As mentioned in the thread, it's rather established and widespread type of corporate policy for employees not to interfere with something like this (other than perhaps employees that are specifically there to deal with security type of issues, if there are any like that). It's quite possible that if an employee was to interfere they might have been fired for not following policy (and that's potentially on top of anything that might have resulted from that interference). Fairly basic and established things in the retail world.Pretty nice, love to see it, i have experienced the same anger against Apple but losing your freedom for a tech company not worth it...
It was hilarious watching all those "geniuses" doing absolutely nothing for the store, i'd fired them all.
What about one of the genious being attacked? Is there a policy for the others to help him or just watch?As mentioned in the thread, it's rather established and widespread type of corporate policy for employees not to interfere with something like this (other than perhaps employees that are specifically there to deal with security type of issues, if there are any like that). It's quite possible that if an employee was to interfere they might have been fired for not following policy (and that's potentially on top of anything that might have resulted from that interference). Fairly basic and established things in the retail world.
When employee and/or customer lives are involved that's a different thing with different policies involved down to basic self-defense. But that's neither here nor there as far as all of this goes.What about one of the genious being attacked? Is there a policy for the others to help him or just watch?
When employee and/or customer lives are involved that's a different thing with different policies involved down to basic self-defense. But that's neither here nor there as far as all of this goes.
Not surprised at all. He had a petanque ball or boule, which is made of 650 to 800 grams of steel. That can easily turn into a lethal weapon, and if not lethal, create some nasty injuries.Surprised the staff didn't do anything to stop him.
Everything he destroyed isn't exactly cheap, but it is going to be paid for. The employee's life and health is worth a lot more than one or two dozen iPhones. And I mean that literally. An employee hit in the head with a petanque ball can cost millions in the worst case.It was hilarious watching all those "geniuses" doing absolutely nothing for the store, i'd fired them all.
What's the point? He got arrested, got convicted, and he is going to pay for the damages. Over the next years. Stopping him would only mean he pays less damages, and you risk getting yourself hurt. Pulling out a camera is a good idea to get someone convicted beyond both reasonable and unreasonable doubt. Would be different obviously if he attacked people.People only do this because they have no fear of anybody interfearing. Everyone is afraid to get involved but quick to pull out the camera. I know everyone is not an MMA fighter but any two guys watching that could have stopped him and held him for the cops.
Well, do they? What evidence? How often? Has Apple been convicted or fined? If not, how would Apple "deserve" this?The guy is obviously disturbed but Apple deserve this considering they are going against EU regulations over customer's rights for refunds.
But that's expected from one big fat greedy company like Apple anyway. I can understand how the customer feels but I think he was going a bit over the top by smashing up iPhones and Macs even though Apple deserve it.
Latest news: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/26/boulesarmed_burgundian_iphone_wrecker_hit_with_damages/
"The court decided to hit the now much calmer Serre with damages of €17,758 (£15,880/$19,379), a six-month suspended sentence, two years' probation, and a ban from the shopping mall where he carried out his pétanque-enable phone assault."
Hope he enjoyed it, but I have had more fun for less money.
Sounds like a bit of a nutcase.Apple's lawyers said Serre had launched threats against Apple in the past – in 2010, 2013 and 2014.
Sounds like a bit of a nutcase.
Poor soul. He needs help.
He'd potentially be let off easy due to a case of something along the lines of "affluenza"?He's the luckiest guy on Earth. If he pulled that cute act in rural America......(just let your imagination run wild).
Surprised the staff didn't do anything to stop him.
Quite a bit of the thread explains that part of it all.Same here. I was wondering when that was going to happen and it never did.
Well, "the customer is always right" was explained to me in a different way.They believe "the customer is always right " or " I pay your wages so you do what I want". Well, the customer is not always right, sometimes the customer is a jackass and while it is true that you pay my wages that does not mean you can treat me with a lack of respect.
All Apple deserves for all of that is for irate customers to stop buying their products. Customers with specific grievances should pursue the legal remedies afforded to them. Speaking out in a mature and responsible manner on social media (not a childish rant) would also be an effective and adult response, as many customers have gotten positive responses from companies after stating their problem on Twitter and FB and other outlets.Apple deserves much worse when you consider they evade taxes, enforce inferior industry standards (lighting over headphone jack), false advertising (iMac advertised as 4ghz but it cant run that fast because it overheats), commits planned obsolescence, etc.
Now watch Apple fans disagree for some reason.