAC file to MP3 format using Jhym, a free piece of software.

    Not surprising given the comparable market share with regard to both OS X and Windows and the fact that Windows comes with Windows Media Player and OS X with iTunes.

    How easy will this be? Saying that it will allow changes by devloper's doesn't really open up such a nice feature to the general public - in which case, if you're only catering to other developers, what's the outcry about this great new piece of software with regard to the rest of the world at large? I'm thinking it won't be that difficult to modify and if such is the case it will be a neat player to use.
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #4
    Not to sure if I would be keen to back something like this (assuming that I had a spare few hundred million in a Swiss bank account :rolleyes: )Unless of course they struck up an exclusive deal with a top hardware manufacturer where by the browser was bundled with the hardware. I am not saying that the concept wont work, coming from Mozilla source code I am sure it will. It just needs to be able to generate revenue and be profiable through the licencing and sale of downloading music to be successful. I think a 'wait and see' approach on this one is best.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    Seasought

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    #5
    It sort of makes sense. As popular as the browser has been they have the reputation that will help push it out there and get people trying it (both devs and regular users). It could make for some really interesting players in terms of customization, look/themes and the like.

    It is quite a ways away from fruition however.
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    Silencio

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    NYC
    #6
    Apple has a huge lead on the software side of the equation. The integration between iPod, iTunes, and iTMS sets the bar pretty high for the competition to attempt to match, but so far they haven't even come close.

    While I don't see Apple resting on their laurels, I do want to see some good competition out there in jukebox software and actual hardware. A monopoly in any market isn't a good thing, even if it is Apple who holds it.

    Although Songbird is still a pretty vague concept, I don't think they're quite on the right track if the main thing they're talking about now is the ease of skinning it. If they develop it so it's very customizable and extensible through skins or plug-ins, someone will still have to hit on the right combination of features and connectivity to tempt more users away from iTunes, Winamp, or WMP.

    I'll have to see what else Rob has to say next time we cross paths. :D
     
  7. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #7
    Sounds an excellent idea.

    There is no reason why there can't be good iPod integration ( it is only a portal hard disc ) and people have already been able to add to the iPod music library, so thats not a problem.

    Of course, the added bonus is that this could also work with other MP3 players ( and other devices such as cell phones ).


    If this reaches the standards of Mozilla then it'll be one cracking piece of software.
     
  8. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #8
    I'll try any media player just for kicks. If it's any good I'll keep it. I just hope it's available for the Mac, unlike WinAmp.
     
  9. macrumors 68040

    mduser63

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #9
    Mac and Linux versions of the user preview are supposed to be available a couple weeks after the Windows version.
     
  10. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #10
    Nice, I'll have to figure out what to do with my Protected AAC's then if I like it that much. I can never get JHymn to work. It never authorizes.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    Fender2112

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2002
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    #11
    I think we should keep an eye on this one. I think it has real potential. Especially if it can be expanded to include video as well.
     
  12. macrumors 68030

    Platform

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
  13. macrumors 6502a

    Fender2112

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2002
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    #13
    You have to wonder why they are so blatantly copying iTunes UI. Perhaps there is more here than meets the eye. I'm thinking iTunes 7 or 8. Perhaps Apple is a silent partner.

    Just a thought.
     
  14. macrumors 68030

    Platform

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2004
    #14
    Not a bad one either :cool:
     

Share This Page