Accounting Rule Change May Affect Apple's Future Earnings Reports

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Sep 14, 2009.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    Silicon Alley Insider reports that a change to accounting standards that received preliminary approval last week may alter the way Apple treats revenue from the iPhone and Apple TV. The issue relates to Apple's policy of recognizing revenue from the iPhone and Apple TV over a two-year period from the date of purchase, a policy developed to satisfy accounting regulations as Apple provides free feature additions and software updates to the devices beyond the initial purchase.

    Consequently, Apple has instituted a policy of releasing two sets of earnings numbers each quarter, one official set using Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) that parcels out iPhone and Apple TV revenue, and one set of non-GAAP numbers that includes all revenue as recorded on the date of purchase. For example, at its most recent quarterly earnings announcement, Apple reported official GAAP earnings of $1.23 billion on $8.34 billion in revenue, while the company's non-GAAP earnings came in at $1.94 billion on $9.74 billion in revenue.

    The Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued preliminary approval of a policy change that would allow Apple to officially recognize most of the revenue from iPhone and Apple TV sales at the time of purchase, setting aside only a small portion of the revenue deemed to be the value of future software upgrades for future recognition.
    The report notes that the rule change would affect only future sales, meaning that as Apple transitions to the new standard, its earnings would be somewhat inflated as the company recognized full revenue from new iPhone and Apple TV sales while still recording deferred revenue from sales in previous quarters made under the old standard.

    Article Link: Accounting Rule Change May Affect Apple's Future Earnings Reports
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    applesith

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    #2
    wow. why even bother with GAAP anymore?
     
  3. macrumors 68030

    Full of Win

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2007
    Location:
    Ask Apple
    #3
    Basically a "6 will get you half a dozen" situation
     
  4. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    #4
    Unsophisticated is the word.

    This accounting bias has been stated from day 1 and has been thoroughly explained by Apple. Both GAAP and non-GAAP numbers where available at every earning reports.

    There is not a single modification in Apple or its earning here : there is just a modification in the order it will present its numbers (GAAP/nonGAAP becomes nonGAAP/GAAP).

    If your investor is trying to sell you "suddently over-performing Apple stocks", you shouldn't trust him anymore and place your savings elsewhere.
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2002
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #5
    I'm not sure what your issue with US GAAP is, but there is a pretty big purpose for it... comparability, understandability, reliability, relevance.

    This would be a good thing for Apple. They get so show more revenue up front rather than having to recognize it over a 2 year period.

    Surprising that FASB is going the less conservative route here but I think it does reflect Apple's operations more accurately.
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2008
    Location:
    UK
    #6
    It just made me smile to see accounting principles being front page news. :)

    I didn't imagine there are too many who visit this site who'd care...
     
  7. macrumors 68040

    Bubba Satori

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Location:
    B'ham
    #7
    Well, there's no computer news.
     
  8. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    #8
    Woot! Now iPhone owners will have to pay for OS updates too.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    phineas

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2006
    Location:
    South of the Border I-95
    #9
    Think again, torrent downloads, hacked versions , the way the economy is going and now more money. NOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    DipDog3

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2002
    #10
    They said they would set aside a small amount of the sale for upgrades, but that may mean that there would be limited upgrades in the future that would be free.
     
  11. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    #11
    then watch us non-fanboy iphone owners either bail for another phone or not upgrade

    over the last decade in the cell phone/PDA market there was a new cool device every 2-3 years. In each case the company didn't continue to develop it and lost market share to the next cool thing.

    Android seems too be maturing very nicely and even Microsoft may have finally learned their lesson, but Android probably has them beat on cost to build a device
     
  12. macrumors 68020

    Beric

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #12
    Well, I learned this in Spring in my Intro to Business class. Interesting to see it in real life.
     
  13. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    #13
    It still bothers me they do not consider the ipod Touch a revenue generating device.

    If they do not charge Apple TV users for updates, then they should not for Touch users based on this article. It is in Apple's best interest of revenue that OS upgrades for the Touch be free. Imagine if people did not upgrade from OS 1.0 to 2.0 for the App store, tons of revenue would of been lost from people that were not buying apps, which they have currently sold 2.2 billion. Imagine how that number might have been effected if they did not charge 9.95 for that update.

    On top of that, we can now buy music, tv shows and movies on the Touch. And now that they market it as a gaming system means more game sales. And Apple gets 30% of every game sale, massive revenue generator.

    Too bad they did not consider this when re-evauluating their Accounting Practices.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    kresh

    #14
    Translation --> "When we make this change we feel that we can confuse a significant amount of investors, tricking them into passing us money hand over fist."

    Why do the words "money grubbing" come to mind?
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    applesith

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    #15
    I know GAAP and why it is important...economics & finance major. I am just very surprised that Apple will be allowed to recognize all of the revenue at time of sale....goes against GAAP. I was being sarcastic with my original post.
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2004
    #16
    ---------
    You should be registered posting at an MS site-dontcha think?
    if they GET it-then so should you
    Like MS paying people to edit WIKI to make Linux look like a poor choice
    (they will never "Get it"-a bunch of way past Boomer stage old farts or groomed young corporate WOW! GEE! poodles)
    Just so you know
    MS is increasing irrellevant in the 21st century
     
  17. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Location:
    Austin - Live Music Capital of the World!
    #17
    There is an error in the report...specifically:

    When a change is made in an accounting treatment, the change MUST be reflected in ALL financial reports released from the company. Otherwise, we would not be able to truly compare different periods together - it would be comparing apples to oranges (pun intended). This is BASIC accounting, guys.

    And from the modification in FASB, it looks like the actual reporting will be a hybrid of the two values Apple shows currently, since the non-GAAP revenue amounts they quote are recognizing 100% of the retail sales of iPhones and AppleTVs.

    At least this will keep the Finance Department in Cupertino busy.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2008
    #18
    only makes sense seeing as how the iphone no longer has revenue sharing
     
  19. Guest

    Surely

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #19
    It doesn't say anything about that.

    This is about how accountants will recognize revenues. I don't think that this is a plan by Apple (or the FASB) to start charging for iPhone OS upgrades 2 years from now.

    Not all of the revenue at the time of sale, just more of it (most of it, according to the OP). That would still follow GAAP.


    /Bah, the GAAP we all know today will be quite different in the coming years what with the convergence of GAAP and iGAAP. It will be interesting to see what this bastard child will look like......
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 6, 2009
    #20
    Well the more accurate the reports, the better for everyone
     
  21. macrumors regular

    akacaj

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Location:
    NY
    #21
    First they change how they report drive space in Snow Leopard and now they change how they report their earnings... what is going on with Apple these days?
     
  22. Guest

    Surely

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #22
    This is not the result of a decision made by Apple. This required accounting change would be in response to a rule change made by the FASB.

    Apple would simply be responding to the change in rules.
     
  23. macrumors regular

    Constable Odo

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2008
    #23
    Great. When I wake up one morning I guess I can expect to see the price of Apple shares double. Victory dance.

    I'm not holding my breath on this one. Maybe Apple should just sell more desktop computers and investors will actually think Apple is worth investing in. Maybe Apple should raise the $.99 price point of applications to around $5 and start making some money from the App Store. :D
     
  24. macrumors P6

    twoodcc

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Location:
    Right side of wrong
    #24
    so the stock price will probably go up then i guess
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    crackbookpro

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2009
    Location:
    Om nom nom nom
    #25
    ..good point ;)
     

Share This Page