AirPort Extreme - no Gigabit Ethernet?? WTF!?

Discussion in 'Event Archives' started by MacVault, Jan 11, 2007.

  1. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #1
    Who's dumba$$ idea was it at Apple to not put Gigabit ethernet ports on the new Airport Extreme? I just can't beleive it! Is it just a typo? Or is slower speed really the "in thing" now days??? WTF?! Apple won't be getting my money for that thing. Man, what a Fvq3d Up MacWorld Keynote. :mad:

    Oh, and the USB hard drive sharing feature is a nice touch but it better not be Apple's solution to the home server need.
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    RichP

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2003
    Location:
    Motor City
    #2
    It has to by a typo, right? If it was not, that means the wired ethernet ports are slower than the wireless connection!
     
  3. macrumors 68020

    sikkinixx

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Location:
    Rocketing through the sky!
    #3
    maybe it is a way of trying to push you into wireless?
     
  4. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Location:
    London
    #4
    The AppleTV wotist doesn't have Gigabit ethernet either. :eek:

    Having said that, Apple is not the only manufacturer to have a router that supports the faster wireless but still only has 10/100 ethernet on it.
     
  5. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #5
    There is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE for this CRAP! What good is Gigabit on the new Macs if the router Apple sells is only 10/100?? WTF! I almost don't beleive it! I'm trying to convince myself it's a type but I know it's not :mad:

    The last 30 years were just the beginning. Welcome to 2007 - where we make products that are 90% awsome and 50% halfA$$-STUPID!
     
  6. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    #6
    What?! Seriously? So they upgrade every mac with gigabit ethernet, but don't support it in their networking equipment.

    Clever!
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    clintob

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2006
    Location:
    New York, NY
    #7
    Whoa people, hang on, hang on...

    1) I agree Gigabit ethernet would be nice, of course. But keep in mind that Gigabit (although included on MacPro's) it's still a VERY sparsely used technology in home networks and the Airport is a home networking device. It's not meant for setting up major networks with Gigabit switches, etc.

    2) The price point of the Airport ($175) is pretty darn low for a multi-port router that also allows printer/hard drive sharing and Pre-N support.

    3) Also, since we're on the subject, we should probably stop dealing in theoreticals. In theory, 802.11n has all kinds of potential but in practice most reviewers and users have reported that its speeds are pretty much in line with what they get out of wired 10/100 networks. So before we jump around screaming that the wired will be slower than the wireless, let's be real. In practice, the two will probably be identical - about 100Mbps.

    No, it's not Gigabit, and I would LOVE that as much as anyone. But one thing at a time...
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    tdhurst

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #8
    Sweet

    Very well put and I agree completely. Nice job.
     
  9. macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #9
    I agree. Consumer product for the home market, although all Macs now have gigabit ether, not just the pros. Also since USB 2.0 maxs out at about 240Mbps it is not much of an inconvenience not having 1G ether.

    Perhaps we will see an APExt Pro later in the year?
     
  10. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #10
    Gigabit ethernet is not only on the MacPro. It's on every Mac Apple makes now - iMac, MacBook, Macbook Pro, MacPro. Now what good is it if I buy the new AirPort Extreme?

    Oh, and as for home networks... with all the video, music, etc being done in the home now days, and as cheap as Gigabit is, there should be nothing less that GIGABIT - Yes, even in home networks!
     
  11. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2005
    Location:
    Birmingham, UK
    #11
    I think you're missing the point here..

    The point is that every mac now comes with gigabit ethernet, but they won't be able to use it unless they buy a third party network switch/hub.

    Also the point of it being able to share a hard drive over the network is let down slightly by the lack of gigabit ethernet.

    And AFAIK it only has three ports, it can't be THAT much more expencive to upgrade them to gigabit ports.
     
  12. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2002
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #12
    Home networks DO need Gigabit!

    I can't beleive some of you guys saying 10/100 is ok for home networks. It just is NOT! Period. Do you think the HP Windows Home Server will have 10/100? NO WAY. It will have Gigabit! Why? Because more and more home users are dealing with huge multi-gigabyte video/movie files, music files, photos, network attached storage, etc.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    tdhurst

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2003
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #13
    I can...

    I can currently stream (via iTunes sharing) a video from my 500mhz iMac, connected via ethernet to a linksys voip router, in turn connected to an Airport Express, which my powerbook connects to wirelessly.

    I really don't see all the issues so many people have predicted.
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    iW00t

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Location:
    Defenders of Apple Guild
    #14
    It is times like this when I will just want to :rolleyes: and give the usual piece on this...

    "We've done extensive studies and found that most consumers do not require this feature."

    They use the same excuse to explain why the iMac is non user upgradeable, why it didn't have a user adjustable height, etc etc... it sure as hell would work here :rolleyes:
     
  15. macrumors 603

    aswitcher

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2003
    Location:
    Canberra OZ
    #15
    Its a bit annoying but I dont see this as a major issue.

    My question is, where is the ethernet version that doesn't need power?

    I actually thought Apple should have put the optical audio out into these new base stations to push up their adoption. I know I will be putting at least one where I would have liked to have audio out as well for speakers.
     
  16. macrumors 65816

    maverick808

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    Scotland
    #16
    More people have gigabit Ethernet than have 802.11n, so are you saying Apple shouldn't be bothering with 802.11n?

    Furthermore, how many people even have Internet connections that reach 802.11g (54mbps) speeds? Hell, most people don't even have Internet connections that match 802.11b (11mbps) speeds. So people aren't buying these things so that their Internet connections are faster. Surely, you buy them to transfer data between machines on the local network? I would imagine a typical Airport Extreme buyer would have maybe one desktop machine and one laptop. They want copying from the desktop to the laptop to be as fast as possible. With a desktop wired to the Airport Extreme such a copy is now going to be half the speed the wireless is capable of AT BEST, because the wired connection has become an unnecessary bottleneck.

    Sorry, but I think that situation is just stupid.
     
  17. macrumors member

    Philoman

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    #17
    I agree with MacVault. Faster networking will benefit everyone. Just because you are a home user, you will only be transferring under 10MBs? And just because you are a home user, you can afford to wait longer time to copy/tranfer. Gigabit networking is very affordable. D-Link DGL-4300 Wireless router with 4 gigabit port sells for less than $135.

    Apple is an innovator and a leader of technology. I was excited to see the new router including the latest 802.11n technology. Then they leave the wired networking to 10/100. They forgot to do some marketing study. Users have wireless and wired networking in their homes and small offices.

    It really is a short coming from Apple from a marketing point of view. Only if they would have included the gigabit port, it would have been a fine product that would satisfy a much wider range of customers. I surely would buy one. I have a gigabit ethernet router that I got 1 year ago. After a year later, I will definitely not go backwards.
     
  18. macrumors 68030

    apfhex

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2006
    Location:
    Northern California
    #18
    Hell yeah, PoE baby. A friend has been waiting to see PoE devices become popular for a while now.

    But indeed, WTF, in reply to the OP. My 5 year old PowerBook has gigabit ethernet. Why in the world would Apple not include it on the new AirPort Extreme?
     
  19. macrumors 68020

    Wild-Bill

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2007
    Location:
    ?
    #19
    It does. I read the specs on pcmag. The HP Home Server will have gigabit, as it should.

    There is no excuse for Apple omitting gigabit ethernet from this router. The first thing I said to myself when I read the specs was "What? No gigabit?!?!" Shame on you Apple!!! SHame!:mad:
     
  20. macrumors 68040

    iW00t

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2006
    Location:
    Defenders of Apple Guild
    #20
    I just placed an order for mine.

    Gigabit ethernet or not it is still cheaper than what I paid 6 months ago for that Netgear piece of **** which reboots every now and then. At least here I know I am getting "Apple quality", for less money, and more features (USB hub print + file share).
     
  21. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2006
    Location:
    New York, New York
    #21
    I can see how no gigabit ethernet port would be a problem for some, but that's why you can buy other (likely more expensive) wireless routers WITH gigabit ethernet ports.

    My dad just ordered an APE earlier this week, and the lack of gigabit ethernet ports won't be a problem for us. Everyone except me runs on a wireless connection, and I have an original Mac mini (which doesn't have gigabit ethernet).
     
  22. macrumors 65816

    maverick808

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    Scotland
    #22
  23. macrumors P6

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
    #23
  24. Administrator emeritus

    xUKHCx

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Location:
    The Kop
  25. macrumors 65816

    maverick808

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2004
    Location:
    Scotland
    #25
    I agree, it does look kind of mad. I doubt you can attach a printer. Maybe you can attach disk drives since the tech specs say...

    Product Features

    Four devices in one: Internet-sharing Router, 4-port Gigabit Switch, speed- and range-enhanced Wireless Access Point, and built-in Media Server

    Storage Link feature lets you easily add gigabytes of storage, while Media Server streams media from an attached storage device to any UPnP compatible media adapter
     

Share This Page