Another reason to be happy about C2D+320M

Discussion in 'MacBook Air' started by KnightWRX, Mar 11, 2011.

  1. macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #1
  2. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Location:
    A hot desert
    #2
    I trust Anandtech much more than anecdotal engadget reports.

    The MBA is slow comparatively - that's ok - it's not supposed to be fast, it's supposed to be light.
     
  3. iDisk, Mar 11, 2011
    Last edited: Mar 11, 2011

    macrumors 6502a

    iDisk

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Location:
    Menlo Park, CA
    #3
    Though I don't have a 13"MBP, but have the Ultimate Air, I will say this article pretty much sums itself up for me and their so-called "findings" (see attached).

    The 13"MBP's only beat the air in a few categories. I/O and SB... Due to its lack luster GPU it doesn't really leap frog the 320, thus leaving it in comparison to a Ultimate Air.

    Not to mention the 11" Air has a better screen resolution then the 13" MBP, which is really a slap in the face to those customers.

    If anyone wants to buy a "Pro" notebook, hands down the 15" Models are to be considered (17" if thats your taste).
     

    Attached Files:

  4. thread starter macrumors Pentium

    KnightWRX

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2009
    Location:
    Quebec, Canada
    #4
    It's to be noted that Engadget's reports come from PC Pro and Notebook Journal, it's not anecdotal reports like you claim.

    iDisk, the update wasn't there when I first read the article.
     

Share This Page