Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Diatribe

macrumors 601
Jan 8, 2004
4,256
44
Back in the motherland
Damn I should've tried more times to get a better price before I bought mine. :D Oh well I only paid $98 but still. This is just weird. I have heard of daily price changes with memory but this is just ridiculous. I wonder what the reason for this is.
 

Abstract

macrumors Penryn
Dec 27, 2002
24,836
848
Location Location Location
So why does it give you a different price each time you press the Reload button? If I use one browser without deleting my cookies, then I should get the same price each time. I'm sure its more complicated than that, but I'm just trying to understand the crazy world I live in. :(
 

Squire

macrumors 68000
Jan 8, 2003
1,563
0
Canada
I assume you guys are talking about the "Most Popular" one highlighted in yellow. I hit reload several times and still got $94.08. Same with the debug option. Pretty crazy, though.

Squire
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
Squire said:
I assume you guys are talking about the "Most Popular" one highlighted in yellow. I hit reload several times and still got $94.08. Same with the debug option. Pretty crazy, though.

Squire

Well, if your browser sticks you with the lowest price no matter what you do, that's not such a bad thing.... ;)
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
ExoticFish said:
man this is the first i've heard of this and i have to say that this is crazy!! there have been some bad ideas in the past few years but this is up near the top of them imo.

I agree. Regardless of how "egalitarian" [link stolen from post above] it might be, it's going to make people hesitant to buy on the internet again. At least, without checking multiple browsers and with/without cookies to see if they're getting the best price.

Pretty soon, we'll be seeing "I found xxx at $xx.xx at this URL - do you see a better price?" posts. Within a few months, there will be more of those posts than "iBook vs PB", "free iPod!", and "I just bought a ___" posts combined. Mark my words....
 

the future

macrumors 68040
Jul 17, 2002
3,435
5,513
Could someone who read about it explain in a few simple words why a company (like in this case Crucial) would do a thing like this? I fail to understand how it benefits them. :confused:
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
the future said:
Could someone who read about it explain in a few simple words why a company (like in this case Crucial) would do a thing like this? I fail to understand how it benefits them. :confused:

They're attempting to determine how to get the most money out of a given customer. In essence, if they can somehow determine that a customer is poor, frugal, etc., they'll list a lower price. If they can determine that a customer is rich, a spendthrift, etc., they'll charge more. The art and science is in how they determine those things. With no cookies, they have very little info other than your browser and what you're trying to buy. With cookies, they know more.

I expect to see more of this in the future, then a backlash, then less, and a cycle of the same going forward.

It's not really unethical. Sales people do this all the time. It isn't wrong - no one's forcing anyone to buy anything. But it can create very bad PR.
 

Chip NoVaMac

macrumors G3
Dec 25, 2003
8,888
31
Northern Virginia
Maybe it is time to look at OWC? Prices and service are up there with Crucial.

OWC's price is $95.99. And guess what they aren't playing pricing games. I checked on IE and got the same price.

I will never buy from Crucial based on this news. It is just wrong.
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
I just realized that this opens up a new market - the trade/sale of cookies that indicate you're poor and frugal!

Now the people that are in the "business" of boosting Google ranks can sell something to consumers.... ;)
 

ooohbeggie

macrumors newbie
Original poster
Jun 16, 2004
13
0
jsw said:
I just realized that this opens up a new market - the trade/sale of cookies that indicate you're poor and frugal!

Now the people that are in the "business" of boosting Google ranks can sell something to consumers.... ;)

:D you know, i'm laughing, but at the same time, that's a scary thought in that it's probably not entirely untrue.

on another note, i sent an email to Crucial's general manager a few minutes ago. hopefully i'll hear something back. i'd love to hear this explanation...
 

Squire

macrumors 68000
Jan 8, 2003
1,563
0
Canada
jsw said:
I just realized that this opens up a new market - the trade/sale of cookies that indicate you're poor and frugal!

The funny thing is, I don't have an excess of cash (I continuously got the $94.08 price), but if you checked out my cookies you'd think I was a millionaire. Damn, I had just read an article on Lamborghini on Forbes. They should be trying to rip me off!

Squire
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.