Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended - Coming Soon

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 7, 2007.

  1. macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001

    Adobe announced that their spring release of Adobe Photoshop CS3 will bring a new "Extended" edition aimed at 3D and video professionals. Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended will include all the features of the standard version, but also incorporate several new features:

    Mac customers, in particular, have been waiting for Adobe Photoshop CS3 as it represents the first version of Photoshop that will run natively (at full speed) on Apple's Intel Macs. A beta version of CS3 has been available since December.

    Adobe is offering a FAQ (pdf) about the new Extended edition. No pricing announcements have been made yet, but the release has been reported to be on March 27th at a special event in New York.
  2. macrumors 65816


    Dec 11, 2002
    Location: Location:
    As discussed elsewhere in related ythreads, many pro users have been waiting for this -- and other pro software -- to run natively on the Intel based Mac's. It is great news that the wait is now over -- and I am hoping Apple comes out with new pro machines in the not too distant future.

    I remember seeing stats somewhere from a survey of pro users as to when they would shift to the Intel based Mac Pro's. I can't remember the exact results (and can't find the survey anywhere) but a majority of users said they were waiting for Photoshop and other software to be native. But if there is no news of new Mac Pro's how long will people hold out even after the release of key pro software?

    I know I am waiting for the next gen Intel Mac Pro's to replace my G5 tower -- but I am not a pro user -- I just want a new machine!

    I hope Apple and Adobe have been working together around the release (and shipping) dates so that those of us waiting can have all new stuff to play with
  3. macrumors 601


    Jan 13, 2002
    Pro Machines

    All the pieces are beginning to come together.......;)
  4. macrumors 68020


    Jun 29, 2004
    So is this a photoshop with a dumbed-down after effects built-in?
  5. macrumors 6502


    Feb 22, 2005
    Philadelphia & Northern California
    I'm going to China in June. I should pick up a copy of CS3. It's only 10RMB, $1.50 or so.
  6. macrumors regular

    Nov 2, 2004
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Do yourself a favor and buy 100 and sell em on eBay. (or through PM's Here!)

    Just kidding...of course.
  7. macrumors 6502


    Feb 22, 2005
    Philadelphia & Northern California

    Yeah... Good idea. $50.00 each. I will buy 50,000 copies. So, I can make $2,500,000.00 I'm going to be the next Bill Gates in 5 years.
  8. macrumors regular


    Dec 18, 2004
    I live in Shanghai.

    "A Friend" bought CS2 several months ago for 30 RMB (abt $4). I have, er my friend has, trouble finding mac SW for much less than that, but maybe you have a "source"?

    By the way, my "friend" also told me that the version of CS2 he got was about 2x slower than it should have been. When he checked the "version" number of the build, he found out it was some kind of debug build. So, he thinks what you get on the street for $3-4 isn't always so great! He's since gone back to using his properly purchased CS version, and is eagerly awaiting downloading a properly legal version of CS3.

    On the other hand, my "friend" also has a copy of aperture which he got for free from an authorized apple dealer (tai ping yang shu ma guang chang ping guo dian nao shang dian - they were unwilling to sell it to him because it would take x weeks to arrive, and so would only give him a copy - it's the chinese model, pay for hardware - never EVER pay for media of any kind - legal versions of stuff aren't even AVAILABLE in most stores - hard to come by). If it was available for purchase online, he would have bought it, but it's not. Anyway, he's had no problems with that.
  9. macrumors 65816


    May 1, 2006
    Edit: self-censorship. I don't want to be known as a pirate (which I'm not now I earn my own living, gone are the student years) on a forum I like so much.

  10. macrumors 6502


    Feb 22, 2005
    Philadelphia & Northern California
    30 RMB? that's expensive. Go to Guang Zhou. It's around 10 - 15 RMB ($1.5 - $2).
  11. macrumors 6502


    Feb 22, 2005
    Philadelphia & Northern California
    by the way, it's in English... Not in Chinese.
  12. macrumors 68040

    Jan 10, 2005
    Is this the "how much did you pay for your pirated software?"-thread?
  13. macrumors 68030

    Analog Kid

    Mar 4, 2003
    Ok, video frame editing in Photoshop, while tedious, makes some amount of sense. What the heck is 3D modeling doing in there? Wouldn't it make more sense as a separate app, or maybe as a part of Illustrator?

    As if the PS interface wasn't confusing enough as it is, now they're adding the capability to model my house? Weird.

    Do we know what the components of CS3 are going to be yet?
  14. macrumors newbie

    Sep 8, 2006
    I don't understand this,

    is the new feature supposed to be video editing software like FC???

    Apple and Adobe wouldn't want to be competitors in this area, right? Shouldn't the new FCP and FCP:Extreme be able to do whatever the new CS3 add-on is?

  15. macrumors member

    Sep 12, 2006

    I would think this would be for scientific applications.

    Also, CS3 "introduced" March 27, released Spring 2007.

  16. macrumors 68030

    Analog Kid

    Mar 4, 2003
    Adobe Premier is their video editing app, and Adobe dropped support for Mac around the time FC came to be. They're now bringing it back to the Mac platform, and yes, they're competing. I'm guessing Adobe thought their customers would switch to Windows and stick with Premier, but it probably didn't work out that way.

    This is another one of those dicey situations where Apple is competing aggressively against one of their major 3rd party developers. So far it all seems good though...
  17. macrumors 6502a

    May 13, 2005
    Sounds like many vista users are gonna get short changed - it won't run on Vista Home Basic or Starter, they will be forced to upgrade if they want Photoshop!

    Why are Adobe doing this? What is missing from these products that make it unable to run on them? So glad there will only ever be 1 version of Mac OS X
  18. ATG
    macrumors regular

    Aug 7, 2005
    Sounds like a mini after effects to me.

    Why not just improve on PS integration with AE? Less work and more valuable because AE will always have more features than this PS "Extended".
  19. Guest


    Jan 22, 2007
  20. macrumors newbie

    Mar 8, 2007
  21. macrumors 601


    Aug 9, 2002
    The real question is why does Microsoft rip off their customers by severely crippling the versions that most people buy?
  22. macrumors 68000


    Jul 9, 2001
    London, UK
    Because they don't really want you to buy those versions, but the more expensive versions instead. They have just run out of new and interesting things to do, so they have moved onto the squeezing as much money out of people stage.
  23. macrumors G5


    Feb 8, 2003
    The Peninsula
    How is this different from the way that Apple cripples the systems that most people buy?

    (No ExpressCard or lighted keyboard on MacBook, few options (e.g. good graphics) for iMac, ...)
  24. macrumors 68040


    Aug 11, 2005
    Behind the lens
    Ok, 3D take.

    I think it will be some sort of Flash 3D thing.

    Where, lets say you have some text, and you want a 3D object behind the text, lit properly to go with the drop shadow or gradient on the text.

    you could render this innumerable ways in a 3D app.


    you could possibly use something like Swift3D and create this object on a Photoshop layer, and be able to rotate/manipulate the object to get it to match the rest of the scene.

    sounds neat, but without more details, one can only speculate.
  25. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Aug 29, 2006
    Washington DC
    Has it really gotten to the point where we have to explain the difference between hardware and software?

    PLEASE tell me that's not what you're really asking us.

Share This Page