Food ethics: it won't go away
I have an ethically and environmentally driven diet. I use a lot of macrobiotic ideas. I minimise animal products and when I do buy them, they are organically produced. I don't know about the organic certification in other countries, but in Australia it guarantees that the the animal had as good a life as possible before it was humanely killed.
I also refrain from eating endangered or threatened species of fish.
Because Australia is suffering from drought, a lot of people are calling for an end to the production of water-intensive crops such as rice. My response is that animal production is much more water-intensive. A very inefficient means of feeding humans.
As a species, we do need to realise that it's not all about us. It's our anthropocentric view that is ruining the Earth's ecosystems. An Earth without birds and insects would collapse very quickly. An Earth without humans would recover very quickly.
I don't think the idea of a vegetarian world is realistic at this point in time, but governments have a responsibility to promote the reduction of meat consumption. This could be done by promoting organic animal farming. Less meat would be sold at a higher cost, resulting in a win-win-win-win situation. (For animals, the environment, farmers and consumers.)
In Australia, the current recommendation for red meat is 800 grams per week. Health-wise, that may be OK according to the studies that they've done. But what happens when everyone on the planet starts eating that amount of red meat per week? It's just not sustainable.
I have an ethically and environmentally driven diet. I use a lot of macrobiotic ideas. I minimise animal products and when I do buy them, they are organically produced. I don't know about the organic certification in other countries, but in Australia it guarantees that the the animal had as good a life as possible before it was humanely killed.
I also refrain from eating endangered or threatened species of fish.
Because Australia is suffering from drought, a lot of people are calling for an end to the production of water-intensive crops such as rice. My response is that animal production is much more water-intensive. A very inefficient means of feeding humans.
As a species, we do need to realise that it's not all about us. It's our anthropocentric view that is ruining the Earth's ecosystems. An Earth without birds and insects would collapse very quickly. An Earth without humans would recover very quickly.
I don't think the idea of a vegetarian world is realistic at this point in time, but governments have a responsibility to promote the reduction of meat consumption. This could be done by promoting organic animal farming. Less meat would be sold at a higher cost, resulting in a win-win-win-win situation. (For animals, the environment, farmers and consumers.)
In Australia, the current recommendation for red meat is 800 grams per week. Health-wise, that may be OK according to the studies that they've done. But what happens when everyone on the planet starts eating that amount of red meat per week? It's just not sustainable.