Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mnmr

macrumors newbie
Aug 28, 2016
4
1
4 slot: http://amfeltec.com/products/pci-express-gen-3-carrier-board-for-4-m-2-ssd-modules/
SKU-086-34-320x220.jpg

^ Does anyone know if this board / PLX chips in general use the whole width of the host interface? That is, will the data from the M.2 SSD be sent at x16 or only x4? The former would mean a PCIe 3.0 SSD could still achieve full bandwidth plugged in to a PCIe 2.0 motherboard.
 

Squuiid

macrumors 68000
Oct 31, 2006
1,860
1,607
Thought I'd share this. Went to the Amfeltec website and saw they introduced more Gen 3 M.2 carrier boards. The two that caught my eye were the 2 slot and 4 slot boards. The slots seem wider now so maybe less spacing issues. Not sure if these support AHCI or NVME SSDs - my guess they are NVME only?

2 slot: http://amfeltec.com/products/pci-express-gen-3-carrier-board-for-2-m-2-ssd-modules/
SKU-086-32-320x220.jpg


4 slot: http://amfeltec.com/products/pci-express-gen-3-carrier-board-for-4-m-2-ssd-modules/
SKU-086-34-320x220.jpg
I contacted Amfeltec to obtain pricing and they told me that Gen 3 is not compatible with Mac Pros.

"Thank you for your interest in our products. Please note that we recommend to use Gen2 Carrier board for Mac Pro users because old Mac doesn’t support Gen 3 multi-modules Carrier board properly.

You can use or 2 SKU-086-31 or SKU-086-01."
 

zedsdeadbaby

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2016
145
64
I'm looking into the Gen 2 board. Looks as if its still available?

I've never looked into an M.2 PCIe option for my Mac Pro before, (5,1) and now that everything is NVMe I'm having a hard time sussing out compatibility...

Basically I'm looking at adding two Kingston HyperX Predator M.2s. Should I be good to go with these, or are there any other blades that anyone would recommend? (Won't be booting from this, just using it to stream audio data for sampling instruments...)
 

ShawnF

macrumors regular
May 10, 2014
196
16
The Amfeltec Gen 3 board is compatible with 2010 Mac Pro towers. But the speed gets bottlenecked according to this Barefeats analysis:

http://barefeats.com/hard220.html

I contacted Amfeltec to obtain pricing and they told me that Gen 3 is not compatible with Mac Pros.

"Thank you for your interest in our products. Please note that we recommend to use Gen2 Carrier board for Mac Pro users because old Mac doesn’t support Gen 3 multi-modules Carrier board properly.

You can use or 2 SKU-086-31 or SKU-086-01."
 

macuser453787

macrumors 6502a
May 19, 2012
578
151
Galatians 3:13-14
Just be weary that using that kind of bandwidth frequently on that poorly cooled X58 chipset will reduce the life of the system. Apple's implementation already runs 20C above Intel recommendations.

In case this hasn't already been mentioned, TG Pro works great for customizing fan speeds, including in the PCI bay.

It'll get those temps down quite handily.

And it just happens to be on sale right now. :)
 

William_si

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2016
188
55
Croatia
Some serious "outside of the box" thinking. To paraphrase 'The Architect': not being limited by the boundaries of perfection certainly opens up a few doors… =)

Have you emailed Sir Ive your suggestions to the imperfections in the Mac Pro design?

nope, custom and unique :)

The former would mean a PCIe 3.0 SSD could still achieve full bandwidth plugged in to a PCIe 2.0 motherboard.

No, PLX does generally not does this, i'm not sure the chips even support it in hardware. PCIe 3.0 is... a bit different to 2.0 which would require generally recoding as opposed to just both sided legacy (2.0) operation.

Kingston HyperX Predator M.2s

These are my go to now as well, best option without getting ripped off.
 

ShawnF

macrumors regular
May 10, 2014
196
16
Thanks to Barefeats. I saw their recent tweet where the posted speed of the Kingston Digital HyperX Predator PCIE. It comes in 480GB and 960GB flavors, and given their pricing looks like a good alternative to the Samsung SM951s. Initial tests by Barefeats show really good performance for an AHCI PCIE SSD. I would just buy 4 - rip out the SSDs and put them all in an Amfeltec card.

71RJOSQahhL._SL1500_.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: itdk92 and Synchro3

Squuiid

macrumors 68000
Oct 31, 2006
1,860
1,607
Thanks to Barefeats. I saw their recent tweet where the posted speed of the Kingston Digital HyperX Predator PCIE. It comes in 480GB and 960GB flavors, and given their pricing looks like a good alternative to the Samsung SM951s. Initial tests by Barefeats show really good performance for an AHCI PCIE SSD. I would just buy 4 - rip out the SSDs and put them all in an Amfeltec card.

71RJOSQahhL._SL1500_.jpg
Sandforce based? Personally, I'd run a mile from these.
Always look for the telltale sign of 240, 480 and 960GB capacities.
If so, performance using compressed data, such as video files, will be garbage.
I'd just be sure you know what you're getting before buying 4 of them ;)
 
Last edited:

itdk92

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2016
504
180
Copenhagen, Denmark
Sandforce based? Personally, I'd run a mile from these.
Always look for the telltale sign of 240, 480 and 960GB capacities.
If so, performance using compressed data, such as video files, will be garbage.
I'd just be sure you know what you're getting before buying 4 of them ;)

could you elaborate? :)
[doublepost=1481309171][/doublepost]
could you elaborate? :)

LOL those ssds were my main evil upgrade plan
 

ShawnF

macrumors regular
May 10, 2014
196
16
Sandforce based? Personally, I'd run a mile from these.
Always look for the telltale sign of 240, 480 and 960GB capacities.
If so, performance using compressed data, such as video files, will be garbage.
I'd just be sure you know what you're getting before buying 4 of them ;)
I believe these use Marvell controllers - it's on the specsheet and on the Amazon page as well.
 

zedsdeadbaby

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2016
145
64
I believe these use Marvell controllers - it's on the specsheet and on the Amazon page as well.

They are Marvell. I'll be honest, aside from the basics I don't necessarily know what some of the specs below indicate aside from the obvious ones, speed, expectancy, TBW, IOPS...

Or, to put it better, how some of the benchmarks translate, if they indicate these are crap etc... I'd be curious if anyone know how they compare at least on paper... datasheet here: http://www.hyperxgaming.com/datasheets/SHPM2280P2_us.pdf

From the manfacturers data sheet:

  • Interface PCIe Gen 2.0 x4
  • NAND MLC
  • Controller Marvell 88SS9293
  • Baseline performance2

    Compressible Data Transfer (ATTO)

    240GB — 1400MB/s Read and 600MB/s Write
    480GB — 1400MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write
    960GB — 1350MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write

    Incompressible Data Transfer (AS-SSD and CrystalDiskMark)

    240GB — 1290MB/s Read and 600MB/s Write
    480GB — 1100MB/s Read and 910MB/s Write
    960GB — 1300MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write

    IOMETER Maximum 4k Read/Write

    240GB — up to 160,000/ up to 119,000 IOPS
    480GB — up to 130,000/ up to 118,000 IOPS
    960GB — up to 160,000 / up to 126,000 IOPS

    Random 4k Read/Write

    240GB — up to 120,000/ up to 78,000 IOPS
    480GB — up to 117,000/ up to 70,000 IOPS
    960GB — up to 111,000 / up to 72,000 IOPS

    PCMark® 8 Storage Score
    240GB — 5,015
    480GB — 5,017
    960GB — 5,045
    Anvil Total Score (Incompressible Workload)
    240GB — 6,500
    480GB — 6,700
    960GB — 6,800
    • Life expectancy 1 million hours MTBF
    • Total Bytes Written (TBW)
      240GB — 415TB 1.6 DWPD4
      480GB — 882TB 1.7 DWPD4
      960GB — 1600TB 1.8 DWPD4
 
  • Like
Reactions: itdk92

itdk92

macrumors 6502a
Nov 14, 2016
504
180
Copenhagen, Denmark
They are Marvell. I'll be honest, aside from the basics I don't necessarily know what some of the specs below indicate aside from the obvious ones, speed, expectancy, TBW, IOPS...

Or, to put it better, how some of the benchmarks translate, if they indicate these are crap etc... I'd be curious if anyone know how they compare at least on paper... datasheet here: http://www.hyperxgaming.com/datasheets/SHPM2280P2_us.pdf

From the manfacturers data sheet:

  • Interface PCIe Gen 2.0 x4
  • NAND MLC
  • Controller Marvell 88SS9293
  • Baseline performance2

    Compressible Data Transfer (ATTO)

    240GB — 1400MB/s Read and 600MB/s Write
    480GB — 1400MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write
    960GB — 1350MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write

    Incompressible Data Transfer (AS-SSD and CrystalDiskMark)

    240GB — 1290MB/s Read and 600MB/s Write
    480GB — 1100MB/s Read and 910MB/s Write
    960GB — 1300MB/s Read and 1000MB/s Write

    IOMETER Maximum 4k Read/Write

    240GB — up to 160,000/ up to 119,000 IOPS
    480GB — up to 130,000/ up to 118,000 IOPS
    960GB — up to 160,000 / up to 126,000 IOPS

    Random 4k Read/Write

    240GB — up to 120,000/ up to 78,000 IOPS
    480GB — up to 117,000/ up to 70,000 IOPS
    960GB — up to 111,000 / up to 72,000 IOPS

    PCMark® 8 Storage Score
    240GB — 5,015
    480GB — 5,017
    960GB — 5,045
    Anvil Total Score (Incompressible Workload)
    240GB — 6,500
    480GB — 6,700
    960GB — 6,800
    • Life expectancy 1 million hours MTBF
    • Total Bytes Written (TBW)
      240GB — 415TB 1.6 DWPD4
      480GB — 882TB 1.7 DWPD4
      960GB — 1600TB 1.8 DWPD4

Definitely going for the 960GB models.

Also, my Squid is a x16, so performance shouldn't be a problem, even if i put it into the x8 slot
 

macuser453787

macrumors 6502a
May 19, 2012
578
151
Galatians 3:13-14
Well, you're the only one who will NOT see it as Spam!

And presenting an unknown App you have to pay for vs the free App that has proven itself....hmmmm hard choice.

I encourage you to examine your words and not be quick to judge. Are you absolutely certain that 100% of other people that read my reply would interpret it as spam?

Also just FYI, TG Pro is not unknown software. It may have been unknown to you at the time you first read my reply, but it is certainly known. It got reviewed by PC Mag and has several reviews on MacUpdate as well.

And cerberusss is right, I do prefer to pay for my software. :)
[doublepost=1481895311][/doublepost]
Well, some people prefer to pay for software. Free sometimes also means "quickly abandoned". I didn't view it as spam, just as a paid alternative.


Well said. Thanks much! :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cerberusss

Marmotta

macrumors newbie
Nov 27, 2016
21
17
Has anyone bought one of these recently? Cost seems to have gone up to $367 (plus $50 international shipping on something that can't weigh more than a few grams). I'm still tempted, but if and when it hits customs, the final price is really going to stack up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: itdk92

zedsdeadbaby

macrumors regular
Oct 27, 2016
145
64
Has anyone bought one of these recently? Cost seems to have gone up to $367 (plus $50 international shipping on something that can't weigh more than a few grams). I'm still tempted, but if and when it hits customs, the final price is really going to stack up.

I did and yeah shipping was around $40-50 to the US. With 4 heat sinks it ran me $422. (Heatsinks were $4 each...)
Where are you? I found a place is the UK (for someone on a composer's forum) that had them for 385 pounds.

Definitely going for the 960GB models.

Also, my Squid is a x16, so performance shouldn't be a problem, even if i put it into the x8 slot

I did as well. Didn't really see many other options now that the Samsungs have gone through the roof, let alone being impossible to find... Would have been the same or more than the pre-made ones from tansintl. (Which are now gone anyway.) Running 2 in RAID 0 got me up to about 2600 MB/sec. We'll see how they hold up in the long term... Also you can buy these as raw m.2s without the cards...
 
  • Like
Reactions: itdk92

Psychilles

macrumors newbie
Dec 24, 2016
16
5
The Netherlands
Very intriguing stuff here! The jury is still out on NVMe? Because it's real difficult to get SM951 AHCI cards.

Edit: found my answer on another thread.
 
Last edited:

William_si

macrumors regular
Apr 4, 2016
188
55
Croatia
The HyperX is ok as in the other thread, my 480GB variant while slower than a SM951 is still best option available at reasonable price.
 
  • Like
Reactions: itdk92
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.