Not really. Thats why it was marketed as a "pro" machine at the time.
You still won't be able to use it though. Your G4's PCI buss can only handle 266MB/sec, half of USB3's "theoretical" capacity.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Any New iMac Buyers Worried About USB 3.0!
- Thread starter solman
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not really. Thats why it was marketed as a "pro" machine at the time.
You still won't be able to use it though. Your G4's PCI buss can only handle 266MB/sec, half of USB3's "theoretical" capacity.
You're going to need PCIe x1 or x4 for a USB 3.0 controller depending on the variety. PCI won't make it this time out.
Any reason for Intel to put effort/resources into USB 3 when LightPeak will be coming out around the same time?
USB 3 officially will be implemented by Intel in 2011 or 2012... so who gives the f**k.
Backwards compatibility?
Anyway, you won't be seeing USB3 in iMacs for about 24 months, and peripherals that take advantage of it probably won't be widespread for another 12 or so after that -- so sure, if you're interested in putting off your purchase 3 years for the sake of USB 3.0, go ahead; if you're going to need a new computer soon-ish, don't hold your breath for USB 3.
That's why it would be ironic. What's going to approach the theoretical capacity anyway?
Too bad. Well then dual-core G5s will be capable of using it, while the modern quad-core iMacs won't. I'm going to be going the hackintosh route by then anyway, assuming Apple won't be offering a midrange tower.
Its very likely why they pushed USB 3 support to 2011. Intel's own LP is a direct competitor so it would be in Intel's favor to put most of their resources towards developing LP for asap mass production.
USB3 etc.
After stumbling on sites like http://www.reghardware.co.uk/ it appears that Light Peak will come after USB3 (as USB4 possibly) and is much faster.
If USB3-supporting mobos from ASUS, USB3 flash-drives from Super Talent, USB3 ExpressCard from Fresco Logic are mouth-watering already, it's hard to think Apple isn't chomping at the bit. It's difficult to think that Apple is going to wait while Intel bides its time on USB3, since interface speeds are the weak spot in mass computing.
Apple will, in time, include SATA-3 and BlueTooth-3, of course
After stumbling on sites like http://www.reghardware.co.uk/ it appears that Light Peak will come after USB3 (as USB4 possibly) and is much faster.
If USB3-supporting mobos from ASUS, USB3 flash-drives from Super Talent, USB3 ExpressCard from Fresco Logic are mouth-watering already, it's hard to think Apple isn't chomping at the bit. It's difficult to think that Apple is going to wait while Intel bides its time on USB3, since interface speeds are the weak spot in mass computing.
Apple will, in time, include SATA-3 and BlueTooth-3, of course
How about FireWire 1600/3200
So much talk about USB 3.0 - but what is the latest word on FireWire 1600/3200????
So much talk about USB 3.0 - but what is the latest word on FireWire 1600/3200????
So much talk about USB 3.0 - but what is the latest word on FireWire 1600/3200????
It will never happen, 800 was the end of the line.
The Mac I currently use was one of the last beige G3 PowerMacs, so it still has ADB, SCSI and Apple Serial ports. It has no USB ports, but this Mac has lasted me 11 years.
It really depends on what you do with the computer and whether you are constantly upgrading external devices which still work perfectly well (my original Apple Serial printer works fine, and it is only fairly recently that the bulb on my SCSI scanner has died).
The Mac I currently use was one of the last beige G3 PowerMacs, so it still has ADB, SCSI and Apple Serial ports. It has no USB ports, but this Mac has lasted me 11 years.
It really depends on what you do with the computer and whether you are constantly upgrading external devices which still work perfectly well (my original Apple Serial printer works fine, and it is only fairly recently that the bulb on my SCSI scanner has died).
I have an iMac G3 and it has USB, but the only thing I use it for is a memory stick, and that would work with even the slowest USB ports... By the way congradz on still using an old machine (like me lol). They are still useable and should not go to waste =)
old 'puters etc.
The sentiment for older machines is understandable, but time and electricity also should not go to waste
If you're using a high-cap high-speed thumbdrive to transfer gigabytes of stuff, then even USB2 starts to show its age.
I've got an iMac G3 and a '05 iBook G4, and the latter feels barely adequate with USB2/Bluetooth-2/wireless-G.
Necessary updates, for my mobile computing, would be a laptop with wireless-N/Bluetooth-3/USB-3/SATA-2 or -3/SnowLeopard/LED-display/polymer-battery. It's all about time and energy use.
The sentiment for older machines is understandable, but time and electricity also should not go to waste
If you're using a high-cap high-speed thumbdrive to transfer gigabytes of stuff, then even USB2 starts to show its age.
I've got an iMac G3 and a '05 iBook G4, and the latter feels barely adequate with USB2/Bluetooth-2/wireless-G.
Necessary updates, for my mobile computing, would be a laptop with wireless-N/Bluetooth-3/USB-3/SATA-2 or -3/SnowLeopard/LED-display/polymer-battery. It's all about time and energy use.
Ok, but I have a couple of questions.
1. Was USB1 in any Macs? If so, which Macs?
2. What is the difference between USB2 and USB1. I know its faster, but how?
Cheers!
Don't know what Macs had (I wasn't a mac guy then). Here's the wikipedia entry that will tell you everything you need to know about comparisons.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#USB_1.0
The CRT-based iMac G3 was the first Apple computer to use USB and it used USB 1.0. (You will often find things like keyring flash drives say they are backwards compatible with USB 1.0). I'd have to do an Apple history check to see which Mac introduced USB 2.0 though.
As well as USB 1.0 and USB 2.0 (and up-coming USB 3.0), there are also "powered" (on the Mac itself) and "non-powered" (on the keyboards, until fairly recently) versions of the ports.
As well as USB 1.0 and USB 2.0 (and up-coming USB 3.0), there are also "powered" (on the Mac itself) and "non-powered" (on the keyboards, until fairly recently) versions of the ports.
All high-speed (USB 2) devices are capable of full-speed (USB 1) operation. It's part of the USB 2 spec.
I believe it was the PowerMac G5 in June 2003.
What does USB3 offer that FireWire 800 does not offer?
Fact is that if you think that you should wait because some "new and improved" technology is on the horizon, then you would be waiting forever. There's ALWAYS something new and improved being released.
Do you NEED USB3? Why? For HD's you already have FireWire. For most peripherals USB2 is plenty fast. If you really, REALLY need it (which I doubt), then go ahead and wait. If not, now is as good time to buy as any. If you feel like waitin for USB 3, then what about other technologies? what about Light Peak?